稀疏很重要吗?考察概化理论和多面粗糙度测量在稀疏评级设计中的应用。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1177/01466216231182148
Stefanie A Wind, Eli Jones, Sara Grajeda
{"title":"稀疏很重要吗?考察概化理论和多面粗糙度测量在稀疏评级设计中的应用。","authors":"Stefanie A Wind, Eli Jones, Sara Grajeda","doi":"10.1177/01466216231182148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sparse rating designs, where each examinee's performance is scored by a small proportion of raters, are prevalent in practical performance assessments. However, relatively little research has focused on the degree to which different analytic techniques alert researchers to rater effects in such designs. We used a simulation study to compare the information provided by two popular approaches: Generalizability theory (G theory) and Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) measurement. In previous comparisons, researchers used complete data that were not simulated-thus limiting their ability to manipulate characteristics such as rater effects, and to understand the impact of incomplete data on the results. Both approaches provided information about rating quality in sparse designs, but the MFR approach highlighted rater effects related to centrality and bias more readily than G theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"47 5-6","pages":"351-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Sparseness Matter? Examining the Use of Generalizability Theory and Many-Facet Rasch Measurement in Sparse Rating Designs.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie A Wind, Eli Jones, Sara Grajeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01466216231182148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sparse rating designs, where each examinee's performance is scored by a small proportion of raters, are prevalent in practical performance assessments. However, relatively little research has focused on the degree to which different analytic techniques alert researchers to rater effects in such designs. We used a simulation study to compare the information provided by two popular approaches: Generalizability theory (G theory) and Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) measurement. In previous comparisons, researchers used complete data that were not simulated-thus limiting their ability to manipulate characteristics such as rater effects, and to understand the impact of incomplete data on the results. Both approaches provided information about rating quality in sparse designs, but the MFR approach highlighted rater effects related to centrality and bias more readily than G theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"volume\":\"47 5-6\",\"pages\":\"351-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216231182148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216231182148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

稀疏评分设计,即每个考生的表现由一小部分评分者打分,在实际表现评估中很普遍。然而,相对较少的研究关注不同的分析技术在多大程度上提醒研究人员注意此类设计中的评分效应。我们使用模拟研究来比较两种流行方法提供的信息:广义理论(G理论)和多面Rasch(MFR)测量。在之前的比较中,研究人员使用了未模拟的完整数据,从而限制了他们操纵评分者效应等特征的能力,并了解不完整数据对结果的影响。这两种方法都提供了关于稀疏设计中评级质量的信息,但MFR方法比G理论更容易强调与中心性和偏差相关的评级者效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Sparseness Matter? Examining the Use of Generalizability Theory and Many-Facet Rasch Measurement in Sparse Rating Designs.

Sparse rating designs, where each examinee's performance is scored by a small proportion of raters, are prevalent in practical performance assessments. However, relatively little research has focused on the degree to which different analytic techniques alert researchers to rater effects in such designs. We used a simulation study to compare the information provided by two popular approaches: Generalizability theory (G theory) and Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) measurement. In previous comparisons, researchers used complete data that were not simulated-thus limiting their ability to manipulate characteristics such as rater effects, and to understand the impact of incomplete data on the results. Both approaches provided information about rating quality in sparse designs, but the MFR approach highlighted rater effects related to centrality and bias more readily than G theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信