利用Maryblyt改良韩国苹果园火斑病防治技术。

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Kyung-Bong Namkung, Sung Chul Yun
{"title":"利用Maryblyt改良韩国苹果园火斑病防治技术。","authors":"Kyung-Bong Namkung,&nbsp;Sung Chul Yun","doi":"10.5423/PPJ.OA.08.2023.0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After transitioning from periodic to model-based control policy for fire blight blossom infection, it is crucial to provide the timing of field application with easy and accurate information. To assess the risk of blossom infection, Maryblyt was employed in 31 sites across apple-producing regions nationwide, including areas prone to fire blight outbreaks, from 2021 to 2023. In 2021 and 2023, two and seven sites experienced Blossom Infection Risk-Infection warning occurrences among 31 sites, respectively. However, in 2022, most of the sites observed Blossom Infection Risk-Infection from April 25 to 28, highlighting the need for blossom infection control. For the comparison between the two model-based control approaches, we established treatment 1, which involved control measures according to the Blossom Infection Risk-Infection warning and treatment 2, aimed at maintaining the Epiphytic Infection Potential below 100. The analysis of control values between these treatments revealed that treatment 2 was more effective in reducing Blossom Infection Risk-Infection and the number of days with Epiphytic Infection Potential above 100, with respective averages of 95.6% and 93.0% over the three years. Since 2022, the implementation of the K-Maryblyt system and the deployment of Automated Weather Stations capable of measuring orchard weather conditions, with an average of 10 stations per major apple fire blight county nationwide, have taken place. These advancements will enable the provision of more accurate and timely information for farmers based on fire blight models in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":20173,"journal":{"name":"Plant Pathology Journal","volume":"39 5","pages":"504-512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/47/ppj-oa-08-2023-0110.PMC10580054.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Fire Blight Blossom Infection Control Using Maryblyt in Korean Apple Orchards.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Bong Namkung,&nbsp;Sung Chul Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.5423/PPJ.OA.08.2023.0110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After transitioning from periodic to model-based control policy for fire blight blossom infection, it is crucial to provide the timing of field application with easy and accurate information. To assess the risk of blossom infection, Maryblyt was employed in 31 sites across apple-producing regions nationwide, including areas prone to fire blight outbreaks, from 2021 to 2023. In 2021 and 2023, two and seven sites experienced Blossom Infection Risk-Infection warning occurrences among 31 sites, respectively. However, in 2022, most of the sites observed Blossom Infection Risk-Infection from April 25 to 28, highlighting the need for blossom infection control. For the comparison between the two model-based control approaches, we established treatment 1, which involved control measures according to the Blossom Infection Risk-Infection warning and treatment 2, aimed at maintaining the Epiphytic Infection Potential below 100. The analysis of control values between these treatments revealed that treatment 2 was more effective in reducing Blossom Infection Risk-Infection and the number of days with Epiphytic Infection Potential above 100, with respective averages of 95.6% and 93.0% over the three years. Since 2022, the implementation of the K-Maryblyt system and the deployment of Automated Weather Stations capable of measuring orchard weather conditions, with an average of 10 stations per major apple fire blight county nationwide, have taken place. These advancements will enable the provision of more accurate and timely information for farmers based on fire blight models in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Pathology Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"504-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/47/ppj-oa-08-2023-0110.PMC10580054.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Pathology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.08.2023.0110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Pathology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.08.2023.0110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在从周期性控制策略过渡到基于模型的控制策略后,为田间应用提供简单准确的信息至关重要。为了评估花朵感染的风险,从2021年到2023年,Maryblyt在全国苹果产区的31个地点工作,包括容易爆发火疫病的地区。2021年和2023年,31个站点中分别有2个和7个站点出现Blossom感染风险感染警告。然而,在2022年,大多数站点在4月25日至28日观察到Blossom感染风险感染,这突出了控制Blossom传染的必要性。为了比较两种基于模型的控制方法,我们制定了治疗1,其中包括根据Blossom感染风险感染警告采取的控制措施和治疗2,旨在将表生感染潜力保持在100以下。对这些处理之间的对照值的分析表明,处理2在降低Blossom感染风险感染和表生感染可能性超过100的天数方面更有效,三年内的平均值分别为95.6%和93.0%。自2022年以来,K-Maryblyt系统的实施和能够测量果园天气状况的自动气象站的部署已经开始,全国每个主要苹果枯萎病县平均有10个气象站。这些进步将使未来能够根据火疫病模型为农民提供更准确、及时的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improvement of Fire Blight Blossom Infection Control Using Maryblyt in Korean Apple Orchards.

Improvement of Fire Blight Blossom Infection Control Using Maryblyt in Korean Apple Orchards.

Improvement of Fire Blight Blossom Infection Control Using Maryblyt in Korean Apple Orchards.

Improvement of Fire Blight Blossom Infection Control Using Maryblyt in Korean Apple Orchards.

After transitioning from periodic to model-based control policy for fire blight blossom infection, it is crucial to provide the timing of field application with easy and accurate information. To assess the risk of blossom infection, Maryblyt was employed in 31 sites across apple-producing regions nationwide, including areas prone to fire blight outbreaks, from 2021 to 2023. In 2021 and 2023, two and seven sites experienced Blossom Infection Risk-Infection warning occurrences among 31 sites, respectively. However, in 2022, most of the sites observed Blossom Infection Risk-Infection from April 25 to 28, highlighting the need for blossom infection control. For the comparison between the two model-based control approaches, we established treatment 1, which involved control measures according to the Blossom Infection Risk-Infection warning and treatment 2, aimed at maintaining the Epiphytic Infection Potential below 100. The analysis of control values between these treatments revealed that treatment 2 was more effective in reducing Blossom Infection Risk-Infection and the number of days with Epiphytic Infection Potential above 100, with respective averages of 95.6% and 93.0% over the three years. Since 2022, the implementation of the K-Maryblyt system and the deployment of Automated Weather Stations capable of measuring orchard weather conditions, with an average of 10 stations per major apple fire blight county nationwide, have taken place. These advancements will enable the provision of more accurate and timely information for farmers based on fire blight models in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Pathology Journal
Plant Pathology Journal 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信