使用基于替代发酵的方法对作物残留物进行生物转化。

Alessandra Verardi, Paola Sangiorgio, Alessandro Blasi, Catia Giovanna Lopresto, Vincenza Calabrò
{"title":"使用基于替代发酵的方法对作物残留物进行生物转化。","authors":"Alessandra Verardi, Paola Sangiorgio, Alessandro Blasi, Catia Giovanna Lopresto, Vincenza Calabrò","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1503017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, the growing production of food commodities generates significant quantities of agroindustrial residues, most of which are untreated and disposed of as waste through either burning, dumping into the land, or unplanned landfilling, thereby causing environmental pollution, public health problems, and decreased soil organic matter and soil productivity. A literature review has been conducted on the current crop residue biomass valorization, analyzing raw material properties and the potential risks associated with its incorrect or absent management, as well as the major microbial fermentation strategies that are used for converting residual crops into valuable products. Approximately 2445.2 million tons of crop residues are produced worldwide. Microbial fermentation is an efficient way of managing residues that are rich in nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) and converting them into single-cell proteins, antibiotics, enzymes, bioalcohols, polysaccharides, fine chemicals, and others, thereby supporting a circular bioeconomy. Although separate saccharification and fermentation (SHF) represent the predominant fermentation strategy, it requires considerable equipment costs and a long process time, which can lead to the formation of contaminations and inhibitors. Alternative conversion strategies, including simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), can reduce time and production costs, contaminations, and inhibitor formation, and enhance process yields. Nevertheless, combining hydrolysis and fermentation into a single phase results in non-optimal temperature and pH. This review discusses crop residue valorization through fermentation strategies, and provides a 360-degree view of the topic. After investigating the major types of crop residues and the potential environmental risks associated with their incorrect or absent management, it analyzes the key steps in the crop residue bioconversion process, and the most common microorganisms and microbial cultures. In addition, this review reports on various examples of crop residues being converted into industrial products and analyzes the main fermentation strategies (SHF, SSF, SSCF, and CBP), highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. As a matter of fact, fermentation strategies need to be compared for their benefits and disadvantages before being implemented on a large scale. In addition, the properties and availability of the raw materials, investment, and operating costs, the skilled workforce availability, sustainability, and the return on investment all need to be evaluated. Finally, the discussion focus on future outlooks and challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioconversion of Crop Residues Using Alternative Fermentation-Based Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Verardi, Paola Sangiorgio, Alessandro Blasi, Catia Giovanna Lopresto, Vincenza Calabrò\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.fbe1503017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, the growing production of food commodities generates significant quantities of agroindustrial residues, most of which are untreated and disposed of as waste through either burning, dumping into the land, or unplanned landfilling, thereby causing environmental pollution, public health problems, and decreased soil organic matter and soil productivity. A literature review has been conducted on the current crop residue biomass valorization, analyzing raw material properties and the potential risks associated with its incorrect or absent management, as well as the major microbial fermentation strategies that are used for converting residual crops into valuable products. Approximately 2445.2 million tons of crop residues are produced worldwide. Microbial fermentation is an efficient way of managing residues that are rich in nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) and converting them into single-cell proteins, antibiotics, enzymes, bioalcohols, polysaccharides, fine chemicals, and others, thereby supporting a circular bioeconomy. Although separate saccharification and fermentation (SHF) represent the predominant fermentation strategy, it requires considerable equipment costs and a long process time, which can lead to the formation of contaminations and inhibitors. Alternative conversion strategies, including simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), can reduce time and production costs, contaminations, and inhibitor formation, and enhance