克罗地亚牙医和牙科学生对牙科教育满意度的测量:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mia Vrdoljak, Josip Vrdoljak, Antonija Tadin
{"title":"克罗地亚牙医和牙科学生对牙科教育满意度的测量:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Mia Vrdoljak,&nbsp;Josip Vrdoljak,&nbsp;Antonija Tadin","doi":"10.1111/eje.12954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The study aimed to determine satisfaction level with the quality of education among dental students and dentists in Croatia based on the acquired knowledge and clinical and soft skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 533 dentists and dental students. The questionnaire consisted of four sections with closed-ended questions. The first section included personal and professional data, whereas the second to fourth sections assessed satisfaction with learned basic dental, professional technical or clinal and interpersonal social or soft skills on a 5-point Likert scale. The data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-test and linear regression analysis. The significance level was set at .05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>When comparing satisfaction scores between dentists and dental students in terms of basic dental knowledge and skills learned, students showed higher satisfaction scores for the categories of “Emergency Medical Situations” (<i>p</i> = .005) and “Ergonomic Principles of Work” (<i>p</i> = .004). Dentists, on the other hand, showed higher satisfaction for the categories “Selection and use of local anaesthetics and local antibiotics” (<i>p</i> = .005, <i>p</i> = .026; respectively). For the type of technical skills from the different areas of dentistry, dentists were most satisfied with “Oral Surgery” (4.26 ± 0.85), while students were most satisfied with “Oral Medicine” (4.29 ± 0.89). Finally, when comparing satisfaction scores with social skills, dentists had lower satisfaction scores in all categories studied (<i>p</i> ≤ .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Dental students showed higher overall satisfaction than dentists. The most significant satisfaction was expressed in technical skills learned, and the most considerable dissatisfaction was recorded in the unmeasurable skills category focused on “Career management”.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"328-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring satisfaction with dental education among dentists and dental students in Croatia: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Mia Vrdoljak,&nbsp;Josip Vrdoljak,&nbsp;Antonija Tadin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eje.12954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study aimed to determine satisfaction level with the quality of education among dental students and dentists in Croatia based on the acquired knowledge and clinical and soft skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 533 dentists and dental students. The questionnaire consisted of four sections with closed-ended questions. The first section included personal and professional data, whereas the second to fourth sections assessed satisfaction with learned basic dental, professional technical or clinal and interpersonal social or soft skills on a 5-point Likert scale. The data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-test and linear regression analysis. The significance level was set at .05.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>When comparing satisfaction scores between dentists and dental students in terms of basic dental knowledge and skills learned, students showed higher satisfaction scores for the categories of “Emergency Medical Situations” (<i>p</i> = .005) and “Ergonomic Principles of Work” (<i>p</i> = .004). Dentists, on the other hand, showed higher satisfaction for the categories “Selection and use of local anaesthetics and local antibiotics” (<i>p</i> = .005, <i>p</i> = .026; respectively). For the type of technical skills from the different areas of dentistry, dentists were most satisfied with “Oral Surgery” (4.26 ± 0.85), while students were most satisfied with “Oral Medicine” (4.29 ± 0.89). Finally, when comparing satisfaction scores with social skills, dentists had lower satisfaction scores in all categories studied (<i>p</i> ≤ .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dental students showed higher overall satisfaction than dentists. The most significant satisfaction was expressed in technical skills learned, and the most considerable dissatisfaction was recorded in the unmeasurable skills category focused on “Career management”.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"328-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.12954\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.12954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:该研究旨在根据所获得的知识、临床和软技能,确定克罗地亚牙科学生和牙医对教育质量的满意度。材料和方法:对533名牙医和牙科学生进行了一项在线横断面调查。问卷由四个部分组成,其中有一些问题是封闭式的。第一部分包括个人和专业数据,而第二至第四部分以5分的Likert量表评估了对所学基本牙科、专业技术或临床以及人际社会或软技能的满意度。使用Mann-Whitney U型检验和线性回归分析对数据进行分析。显著性水平设定为.05。结果:当比较牙医和牙科学生在牙科基本知识和技能方面的满意度得分时,学生在“紧急医疗情况”类别中的满意度得分较高(p = .005)和“工效学工作原理”(p = .004)。另一方面,牙医对“局部麻醉剂和局部抗生素的选择和使用”类别表现出更高的满意度(p = .005,p = .026;分别)。就牙科不同领域的技术技能而言,牙医对“口腔外科”最为满意(4.26 ± 0.85),而学生对“口腔医学”最满意(4.29 ± 0.89)。最后,当将满意度得分与社交技能进行比较时,牙医在所有研究类别中的满意度得分都较低(p ≤ .05)。结论:口腔专业学生的总体满意度高于牙医。最显著的满意度表现在所学的技术技能上,最显著的不满记录在以“职业管理”为重点的无法衡量的技能类别上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring satisfaction with dental education among dentists and dental students in Croatia: A cross-sectional study

Introduction

The study aimed to determine satisfaction level with the quality of education among dental students and dentists in Croatia based on the acquired knowledge and clinical and soft skills.

Materials and Methods

An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 533 dentists and dental students. The questionnaire consisted of four sections with closed-ended questions. The first section included personal and professional data, whereas the second to fourth sections assessed satisfaction with learned basic dental, professional technical or clinal and interpersonal social or soft skills on a 5-point Likert scale. The data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U-test and linear regression analysis. The significance level was set at .05.

Results

When comparing satisfaction scores between dentists and dental students in terms of basic dental knowledge and skills learned, students showed higher satisfaction scores for the categories of “Emergency Medical Situations” (p = .005) and “Ergonomic Principles of Work” (p = .004). Dentists, on the other hand, showed higher satisfaction for the categories “Selection and use of local anaesthetics and local antibiotics” (p = .005, p = .026; respectively). For the type of technical skills from the different areas of dentistry, dentists were most satisfied with “Oral Surgery” (4.26 ± 0.85), while students were most satisfied with “Oral Medicine” (4.29 ± 0.89). Finally, when comparing satisfaction scores with social skills, dentists had lower satisfaction scores in all categories studied (p ≤ .05).

Conclusion

Dental students showed higher overall satisfaction than dentists. The most significant satisfaction was expressed in technical skills learned, and the most considerable dissatisfaction was recorded in the unmeasurable skills category focused on “Career management”.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信