{"title":"孕妇护士轮班工作经验的定性系统评价。","authors":"Narumi Ooshige, Eriko Matsunaka, Shingo Ueki, Sayuka Takuma","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work-pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022309674.</p><p><strong>Supplemental digital content: </strong>A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2313-2341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnant nurses' experiences of working shifts: a qualitative systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Narumi Ooshige, Eriko Matsunaka, Shingo Ueki, Sayuka Takuma\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-23-00184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work-pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022309674.</p><p><strong>Supplemental digital content: </strong>A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2313-2341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本系统综述旨在总结孕期轮班护士的经验。纳入标准:这项综述包括关注怀孕注册护士的经历的研究,无论其资质水平如何,在任何国家的任何工作场所轮班工作,包括医院、疗养院设施或诊所。未参与直接护理的护士(如高级实习护士、行政人员、教育工作者)被排除在外。方法:采用JBI方法进行定性系统评价。通过CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE(EBSCOhosts)、PsycINFO(EBSCOhost)、Igaku Chuo Zasshi(日本医学文摘社)和JBI Evidence Synthesis搜索已发表和灰色文献。没有语言限制,日期限制定为2013年至2021年。两名独立评审员进行了数据收集、提取、批判性评估和分析。使用不一致和可信的研究结果来开发类别,然后对这些类别进行综合,以提供一组全面的研究结果,并根据ConQual进行评分。结果:包括5项定性研究(2项来自美国,2项来自日本,1项来自韩国),从中提取了23项带有叙述性插图的研究结果。在这些调查结果中,22项被评估为明确无误,1项可信,3项不受支持。根据JBI定性研究的关键评估清单,研究质量为低至中等。所有研究都采用了定性方法,包括现象学、定性描述和扎根理论方法。结果被整合为7个类别和3个综合结果。第一个综合发现是,护士在与怀孕的身体负担和威胁继续怀孕的工作环境作斗争。第二种是护士通过披露自己的怀孕情况和获得支持来实现工作与怀孕的兼容性。第三,作为一名护士的发展源于在怀孕期间继续工作。结论:孕期护士工作环境恶劣;她们在公开怀孕后得到的支持使她们能够平衡工作和怀孕;他们觉得,即使怀孕了,他们也会继续工作,从而成长为专业人士。需要更多的研究来为他们的支持系统提供信息。评审注册:PROSPERO CRD42022309674。补充数字内容:可获得本评审摘要的日语版本[http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31]。
Pregnant nurses' experiences of working shifts: a qualitative systematic review.
Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.
Introduction: Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.
Inclusion criteria: This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.
Methods: The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.
Results: Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work-pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.
Conclusions: Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.
Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022309674.
Supplemental digital content: A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31.