低剖面可视化管腔内支架治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的安全性和有效性。

J.-W. Wang, X.-Y. Li, C.-H. Li, J.-F. Liu, H. Li, Y.-Y. Tian, B.-L. Gao
{"title":"低剖面可视化管腔内支架治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的安全性和有效性。","authors":"J.-W. Wang,&nbsp;X.-Y. Li,&nbsp;C.-H. Li,&nbsp;J.-F. Liu,&nbsp;H. Li,&nbsp;Y.-Y. Tian,&nbsp;B.-L. Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The performance of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent deployed following balloon angioplasty is unknown in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, and this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the LVIS stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery M1 segment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-five patients were enrolled with 35 atherosclerotic stenoses at the M1 segment. The stenosis was about 75% in 16 patients, 80% in 15, and 90% in the rest four. The LVIS stent was used to treat these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The success rate of stenting was 97.1%. The stenting procedure was failed in one patient because of intraprocedural dissection of the stenotic (75%) segment, resulting in a 30-day periprocedural complication rate of 2.9% (1/35). Before stenting, the stenosis rate ranged 75%–90% (mean 78.9%<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.7%), and after stenting, the diameter of the stented segment was significantly (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001) increased to 1.5–3.4<!--> <!-->mm (mean 2.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.32<!--> <!-->mm) ranging 68.2%–100% (mean 94.0%<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.8%) of the normal arterial diameter, with the residual stenosis ranging 0–31.8% (median 4.8%, IQR 2.4%–7.3%). Follow-up was performed at 6–20 months (mean 8.5) after stenting. One patient (2.9%) had occlusion of the stented M1 segment with no symptoms, and two patients (5.7%) had slight asymptomatic instent stenosis (40%) at the M1 segment, with the instent restenosis and occlusion rate of 8.6% (3/35).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The braided LVIS stent can be safely applied for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery with good safety and efficacy immediately after stenting and at follow-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"38 8","pages":"Pages 521-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis\",\"authors\":\"J.-W. Wang,&nbsp;X.-Y. Li,&nbsp;C.-H. Li,&nbsp;J.-F. Liu,&nbsp;H. Li,&nbsp;Y.-Y. Tian,&nbsp;B.-L. Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrleng.2023.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The performance of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent deployed following balloon angioplasty is unknown in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, and this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the LVIS stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery M1 segment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-five patients were enrolled with 35 atherosclerotic stenoses at the M1 segment. The stenosis was about 75% in 16 patients, 80% in 15, and 90% in the rest four. The LVIS stent was used to treat these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The success rate of stenting was 97.1%. The stenting procedure was failed in one patient because of intraprocedural dissection of the stenotic (75%) segment, resulting in a 30-day periprocedural complication rate of 2.9% (1/35). Before stenting, the stenosis rate ranged 75%–90% (mean 78.9%<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.7%), and after stenting, the diameter of the stented segment was significantly (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001) increased to 1.5–3.4<!--> <!-->mm (mean 2.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.32<!--> <!-->mm) ranging 68.2%–100% (mean 94.0%<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.8%) of the normal arterial diameter, with the residual stenosis ranging 0–31.8% (median 4.8%, IQR 2.4%–7.3%). Follow-up was performed at 6–20 months (mean 8.5) after stenting. One patient (2.9%) had occlusion of the stented M1 segment with no symptoms, and two patients (5.7%) had slight asymptomatic instent stenosis (40%) at the M1 segment, with the instent restenosis and occlusion rate of 8.6% (3/35).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The braided LVIS stent can be safely applied for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery with good safety and efficacy immediately after stenting and at follow-up.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"38 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 521-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:球囊血管成形术后应用低剖面可视化管腔内支持(LVIS)支架治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的疗效尚不清楚,本研究旨在探讨LVIS支架治疗大脑中动脉M1段颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄症的安全性和有效性。方法:35例患者被纳入M1段动脉粥样硬化狭窄的研究。16例患者的狭窄率约为75%,15例为80%,其余4例为90%。LVIS支架用于治疗这些患者。结果:支架置入成功率为97.1%,其中1例因术中剥离狭窄段(75%)而失败,导致30天围手术期并发症发生率为2.9%(1/35)。支架置入前狭窄率为75%-90%(平均78.9%±4.7%),支架置入后支架段直径明显缩小(P结论:编织型LVIS支架可安全应用于治疗大脑中动脉颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄,支架置入术后即刻及随访安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

Purpose

The performance of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent deployed following balloon angioplasty is unknown in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, and this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the LVIS stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery M1 segment.

Methods

Thirty-five patients were enrolled with 35 atherosclerotic stenoses at the M1 segment. The stenosis was about 75% in 16 patients, 80% in 15, and 90% in the rest four. The LVIS stent was used to treat these patients.

Results

The success rate of stenting was 97.1%. The stenting procedure was failed in one patient because of intraprocedural dissection of the stenotic (75%) segment, resulting in a 30-day periprocedural complication rate of 2.9% (1/35). Before stenting, the stenosis rate ranged 75%–90% (mean 78.9% ± 4.7%), and after stenting, the diameter of the stented segment was significantly (P < 0.0001) increased to 1.5–3.4 mm (mean 2.1 ± 0.32 mm) ranging 68.2%–100% (mean 94.0% ± 5.8%) of the normal arterial diameter, with the residual stenosis ranging 0–31.8% (median 4.8%, IQR 2.4%–7.3%). Follow-up was performed at 6–20 months (mean 8.5) after stenting. One patient (2.9%) had occlusion of the stented M1 segment with no symptoms, and two patients (5.7%) had slight asymptomatic instent stenosis (40%) at the M1 segment, with the instent restenosis and occlusion rate of 8.6% (3/35).

Conclusion

The braided LVIS stent can be safely applied for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery with good safety and efficacy immediately after stenting and at follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信