胃食管反流病维持治疗的真实处方模式和患者满意度:一项观察、横断面、多中心研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cheal Wung Huh, Nak Hoon Son, Young Hoon Youn, Da Hyun Jung, Min Kyung Kim, Eun Jeong Gong, Kyu Chan Huh, Seung Young Kim, Moo In Park, Ju Yup Lee, Joong Goo Kwon, Jae Hak Kim, Cheol Min Shin, Kee Wook Jung, Su Jin Hong, Hee Man Kim, Suck Chei Choi, Hye-Kyung Jung, Hyun Jin Kim, Kwang Jae Lee
{"title":"胃食管反流病维持治疗的真实处方模式和患者满意度:一项观察、横断面、多中心研究。","authors":"Cheal Wung Huh,&nbsp;Nak Hoon Son,&nbsp;Young Hoon Youn,&nbsp;Da Hyun Jung,&nbsp;Min Kyung Kim,&nbsp;Eun Jeong Gong,&nbsp;Kyu Chan Huh,&nbsp;Seung Young Kim,&nbsp;Moo In Park,&nbsp;Ju Yup Lee,&nbsp;Joong Goo Kwon,&nbsp;Jae Hak Kim,&nbsp;Cheol Min Shin,&nbsp;Kee Wook Jung,&nbsp;Su Jin Hong,&nbsp;Hee Man Kim,&nbsp;Suck Chei Choi,&nbsp;Hye-Kyung Jung,&nbsp;Hyun Jin Kim,&nbsp;Kwang Jae Lee","doi":"10.5056/jnm23088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that typically requires long-term maintenance therapy. However, little is known about patient preferences and satisfaction and real-world prescription patterns regarding maintenance therapy for GERD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved patients from 18 referral hospitals in Korea. We surveyed patients who had been prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for GERD for at least 90 days with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year. The main outcome was overall patient satisfaction with different maintenance therapy modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Overall patient satisfaction, patient preferences, and GERD health-related quality of life scores did not significantly differ among the maintenance therapy modality groups. However, the on-demand therapy group experienced a significantly longer disease duration than the continuous therapy group. The continuous therapy group demonstrated a lower level of awareness of potential adverse effects associated with PPIs than the on-demand therapy group but received higher doses of PPIs than the on-demand therapy group. The prescribed doses of PPIs also varied based on the phenotype of GERD, with higher doses prescribed for non-erosive reflux disease than erosive reflux disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although overall patient satisfaction did not significantly differ among the different PPI maintenance therapy modality groups, awareness of potential adverse effects was significantly different between the on-demand and continuous therapy groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"29 4","pages":"470-477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world Prescription Patterns and Patient Satisfaction Regarding Maintenance Therapy of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: An Observational, Cross-sectional, Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cheal Wung Huh,&nbsp;Nak Hoon Son,&nbsp;Young Hoon Youn,&nbsp;Da Hyun Jung,&nbsp;Min Kyung Kim,&nbsp;Eun Jeong Gong,&nbsp;Kyu Chan Huh,&nbsp;Seung Young Kim,&nbsp;Moo In Park,&nbsp;Ju Yup Lee,&nbsp;Joong Goo Kwon,&nbsp;Jae Hak Kim,&nbsp;Cheol Min Shin,&nbsp;Kee Wook Jung,&nbsp;Su Jin Hong,&nbsp;Hee Man Kim,&nbsp;Suck Chei Choi,&nbsp;Hye-Kyung Jung,&nbsp;Hyun Jin Kim,&nbsp;Kwang Jae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5056/jnm23088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that typically requires long-term maintenance therapy. However, little is known about patient preferences and satisfaction and real-world prescription patterns regarding maintenance therapy for GERD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved patients from 18 referral hospitals in Korea. We surveyed patients who had been prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for GERD for at least 90 days with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year. The main outcome was overall patient satisfaction with different maintenance therapy modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Overall patient satisfaction, patient preferences, and GERD health-related quality of life scores did not significantly differ among the maintenance therapy modality groups. However, the on-demand therapy group experienced a significantly longer disease duration than the continuous therapy group. The continuous therapy group demonstrated a lower level of awareness of potential adverse effects associated with PPIs than the on-demand therapy group but received higher doses of PPIs than the on-demand therapy group. The prescribed doses of PPIs also varied based on the phenotype of GERD, with higher doses prescribed for non-erosive reflux disease than erosive reflux disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although overall patient satisfaction did not significantly differ among the different PPI maintenance therapy modality groups, awareness of potential adverse effects was significantly different between the on-demand and continuous therapy groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"470-477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm23088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm23088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)是一种常见的慢性胃肠道疾病,通常需要长期维持治疗。然而,关于GERD维持治疗的患者偏好、满意度和现实世界的处方模式知之甚少。方法:这项观察性、横断面、多中心研究涉及来自韩国18家转诊医院的患者。我们调查了服用质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病至少90天、最短随访时间为1年的患者。主要结果是患者对不同维持治疗方式的总体满意度。结果:共有197名患者入选。维持治疗模式组的总体患者满意度、患者偏好和GERD健康相关生活质量评分没有显著差异。然而,按需治疗组经历的疾病持续时间明显长于持续治疗组。与按需治疗组相比,持续治疗组对PPI相关的潜在不良反应的认识水平较低,但接受的PPI剂量高于按需治疗。PPIs的处方剂量也因GERD的表型而异,非侵蚀性反流病的处方剂量高于侵蚀性反流病。结论:尽管不同PPI维持治疗模式组的总体患者满意度没有显著差异,但按需治疗组和持续治疗组对潜在不良反应的认识存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world Prescription Patterns and Patient Satisfaction Regarding Maintenance Therapy of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: An Observational, Cross-sectional, Multicenter Study.

Background/aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that typically requires long-term maintenance therapy. However, little is known about patient preferences and satisfaction and real-world prescription patterns regarding maintenance therapy for GERD.

Methods: This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved patients from 18 referral hospitals in Korea. We surveyed patients who had been prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for GERD for at least 90 days with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year. The main outcome was overall patient satisfaction with different maintenance therapy modalities.

Results: A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Overall patient satisfaction, patient preferences, and GERD health-related quality of life scores did not significantly differ among the maintenance therapy modality groups. However, the on-demand therapy group experienced a significantly longer disease duration than the continuous therapy group. The continuous therapy group demonstrated a lower level of awareness of potential adverse effects associated with PPIs than the on-demand therapy group but received higher doses of PPIs than the on-demand therapy group. The prescribed doses of PPIs also varied based on the phenotype of GERD, with higher doses prescribed for non-erosive reflux disease than erosive reflux disease.

Conclusion: Although overall patient satisfaction did not significantly differ among the different PPI maintenance therapy modality groups, awareness of potential adverse effects was significantly different between the on-demand and continuous therapy groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信