复杂腹部-骨盆手术中严重骨盆出血的处理和结果。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
European Surgical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1159/000534477
Erman Aytac, Selman Sökmen, Ersin Öztürk, Ahmet Rencüzoğulları, Uğur Sungurtekin, Cihangir Akyol, Sezai Demirbaş, Sezai Leventoğlu, Feza Karakayalı, Mustafa Ali Korkut, Mustafa Öncel, Barış Gülcü, Aras Emre Canda, İsmail Cem Eray, Utku Özgen, Şiyar Ersöz, Tahir Özer, İsmail Hakkı Özerhan, Osman Bozbıyık, Mustafa Haksal, Berke Mustafa Oral
{"title":"复杂腹部-骨盆手术中严重骨盆出血的处理和结果。","authors":"Erman Aytac, Selman Sökmen, Ersin Öztürk, Ahmet Rencüzoğulları, Uğur Sungurtekin, Cihangir Akyol, Sezai Demirbaş, Sezai Leventoğlu, Feza Karakayalı, Mustafa Ali Korkut, Mustafa Öncel, Barış Gülcü, Aras Emre Canda, İsmail Cem Eray, Utku Özgen, Şiyar Ersöz, Tahir Özer, İsmail Hakkı Özerhan, Osman Bozbıyık, Mustafa Haksal, Berke Mustafa Oral","doi":"10.1159/000534477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemorrhage is a challenging complication of pelvic surgery. This study aimed to analyze the causes, management, and factors associated with morbidity in patients experiencing major pelvic hemorrhage during complex abdominopelvic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had major intraoperative pelvic hemorrhage during complex abdominopelvic surgery at 11 tertiary referral centers between 1997 and 2017 were included. Patient characteristics, management strategies to control bleeding, short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 120 patients with a mean age of 56.6 ± 2.4 years and a mean BMI of 28.3 ± 1 kg/m2. While 104 (95%) of the patients were operated for malignancy, 16 (5%) of the patients had surgery for a benign disease. The most common bleeding site was the presacral venous plexus 90 (75%). Major pelvic hemorrhage was managed simultaneously in 114 (95%) patients. Electrocauterization 27 (23%), pelvic packing 26 (22%), suturing 7 (6%), thumbtacks application 7 (6%), muscle welding 4 (4%), use of energy devices 2 (2%), and topical hemostatic agents 2 (2%) were the management tools. Combined techniques were used in 43 (36%) patients. Short-term morbidity and mortality rates were 48 (40%) and 2 (2%), respectively. High preoperative CRP levels (p = 0.04), history of preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.04), longer bleeding time (p = 0.006), and increased blood transfusion (p = 0.005) were the factors associated with postoperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative morbidity related to major pelvic hemorrhage can be reduced by optimizing the risk factors. Prehabilitation prior to surgery to moderate inflammatory status and prompt action with proper technique to control major pelvic hemorrhage can prevent excessive blood loss in complex abdominopelvic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management and Morbidity of Major Pelvic Hemorrhage in Complex Abdominopelvic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Erman Aytac, Selman Sökmen, Ersin Öztürk, Ahmet Rencüzoğulları, Uğur Sungurtekin, Cihangir Akyol, Sezai Demirbaş, Sezai Leventoğlu, Feza Karakayalı, Mustafa Ali Korkut, Mustafa Öncel, Barış Gülcü, Aras Emre Canda, İsmail Cem Eray, Utku Özgen, Şiyar Ersöz, Tahir Özer, İsmail Hakkı Özerhan, Osman Bozbıyık, Mustafa Haksal, Berke Mustafa Oral\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemorrhage is a challenging complication of pelvic surgery. This study aimed to analyze the causes, management, and factors associated with morbidity in patients experiencing major pelvic hemorrhage during complex abdominopelvic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had major intraoperative pelvic hemorrhage during complex abdominopelvic surgery at 11 tertiary referral centers between 1997 and 2017 were included. Patient characteristics, management strategies to control bleeding, short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 120 patients with a mean age of 56.6 ± 2.4 years and a mean BMI of 28.3 ± 1 kg/m2. While 104 (95%) of the patients were operated for malignancy, 16 (5%) of the patients had surgery for a benign disease. The most common bleeding site was the presacral venous plexus 90 (75%). Major pelvic hemorrhage was managed simultaneously in 114 (95%) patients. Electrocauterization 27 (23%), pelvic packing 26 (22%), suturing 7 (6%), thumbtacks application 7 (6%), muscle welding 4 (4%), use of energy devices 2 (2%), and topical hemostatic agents 2 (2%) were the management tools. Combined techniques were used in 43 (36%) patients. Short-term morbidity and mortality rates were 48 (40%) and 2 (2%), respectively. High preoperative CRP levels (p = 0.04), history of preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.04), longer bleeding time (p = 0.006), and increased blood transfusion (p = 0.005) were the factors associated with postoperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative morbidity related to major pelvic hemorrhage can be reduced by optimizing the risk factors. Prehabilitation prior to surgery to moderate inflammatory status and prompt action with proper technique to control major pelvic hemorrhage can prevent excessive blood loss in complex abdominopelvic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534477\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:出血是盆腔手术的一个具有挑战性的并发症。本研究旨在分析复杂腹部-骨盆手术中发生严重骨盆出血的患者的病因、处理方法和发病率相关因素。方法:纳入1997-2017年间在11个三级转诊中心进行复杂腹盆腔手术时发生术中盆腔大出血的患者。回顾性评价患者特点、控制出血的管理策略、术后短期和长期结果。结果:120例患者的平均年龄为56.6±2.4岁,平均BMI为28.3±1 kg/m2。104名(95%)患者因恶性肿瘤接受了手术,16名(5%)患者因良性疾病接受了手术。最常见的出血部位是骶前静脉丛90处(75%)。114名(95%)患者同时治疗了严重的盆腔出血。电凝27例(23%),盆腔填塞26例(22%),缝合7例(6%),图钉应用7例(6%),肌肉焊接4例(4%),能量装置使用2例(2%)和局部止血剂2例(2%)是管理工具。43例(36%)患者采用了联合技术。短期发病率和死亡率分别为48(40%)和2(2%)。术前CRP水平高(p=0.04)、术前放疗史(p=0.04、出血时间长(p=0.006)和输血量增加(p=0.005)是与术后发病率相关的因素。讨论/结论:通过优化危险因素,可以降低与严重盆腔出血相关的术后发病率。在复杂的腹盆手术中,术前对中度炎症状态进行预适应,并及时采取适当的技术控制严重的骨盆出血,可以防止失血过多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management and Morbidity of Major Pelvic Hemorrhage in Complex Abdominopelvic Surgery.

