Barry Tannen , Emma Karlin , Kenneth J. Ciuffreda , Noah Tannen , John Shelley-Tremblay
{"title":"距离水平融合设施(DFF):一种针对获得性脑损伤(ABI)人群的新诊断收敛性测试。","authors":"Barry Tannen , Emma Karlin , Kenneth J. Ciuffreda , Noah Tannen , John Shelley-Tremblay","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To report the retrospectively-based, clinical diagnostic findings for the horizontal, distance, fusional facility (DFF) test in the non-TBI (traumatic brain inury), ABI (acquired brain injury) population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The DFF test (4 pd base-out/2 pd base-in) was assessed and compared retrospectively in the first author's optometric practice in three clinical populations: (1) post-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (<em>n</em> = 52), (2) post-ABI, non-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (<em>n</em> = 34), and (3) visually-normal, visually asymptomatic (<em>n</em> = 44).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DFF values in each group were significantly different from each other (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The mean non-TBI, ABI group value was significantly lower than found in the mTBI group, and both were significantly lower than the mean found in the normal cohort (<em>p</em> < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in DFF with increased age (<em>p</em> < 0.001). ROC values for the AUC ranged from excellent to acceptable (0.94–0.74).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DFF test is a new and useful way to assess horizontal, distance, dynamic, fusional facility in those with presumed non-mTBI, ABI neurological conditions to assist in its diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 100487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distance horizontal fusional facility (DFF): A new diagnostic vergence test for the acquired brain injury (ABI) population\",\"authors\":\"Barry Tannen , Emma Karlin , Kenneth J. Ciuffreda , Noah Tannen , John Shelley-Tremblay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To report the retrospectively-based, clinical diagnostic findings for the horizontal, distance, fusional facility (DFF) test in the non-TBI (traumatic brain inury), ABI (acquired brain injury) population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The DFF test (4 pd base-out/2 pd base-in) was assessed and compared retrospectively in the first author's optometric practice in three clinical populations: (1) post-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (<em>n</em> = 52), (2) post-ABI, non-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (<em>n</em> = 34), and (3) visually-normal, visually asymptomatic (<em>n</em> = 44).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DFF values in each group were significantly different from each other (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The mean non-TBI, ABI group value was significantly lower than found in the mTBI group, and both were significantly lower than the mean found in the normal cohort (<em>p</em> < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in DFF with increased age (<em>p</em> < 0.001). ROC values for the AUC ranged from excellent to acceptable (0.94–0.74).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DFF test is a new and useful way to assess horizontal, distance, dynamic, fusional facility in those with presumed non-mTBI, ABI neurological conditions to assist in its diagnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Distance horizontal fusional facility (DFF): A new diagnostic vergence test for the acquired brain injury (ABI) population
Purpose
To report the retrospectively-based, clinical diagnostic findings for the horizontal, distance, fusional facility (DFF) test in the non-TBI (traumatic brain inury), ABI (acquired brain injury) population.
Methods
The DFF test (4 pd base-out/2 pd base-in) was assessed and compared retrospectively in the first author's optometric practice in three clinical populations: (1) post-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (n = 52), (2) post-ABI, non-mTBI, visually-symptomatic (n = 34), and (3) visually-normal, visually asymptomatic (n = 44).
Results
The DFF values in each group were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). The mean non-TBI, ABI group value was significantly lower than found in the mTBI group, and both were significantly lower than the mean found in the normal cohort (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in DFF with increased age (p < 0.001). ROC values for the AUC ranged from excellent to acceptable (0.94–0.74).
Conclusion
The DFF test is a new and useful way to assess horizontal, distance, dynamic, fusional facility in those with presumed non-mTBI, ABI neurological conditions to assist in its diagnosis.