Marios Theristis, Nicholas Riedel-Lyngskær, Joshua S. Stein, Lelia Deville, Leonardo Micheli, Anton Driesse, William B. Hobbs, Silvana Ovaitt, Rajiv Daxini, David Barrie, Mark Campanelli, Heather Hodges, Javier R. Ledesma, Ismael Lokhat, Brendan McCormick, Bin Meng, Bill Miller, Ricardo Motta, Emma Noirault, Megan Parker, Jesús Polo, Daniel Powell, Rodrigo Moretón, Matthew Prilliman, Steve Ransome, Martin Schneider, Branislav Schnierer, Bowen Tian, Frederick Warner, Robert Williams, Bruno Wittmer, Changrui Zhao
{"title":"盲光伏建模相互比较:多维数据分析和经验教训","authors":"Marios Theristis, Nicholas Riedel-Lyngskær, Joshua S. Stein, Lelia Deville, Leonardo Micheli, Anton Driesse, William B. Hobbs, Silvana Ovaitt, Rajiv Daxini, David Barrie, Mark Campanelli, Heather Hodges, Javier R. Ledesma, Ismael Lokhat, Brendan McCormick, Bin Meng, Bill Miller, Ricardo Motta, Emma Noirault, Megan Parker, Jesús Polo, Daniel Powell, Rodrigo Moretón, Matthew Prilliman, Steve Ransome, Martin Schneider, Branislav Schnierer, Bowen Tian, Frederick Warner, Robert Williams, Bruno Wittmer, Changrui Zhao","doi":"10.1002/pip.3729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Modeling Collaborative (PVPMC) organized a blind PV performance modeling intercomparison to allow PV modelers to blindly test their models and modeling ability against real system data. Measured weather and irradiance data were provided along with detailed descriptions of PV systems from two locations (Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, and Roskilde, Denmark). Participants were asked to simulate the plane-of-array irradiance, module temperature, and DC power output from six systems and submit their results to Sandia for processing. The results showed overall <i>median</i> mean bias (i.e., the average error per participant) of 0.6% in annual irradiation and −3.3% in annual energy yield. While most PV performance modeling results seem to exhibit higher precision and accuracy as compared to an earlier blind PV modeling study in 2010, human errors, modeling skills, and derates were found to still cause significant errors in the estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":223,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Photovoltaics","volume":"31 11","pages":"1144-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pip.3729","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blind photovoltaic modeling intercomparison: A multidimensional data analysis and lessons learned\",\"authors\":\"Marios Theristis, Nicholas Riedel-Lyngskær, Joshua S. Stein, Lelia Deville, Leonardo Micheli, Anton Driesse, William B. Hobbs, Silvana Ovaitt, Rajiv Daxini, David Barrie, Mark Campanelli, Heather Hodges, Javier R. Ledesma, Ismael Lokhat, Brendan McCormick, Bin Meng, Bill Miller, Ricardo Motta, Emma Noirault, Megan Parker, Jesús Polo, Daniel Powell, Rodrigo Moretón, Matthew Prilliman, Steve Ransome, Martin Schneider, Branislav Schnierer, Bowen Tian, Frederick Warner, Robert Williams, Bruno Wittmer, Changrui Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pip.3729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Modeling Collaborative (PVPMC) organized a blind PV performance modeling intercomparison to allow PV modelers to blindly test their models and modeling ability against real system data. Measured weather and irradiance data were provided along with detailed descriptions of PV systems from two locations (Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, and Roskilde, Denmark). Participants were asked to simulate the plane-of-array irradiance, module temperature, and DC power output from six systems and submit their results to Sandia for processing. The results showed overall <i>median</i> mean bias (i.e., the average error per participant) of 0.6% in annual irradiation and −3.3% in annual energy yield. While most PV performance modeling results seem to exhibit higher precision and accuracy as compared to an earlier blind PV modeling study in 2010, human errors, modeling skills, and derates were found to still cause significant errors in the estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Photovoltaics\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"1144-1157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pip.3729\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Photovoltaics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.3729\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.3729","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Blind photovoltaic modeling intercomparison: A multidimensional data analysis and lessons learned
The Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Modeling Collaborative (PVPMC) organized a blind PV performance modeling intercomparison to allow PV modelers to blindly test their models and modeling ability against real system data. Measured weather and irradiance data were provided along with detailed descriptions of PV systems from two locations (Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, and Roskilde, Denmark). Participants were asked to simulate the plane-of-array irradiance, module temperature, and DC power output from six systems and submit their results to Sandia for processing. The results showed overall median mean bias (i.e., the average error per participant) of 0.6% in annual irradiation and −3.3% in annual energy yield. While most PV performance modeling results seem to exhibit higher precision and accuracy as compared to an earlier blind PV modeling study in 2010, human errors, modeling skills, and derates were found to still cause significant errors in the estimates.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Photovoltaics offers a prestigious forum for reporting advances in this rapidly developing technology, aiming to reach all interested professionals, researchers and energy policy-makers.
The key criterion is that all papers submitted should report substantial “progress” in photovoltaics.
Papers are encouraged that report substantial “progress” such as gains in independently certified solar cell efficiency, eligible for a new entry in the journal''s widely referenced Solar Cell Efficiency Tables.
Examples of papers that will not be considered for publication are those that report development in materials without relation to data on cell performance, routine analysis, characterisation or modelling of cells or processing sequences, routine reports of system performance, improvements in electronic hardware design, or country programs, although invited papers may occasionally be solicited in these areas to capture accumulated “progress”.