Introduction: Hemorrhage is a challenging complication of pelvic surgery. This study aimed to analyze the causes, management, and factors associated with morbidity in patients experiencing major pelvic hemorrhage during complex abdominopelvic surgery.

Methods: Patients who had major intraoperative pelvic hemorrhage during complex abdominopelvic surgery at 11 tertiary referral centers between 1997 and 2017 were included. Patient characteristics, management strategies to control bleeding, short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.

Results: There were 120 patients with a mean age of 56.6 ± 2.4 years and a mean BMI of 28.3 ± 1 kg/m2. While 104 (95%) of the patients were operated for malignancy, 16 (5%) of the patients had surgery for a benign disease. The most common bleeding site was the presacral venous plexus 90 (75%). Major pelvic hemorrhage was managed simultaneously in 114 (95%) patients. Electrocauterization 27 (23%), pelvic packing 26 (22%), suturing 7 (6%), thumbtacks application 7 (6%), muscle welding 4 (4%), use of energy devices 2 (2%), and topical hemostatic agents 2 (2%) were the management tools. Combined techniques were used in 43 (36%) patients. Short-term morbidity and mortality rates were 48 (40%) and 2 (2%), respectively. High preoperative CRP levels (p = 0.04), history of preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.04), longer bleeding time (p = 0.006), and increased blood transfusion (p = 0.005) were the factors associated with postoperative morbidity.

Conclusion: Postoperative morbidity related to major pelvic hemorrhage can be reduced by optimizing the risk factors. Prehabilitation prior to surgery to moderate inflammatory status and prompt action with proper technique to control major pelvic hemorrhage can prevent excessive blood loss in complex abdominopelvic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信