{"title":"基于问题的学习方法结合思维导图对护理教学影响的荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenping Yan, Fenju Sun, Meng Xu, Qi Zhang","doi":"10.17219/acem/170097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nowadays, there are a variety of viewpoints on problem-based learning (PBL) and mind mapping teaching outcomes in nursing education, but there are not many thorough assessments that are pertinent.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the PBL method combined with mind mapping on nursing instruction.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search up to July 2022 was performed, and 1765 related studies were evaluated. The chosen studies comprised 1473 nursing teaching participants as the trial's baseline, with 770 of them using the PBL model with mind mapping and 703 enrolled as controls. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of the PBL method combined with mind mapping on nursing instructions using dichotomous and continuous methods with a random or fixed effect model. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD 42022432130).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PBL model with mind mapping reached a significantly higher results of nursing knowledge test (MD: 7.29, 95% CI: 6.88-7.71, p < 0.001) and pediatric practice test (MD: 9.89, 95% CI: 9.04-10.74, p < 0.001), as well as higher students' ability of independent learning (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 2.11-5.76, p < 0.001) compared to the controls in nursing teaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PBL model with mind mapping resulted in a significantly higher results of nursing knowledge test, pediatric practice test and students' ability of independent learning compared to controls in nursing teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of the impact of the problem-based method of learning combined with mind mapping on nursing instruction.\",\"authors\":\"Wenping Yan, Fenju Sun, Meng Xu, Qi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/170097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nowadays, there are a variety of viewpoints on problem-based learning (PBL) and mind mapping teaching outcomes in nursing education, but there are not many thorough assessments that are pertinent.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the PBL method combined with mind mapping on nursing instruction.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search up to July 2022 was performed, and 1765 related studies were evaluated. The chosen studies comprised 1473 nursing teaching participants as the trial's baseline, with 770 of them using the PBL model with mind mapping and 703 enrolled as controls. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of the PBL method combined with mind mapping on nursing instructions using dichotomous and continuous methods with a random or fixed effect model. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD 42022432130).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PBL model with mind mapping reached a significantly higher results of nursing knowledge test (MD: 7.29, 95% CI: 6.88-7.71, p < 0.001) and pediatric practice test (MD: 9.89, 95% CI: 9.04-10.74, p < 0.001), as well as higher students' ability of independent learning (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 2.11-5.76, p < 0.001) compared to the controls in nursing teaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PBL model with mind mapping resulted in a significantly higher results of nursing knowledge test, pediatric practice test and students' ability of independent learning compared to controls in nursing teaching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/170097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/170097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A meta-analysis of the impact of the problem-based method of learning combined with mind mapping on nursing instruction.
Background: Nowadays, there are a variety of viewpoints on problem-based learning (PBL) and mind mapping teaching outcomes in nursing education, but there are not many thorough assessments that are pertinent.
Objectives: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the PBL method combined with mind mapping on nursing instruction.
Material and methods: A systematic literature search up to July 2022 was performed, and 1765 related studies were evaluated. The chosen studies comprised 1473 nursing teaching participants as the trial's baseline, with 770 of them using the PBL model with mind mapping and 703 enrolled as controls. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of the PBL method combined with mind mapping on nursing instructions using dichotomous and continuous methods with a random or fixed effect model. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD 42022432130).
Results: The PBL model with mind mapping reached a significantly higher results of nursing knowledge test (MD: 7.29, 95% CI: 6.88-7.71, p < 0.001) and pediatric practice test (MD: 9.89, 95% CI: 9.04-10.74, p < 0.001), as well as higher students' ability of independent learning (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 2.11-5.76, p < 0.001) compared to the controls in nursing teaching.
Conclusion: The PBL model with mind mapping resulted in a significantly higher results of nursing knowledge test, pediatric practice test and students' ability of independent learning compared to controls in nursing teaching.
期刊介绍：
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly.
Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff.
Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj.
Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker.
The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus.
Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
