用于检测儿童肘部骨折和关节积液的人工智能解决方案的外部验证。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Michel Dupuis , Léo Delbos , Alexandra Rouquette , Catherine Adamsbaum , Raphaël Veil
{"title":"用于检测儿童肘部骨折和关节积液的人工智能解决方案的外部验证。","authors":"Michel Dupuis ,&nbsp;Léo Delbos ,&nbsp;Alexandra Rouquette ,&nbsp;Catherine Adamsbaum ,&nbsp;Raphaël Veil","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2023.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to conduct an external validation of an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for the detection of elbow fractures and joint effusions using radiographs from a real-life cohort of children.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 radiographic sets (1637 images) obtained from consecutive emergency room visits of 712 children (mean age, 7.27 ± 3.97 [standard deviation] years; age range, 7 months and 10 days to 15 years and 10 months), referred for a trauma of the elbow. For each set, fracture and/or effusion detection by eleven senior radiologists (reference standard) and AI solution was recorded. Diagnostic performance of the AI solution was measured via four different approaches: fracture detection (presence/absence of fracture as binary variable), fracture enumeration, fracture localization and lesion detection (fracture and/or a joint effusion used as constructed binary variable).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity of the AI solution for each of the four approaches was &gt;89%. Greatest sensitivity of the AI solution was obtained for lesion detection (95.0%; 95% confidence interval: 92.1–96.9). The specificity of the AI solution ranged between 63% (for lesion detection) and 77% (for fracture detection). For all four approaches, the negative predictive values were &gt;92% and the positive predictive values ranged between 54% (for fracture enumeration and localization) and 73% (for lesion detection). Specificity was lower for plastered children for all approaches (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AI solution demonstrates high performances for detecting elbow's fracture and/or joint effusion in children. However, in our context of use, 8% of the radiographic sets ruled-out by the algorithm concerned children with a genuine traumatic elbow lesion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of an artificial intelligence solution for the detection of elbow fractures and joint effusions in children\",\"authors\":\"Michel Dupuis ,&nbsp;Léo Delbos ,&nbsp;Alexandra Rouquette ,&nbsp;Catherine Adamsbaum ,&nbsp;Raphaël Veil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diii.2023.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to conduct an external validation of an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for the detection of elbow fractures and joint effusions using radiographs from a real-life cohort of children.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 radiographic sets (1637 images) obtained from consecutive emergency room visits of 712 children (mean age, 7.27 ± 3.97 [standard deviation] years; age range, 7 months and 10 days to 15 years and 10 months), referred for a trauma of the elbow. For each set, fracture and/or effusion detection by eleven senior radiologists (reference standard) and AI solution was recorded. Diagnostic performance of the AI solution was measured via four different approaches: fracture detection (presence/absence of fracture as binary variable), fracture enumeration, fracture localization and lesion detection (fracture and/or a joint effusion used as constructed binary variable).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity of the AI solution for each of the four approaches was &gt;89%. Greatest sensitivity of the AI solution was obtained for lesion detection (95.0%; 95% confidence interval: 92.1–96.9). The specificity of the AI solution ranged between 63% (for lesion detection) and 77% (for fracture detection). For all four approaches, the negative predictive values were &gt;92% and the positive predictive values ranged between 54% (for fracture enumeration and localization) and 73% (for lesion detection). Specificity was lower for plastered children for all approaches (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AI solution demonstrates high performances for detecting elbow's fracture and/or joint effusion in children. However, in our context of use, 8% of the radiographic sets ruled-out by the algorithm concerned children with a genuine traumatic elbow lesion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211568423001973\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211568423001973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是对一种人工智能(AI)解决方案进行外部验证,该解决方案用于使用真实儿童队列的射线照片检测肘部骨折和关节积液。材料和方法:这项单中心回顾性研究对712名儿童(平均年龄7.27±3.97[标准差]岁;年龄范围7个月零10天至15岁零10个月)的连续急诊室就诊中获得的758组(1637张图像)进行了回顾性研究。对于每组,记录11名资深放射科医生的骨折和/或积液检测(参考标准)和AI溶液。通过四种不同的方法测量AI解决方案的诊断性能:骨折检测(作为二元变量的有无骨折)、骨折计数、骨折定位和病变检测(作为构建的二元变量使用骨折和/或关节积液)。结果:AI解决方案对四种方法的敏感性均>89%。AI溶液对病变检测的敏感性最高(95.0%;95%置信区间:92.1-96.9)。AI溶液的特异性在63%(病变检测)和77%(骨折检测)之间。对于所有四种方法,阴性预测值均>92%,阳性预测值介于54%(骨折计数和定位)和73%(病变检测)之间。所有入路对涂抹石膏儿童的特异性较低(P<0.001)。结论:AI溶液在检测儿童肘关节骨折和/或关节积液方面具有较高的性能。然而,在我们的使用背景下,该算法排除的8%的放射学集合涉及患有真正创伤性肘部损伤的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External validation of an artificial intelligence solution for the detection of elbow fractures and joint effusions in children

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to conduct an external validation of an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for the detection of elbow fractures and joint effusions using radiographs from a real-life cohort of children.

Materials and methods

This single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 radiographic sets (1637 images) obtained from consecutive emergency room visits of 712 children (mean age, 7.27 ± 3.97 [standard deviation] years; age range, 7 months and 10 days to 15 years and 10 months), referred for a trauma of the elbow. For each set, fracture and/or effusion detection by eleven senior radiologists (reference standard) and AI solution was recorded. Diagnostic performance of the AI solution was measured via four different approaches: fracture detection (presence/absence of fracture as binary variable), fracture enumeration, fracture localization and lesion detection (fracture and/or a joint effusion used as constructed binary variable).

Results

The sensitivity of the AI solution for each of the four approaches was >89%. Greatest sensitivity of the AI solution was obtained for lesion detection (95.0%; 95% confidence interval: 92.1–96.9). The specificity of the AI solution ranged between 63% (for lesion detection) and 77% (for fracture detection). For all four approaches, the negative predictive values were >92% and the positive predictive values ranged between 54% (for fracture enumeration and localization) and 73% (for lesion detection). Specificity was lower for plastered children for all approaches (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The AI solution demonstrates high performances for detecting elbow's fracture and/or joint effusion in children. However, in our context of use, 8% of the radiographic sets ruled-out by the algorithm concerned children with a genuine traumatic elbow lesion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
29.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
11 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging accepts publications originating from any part of the world based only on their scientific merit. The Journal focuses on illustrated articles with great iconographic topics and aims at aiding sharpening clinical decision-making skills as well as following high research topics. All articles are published in English. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging publishes editorials, technical notes, letters, original and review articles on abdominal, breast, cancer, cardiac, emergency, forensic medicine, head and neck, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, interventional, obstetric, pediatric, thoracic and vascular imaging, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, as well as contrast material, computer developments, health policies and practice, and medical physics relevant to imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信