甲磺酸钠在胆脂瘤管壁上术中应用的评价——初步报告。

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Marta Pietraszek, Anna Bartochowska, Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Wojciech Gawęcki
{"title":"甲磺酸钠在胆脂瘤管壁上术中应用的评价——初步报告。","authors":"Marta Pietraszek,&nbsp;Anna Bartochowska,&nbsp;Małgorzata Wierzbicka,&nbsp;Wojciech Gawęcki","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.3415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Surgery is still the method of choice in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. Except for some specific clinical situations, classic canal wall up technique (CWU), remains a gold standard as a primary treatment in most departments. Unfortunately, the risk of recurrence in such an approach is estimated at 9 to even 70%. This fact prompts researchers to look for ways to reduce those unfavourable statistics. One of the recognized methods supporting the removal of cholesteatoma is the intraoperative use of mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate). This synthetic sulphur compound disrupts disulfide bridges in polypeptide chains, thanks to which it facilitates matrix preparation.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; To evaluate the effect of intraoperative use of mesna on the treatment outcomes in patients with chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma operated on by means of the canal wall up technique (CWU).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; 459 surgical reports of patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were analyzed. In total, 52 adult patients with no history of previous ear surgery operated on by means of the CWU technique by the same experienced otosurgeon with all follow-up data available were included in the study. Twenty-six were operated on with the use of mesna (mesna group) and 26 by means of the classic CWU technique (control / no-mesna group). There were 28 women and 24 men with a mean age of 41 years.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Main Outcome Measure(s):&lt;/b&gt; Postoperative hearing results and cholesteatoma recidivism rate.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Overall recidivism rate was 21.15 %. It was higher in the no-mesna (26.9%) than in the mesna group (15.4%) - although the outcomes were better in the mesna group, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.49715). Hearing gain was better in the mesna than in the no-mesna group (10 dB vs 7 dB), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.20089).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Our preliminary results show that mesna reduces recidivism rates in patients with cholesteatoma. Further study with the analysis of a larger group of patients is needed to prove it statistically.</p>","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assesment of intraoperative use of mesna in canal wall-up cholesteatoma surgery - preliminary report.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Pietraszek,&nbsp;Anna Bartochowska,&nbsp;Małgorzata Wierzbicka,&nbsp;Wojciech Gawęcki\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.3415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Surgery is still the method of choice in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. Except for some specific clinical situations, classic canal wall up technique (CWU), remains a gold standard as a primary treatment in most departments. Unfortunately, the risk of recurrence in such an approach is estimated at 9 to even 70%. This fact prompts researchers to look for ways to reduce those unfavourable statistics. One of the recognized methods supporting the removal of cholesteatoma is the intraoperative use of mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate). This synthetic sulphur compound disrupts disulfide bridges in polypeptide chains, thanks to which it facilitates matrix preparation.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; To evaluate the effect of intraoperative use of mesna on the treatment outcomes in patients with chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma operated on by means of the canal wall up technique (CWU).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; 459 surgical reports of patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were analyzed. In total, 52 adult patients with no history of previous ear surgery operated on by means of the CWU technique by the same experienced otosurgeon with all follow-up data available were included in the study. Twenty-six were operated on with the use of mesna (mesna group) and 26 by means of the classic CWU technique (control / no-mesna group). There were 28 women and 24 men with a mean age of 41 years.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Main Outcome Measure(s):&lt;/b&gt; Postoperative hearing results and cholesteatoma recidivism rate.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Overall recidivism rate was 21.15 %. It was higher in the no-mesna (26.9%) than in the mesna group (15.4%) - although the outcomes were better in the mesna group, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.49715). Hearing gain was better in the mesna than in the no-mesna group (10 dB vs 7 dB), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.20089).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Our preliminary results show that mesna reduces recidivism rates in patients with cholesteatoma. Further study with the analysis of a larger group of patients is needed to prove it statistically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.3415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.3415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

<;b>;简介:</b>;手术仍是治疗胆脂瘤型慢性中耳炎的首选方法。除了一些特定的临床情况外,经典的管壁填塞技术(CWU)仍然是大多数科室的主要治疗方法。不幸的是,这种方法的复发风险估计为9%甚至70%。这一事实促使研究人员寻找减少这些不利统计数据的方法。支持清除胆脂瘤的公认方法之一是术中使用甲磺酸钠(2-巯基乙烷磺酸钠)。这种合成的硫化合物破坏了多肽链中的二硫键,从而促进了基质的制备</br></br><;b>;目标:</b>;评价甲磺酸钠对慢性胆脂瘤型中耳炎患者术中使用甲磺酸钠治疗效果的影响</br></br><;b>;材料和方法:</b>;对459例中耳胆脂瘤患者的手术报告进行分析。总共有52名没有既往耳部手术史的成年患者被纳入研究,这些患者由同一位经验丰富的耳科医生通过CWU技术进行了手术,所有随访数据可用。26例使用mesna进行手术(mesna组),26例采用经典CWU技术进行手术(对照组/无梅斯纳组)。共有28名女性和24名男性,平均年龄41岁</br></br><;b>;主要结果度量:</b>;术后听力结果和胆脂瘤复发率</br></br><;b>;结果:</b>;总体累犯率为21.15%。无mesna组的听力增益(26.9%)高于mesna组(15.4%)-尽管mesna组结果更好,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.49715)。mesna组听力增益优于无mesna(10dBvs 7dB),但差异不具有统计学意义(P=0.0089)/br></br><;b>;结论:</b>;我们的初步结果表明mesna可以降低胆脂瘤患者的再犯率。需要对更大的患者群体进行进一步的研究和分析,以从统计学上证明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The assesment of intraoperative use of mesna in canal wall-up cholesteatoma surgery - preliminary report.

<b>Introduction:</b> Surgery is still the method of choice in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. Except for some specific clinical situations, classic canal wall up technique (CWU), remains a gold standard as a primary treatment in most departments. Unfortunately, the risk of recurrence in such an approach is estimated at 9 to even 70%. This fact prompts researchers to look for ways to reduce those unfavourable statistics. One of the recognized methods supporting the removal of cholesteatoma is the intraoperative use of mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate). This synthetic sulphur compound disrupts disulfide bridges in polypeptide chains, thanks to which it facilitates matrix preparation.</br></br> <b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the effect of intraoperative use of mesna on the treatment outcomes in patients with chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma operated on by means of the canal wall up technique (CWU).</br></br> <b>Material and methods:</b> 459 surgical reports of patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were analyzed. In total, 52 adult patients with no history of previous ear surgery operated on by means of the CWU technique by the same experienced otosurgeon with all follow-up data available were included in the study. Twenty-six were operated on with the use of mesna (mesna group) and 26 by means of the classic CWU technique (control / no-mesna group). There were 28 women and 24 men with a mean age of 41 years.</br></br> <b>Main Outcome Measure(s):</b> Postoperative hearing results and cholesteatoma recidivism rate.</br></br> <b>Results:</b> Overall recidivism rate was 21.15 %. It was higher in the no-mesna (26.9%) than in the mesna group (15.4%) - although the outcomes were better in the mesna group, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.49715). Hearing gain was better in the mesna than in the no-mesna group (10 dB vs 7 dB), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.20089).</br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> Our preliminary results show that mesna reduces recidivism rates in patients with cholesteatoma. Further study with the analysis of a larger group of patients is needed to prove it statistically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信