process yields. Nevertheless, combining hydrolysis and fermentation into a single phase results in non-optimal temperature and pH. This review discusses crop residue valorization through fermentation strategies, and provides a 360-degree view of the topic. After investigating the major types of crop residues and the potential environmental risks associated with their incorrect or absent management, it analyzes the key steps in the crop residue bioconversion process, and the most common microorganisms and microbial cultures. In addition, this review reports on various examples of crop residues being converted into industrial products and analyzes the main fermentation strategies (SHF, SSF, SSCF, and CBP), highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. As a matter of fact, fermentation strategies need to be compared for their benefits and disadvantages before being implemented on a large scale. In addition, the properties and availability of the raw materials, investment, and operating costs, the skilled workforce availability, sustainability, and the return on investment all need to be evaluated. Finally, the discussion focus on future outlooks and challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1503017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1503017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,不断增长的粮食商品生产产生了大量的农业工业残留物,其中大多数未经处理,并通过焚烧、倾倒到土地上或计划外填埋作为废物处理,从而造成环境污染、公共卫生问题,并降低土壤有机质和土壤生产力。对当前作物残留生物量的定价进行了文献综述,分析了原材料特性及其管理不当或缺失的潜在风险,以及用于将残留作物转化为有价值产品的主要微生物发酵策略。全世界大约产生24.452亿吨作物残留物。微生物发酵是一种有效的方法,可以管理富含营养物质(如氮、磷和钾)的残留物,并将其转化为单细胞蛋白质、抗生素、酶、生物醇、多糖、精细化学品等,从而支持循环生物经济。尽管分离糖化和发酵(SHF)是主要的发酵策略,但它需要相当大的设备成本和较长的工艺时间,这可能导致污染物和抑制剂的形成。替代转化策略,包括同时糖化和发酵(SSF)、同时糖化和共发酵(SSCF)以及联合生物加工(CBP),可以减少时间和生产成本、污染和抑制剂的形成,并提高工艺产量。然而,将水解和发酵结合到一个阶段会导致非最佳温度和pH。这篇综述讨论了通过发酵策略对作物残渣进行估价,并提供了对该主题的360度看法。在调查了主要类型的作物残留物及其管理不当或缺失带来的潜在环境风险后,它分析了作物残留物生物转化过程中的关键步骤,以及最常见的微生物和微生物培养物。此外,本综述报告了作物残留物转化为工业产品的各种例子,并分析了主要的发酵策略(SHF、SSF、SSCF和CBP),强调了它们的优势和劣势。事实上,在大规模实施发酵策略之前,需要对其优缺点进行比较。此外,原材料的性质和可用性、投资和运营成本、熟练劳动力的可用性、可持续性和投资回报率都需要进行评估。最后,讨论的重点是未来前景和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioconversion of Crop Residues Using Alternative Fermentation-Based Approaches.

Globally, the growing production of food commodities generates significant quantities of agroindustrial residues, most of which are untreated and disposed of as waste through either burning, dumping into the land, or unplanned landfilling, thereby causing environmental pollution, public health problems, and decreased soil organic matter and soil productivity. A literature review has been conducted on the current crop residue biomass valorization, analyzing raw material properties and the potential risks associated with its incorrect or absent management, as well as the major microbial fermentation strategies that are used for converting residual crops into valuable products. Approximately 2445.2 million tons of crop residues are produced worldwide. Microbial fermentation is an efficient way of managing residues that are rich in nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) and converting them into single-cell proteins, antibiotics, enzymes, bioalcohols, polysaccharides, fine chemicals, and others, thereby supporting a circular bioeconomy. Although separate saccharification and fermentation (SHF) represent the predominant fermentation strategy, it requires considerable equipment costs and a long process time, which can lead to the formation of contaminations and inhibitors. Alternative conversion strategies, including simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), can reduce time and production costs, contaminations, and inhibitor formation, and enhance process yields. Nevertheless, combining hydrolysis and fermentation into a single phase results in non-optimal temperature and pH. This review discusses crop residue valorization through fermentation strategies, and provides a 360-degree view of the topic. After investigating the major types of crop residues and the potential environmental risks associated with their incorrect or absent management, it analyzes the key steps in the crop residue bioconversion process, and the most common microorganisms and microbial cultures. In addition, this review reports on various examples of crop residues being converted into industrial products and analyzes the main fermentation strategies (SHF, SSF, SSCF, and CBP), highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. As a matter of fact, fermentation strategies need to be compared for their benefits and disadvantages before being implemented on a large scale. In addition, the properties and availability of the raw materials, investment, and operating costs, the skilled workforce availability, sustainability, and the return on investment all need to be evaluated. Finally, the discussion focus on future outlooks and challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信