小规模干预研究中发展评估工具的跨文化测量不变性。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Nadine Doennecke , Janin Brandenburg , Claudia Maehler
{"title":"小规模干预研究中发展评估工具的跨文化测量不变性。","authors":"Nadine Doennecke ,&nbsp;Janin Brandenburg ,&nbsp;Claudia Maehler","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Development tests are widely used in the scope of cross-cultural and comparative research to support intervention studies and health care projects concerning </span>early childhood development<span>. Therefore, it is crucial to use culturally sensitive assessment tools. A culturally adapted version of the German development test FREDI 0–3 (Maehler, Cartschau, &amp; Rohleder, 2016) was used to assess a German (</span></span><em>n</em> = 405) and an Indian (<em>n</em><span><span> = 2075) sample of children between ten and thirty-two months. Measurement invariance indicates </span>psychometric equivalence of a construct across groups and is a prerequisite for test applications in a cross-cultural setting. Confirmatory factor analyses for single cohorts per age group and multi-group measurement invariance analyses were used to examine the data equivalence of the test across groups. Weak measurement invariance could be established across both groups in all four age groups (10–14; 15–21; 22–26; 27–32 months) suggesting that the development factor was measured in the same way in both groups and accounted similarly for performance differences in the developmental subdomains for the German and the Indian sample. However, scalar and strict measurement invariance were violated in almost all group comparisons suggesting differences in scale difficulty and reliability across the German and the Indian sample. This suggests that a culture-sensitive adaptation process like it was carried out within this project is necessary but not sufficient in order to create a culturally comparable development test. It is essential to always carry out measurement invariance testing to determine the psychometric equivalence of the test and additionally reduce linguistic and cultural bias through an adaption process based on empirical proven methodological principles.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural measurement invariance of a developmental assessment tool in a small-scale intervention study\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Doennecke ,&nbsp;Janin Brandenburg ,&nbsp;Claudia Maehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Development tests are widely used in the scope of cross-cultural and comparative research to support intervention studies and health care projects concerning </span>early childhood development<span>. Therefore, it is crucial to use culturally sensitive assessment tools. A culturally adapted version of the German development test FREDI 0–3 (Maehler, Cartschau, &amp; Rohleder, 2016) was used to assess a German (</span></span><em>n</em> = 405) and an Indian (<em>n</em><span><span> = 2075) sample of children between ten and thirty-two months. Measurement invariance indicates </span>psychometric equivalence of a construct across groups and is a prerequisite for test applications in a cross-cultural setting. Confirmatory factor analyses for single cohorts per age group and multi-group measurement invariance analyses were used to examine the data equivalence of the test across groups. Weak measurement invariance could be established across both groups in all four age groups (10–14; 15–21; 22–26; 27–32 months) suggesting that the development factor was measured in the same way in both groups and accounted similarly for performance differences in the developmental subdomains for the German and the Indian sample. However, scalar and strict measurement invariance were violated in almost all group comparisons suggesting differences in scale difficulty and reliability across the German and the Indian sample. This suggests that a culture-sensitive adaptation process like it was carried out within this project is necessary but not sufficient in order to create a culturally comparable development test. It is essential to always carry out measurement invariance testing to determine the psychometric equivalence of the test and additionally reduce linguistic and cultural bias through an adaption process based on empirical proven methodological principles.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000802\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展测试广泛用于跨文化和比较研究,以支持有关幼儿发展的干预研究和医疗保健项目。因此,使用对文化敏感的评估工具至关重要。德国发展测试FREDI 0-3(Maehler,Cartschau,&Rohleder,2016)的文化适应性版本用于评估10至32个月儿童的德国人(n=405)和印度人(n=2075)样本。测量不变性表示一个结构在不同群体之间的心理测量等效性,是跨文化环境中测试应用的先决条件。每个年龄组的单个队列的验证性因素分析和多组测量不变性分析用于检查跨组测试的数据等效性。在所有四个年龄组(10-14岁;15-21岁;22-26岁;27-32个月)的两组中都可以建立弱的测量不变性,这表明在两组中以相同的方式测量发育因子,并类似地解释了德国和印度样本在发育亚域中的表现差异。然而,几乎所有的组比较都违反了标量和严格的测量不变性,这表明德国和印度样本在量表难度和可靠性方面存在差异。这表明,像在该项目中进行的那样对文化敏感的适应过程是必要的,但还不足以创建一个具有文化可比性的发展测试。必须始终进行测量不变性测试,以确定测试的心理测量等效性,并通过基于经验证明的方法论原则的适应过程来减少语言和文化偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural measurement invariance of a developmental assessment tool in a small-scale intervention study

Development tests are widely used in the scope of cross-cultural and comparative research to support intervention studies and health care projects concerning early childhood development. Therefore, it is crucial to use culturally sensitive assessment tools. A culturally adapted version of the German development test FREDI 0–3 (Maehler, Cartschau, & