2021年2月至3月,荷兰,手动反向接触者追踪在实际控制新冠肺炎方面的价值:一项试点研究。

IF 9.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Timo Louis Boelsums, Inge Anna Theresia van de Luitgaarden, Jane Whelan, Hanna Poell, Charlotte Maria Hoffman, Ewout Fanoy, Maaike Buskermolen, Jan Hendrik Richardus
{"title":"2021年2月至3月,荷兰,手动反向接触者追踪在实际控制新冠肺炎方面的价值:一项试点研究。","authors":"Timo Louis Boelsums, Inge Anna Theresia van de Luitgaarden, Jane Whelan, Hanna Poell, Charlotte Maria Hoffman, Ewout Fanoy, Maaike Buskermolen, Jan Hendrik Richardus","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundContact tracing has been a key component of COVID-19 outbreak control. Backward contact tracing (BCT) aims to trace the source that infected the index case and, thereafter, the cases infected by the source. Modelling studies have suggested BCT will substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in addition to forward contact tracing.AimTo assess the feasibility and impact of adding BCT in practice.MethodsWe identified COVID-19 cases who were already registered in the electronic database between 19 February and 10 March 2021 for routine contact tracing at the Public Health Service (PHS) of Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands (pop. 1.3 million). We investigated if, through a structured questionnaire by dedicated contact tracers, we could trace additional sources and cases infected by these sources. Potential sources identified by the index were approached to trace the source's contacts. We evaluated the number of source contacts that could be additionally quarantined.ResultsOf 7,448 COVID-19 cases interviewed in the study period, 47% (n = 3,497) indicated a source that was already registered as a case in the PHS electronic database. A potential, not yet registered source was traced in 13% (n = 979). Backward contact tracing was possible in 62 of 979 cases, from whom an additional 133 potential sources were traced, and four were eligible for tracing of source contacts. Two additional contacts traced had to stay in quarantine for 1 day. No new COVID-19 cases were confirmed.ConclusionsThe addition of manual BCT to control the COVID-19 pandemic did not provide added value in our study setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"28 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Timo Louis Boelsums, Inge Anna Theresia van de Luitgaarden, Jane Whelan, Hanna Poell, Charlotte Maria Hoffman, Ewout Fanoy, Maaike Buskermolen, Jan Hendrik Richardus\",\"doi\":\"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundContact tracing has been a key component of COVID-19 outbreak control. Backward contact tracing (BCT) aims to trace the source that infected the index case and, thereafter, the cases infected by the source. Modelling studies have suggested BCT will substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in addition to forward contact tracing.AimTo assess the feasibility and impact of adding BCT in practice.MethodsWe identified COVID-19 cases who were already registered in the electronic database between 19 February and 10 March 2021 for routine contact tracing at the Public Health Service (PHS) of Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands (pop. 1.3 million). We investigated if, through a structured questionnaire by dedicated contact tracers, we could trace additional sources and cases infected by these sources. Potential sources identified by the index were approached to trace the source's contacts. We evaluated the number of source contacts that could be additionally quarantined.ResultsOf 7,448 COVID-19 cases interviewed in the study period, 47% (n = 3,497) indicated a source that was already registered as a case in the PHS electronic database. A potential, not yet registered source was traced in 13% (n = 979). Backward contact tracing was possible in 62 of 979 cases, from whom an additional 133 potential sources were traced, and four were eligible for tracing of source contacts. Two additional contacts traced had to stay in quarantine for 1 day. No new COVID-19 cases were confirmed.ConclusionsThe addition of manual BCT to control the COVID-19 pandemic did not provide added value in our study setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurosurveillance\",\"volume\":\"28 41\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurosurveillance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景接触者追踪一直是新冠肺炎疫情控制的关键组成部分。反向接触者追踪(BCT)旨在追踪感染索引病例的来源,然后追踪由该来源感染的病例。建模研究表明,除了前向接触者追踪外,BCT还将大幅减少严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的传播。目的评估在实践中增加BCT的可行性和影响。方法我们确定了在2021年2月19日至3月10日期间已经在荷兰罗特丹-里金蒙德公共卫生服务(PHS)的电子数据库中登记的新冠肺炎病例,用于常规接触者追踪(人口130万)。我们调查了通过专门的接触追踪人员进行的结构化问卷调查,我们是否可以追踪其他来源和由这些来源感染的病例。已联系该索引确定的潜在来源,以追踪该来源的联系人。我们评估了可以额外隔离的来源接触者的数量。结果在研究期间访问的7448例新冠肺炎病例中,47%(n = 3497)指示已经在PHS电子数据库中登记为病例的来源。在13%(n = 979)。979例病例中有62例可以进行后向接触者追踪,从中又追踪到133个潜在来源,其中4例有资格追踪来源接触者。另外两名被追踪到的接触者必须隔离一天。无新增新冠肺炎确诊病例。结论在我们的研究环境中,增加手动BCT来控制新冠肺炎大流行并没有提供附加值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.

The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.

The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.

The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.

BackgroundContact tracing has been a key component of COVID-19 outbreak control. Backward contact tracing (BCT) aims to trace the source that infected the index case and, thereafter, the cases infected by the source. Modelling studies have suggested BCT will substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in addition to forward contact tracing.AimTo assess the feasibility and impact of adding BCT in practice.MethodsWe identified COVID-19 cases who were already registered in the electronic database between 19 February and 10 March 2021 for routine contact tracing at the Public Health Service (PHS) of Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands (pop. 1.3 million). We investigated if, through a structured questionnaire by dedicated contact tracers, we could trace additional sources and cases infected by these sources. Potential sources identified by the index were approached to trace the source's contacts. We evaluated the number of source contacts that could be additionally quarantined.ResultsOf 7,448 COVID-19 cases interviewed in the study period, 47% (n = 3,497) indicated a source that was already registered as a case in the PHS electronic database. A potential, not yet registered source was traced in 13% (n = 979). Backward contact tracing was possible in 62 of 979 cases, from whom an additional 133 potential sources were traced, and four were eligible for tracing of source contacts. Two additional contacts traced had to stay in quarantine for 1 day. No new COVID-19 cases were confirmed.ConclusionsThe addition of manual BCT to control the COVID-19 pandemic did not provide added value in our study setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurosurveillance
Eurosurveillance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
32.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
430
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信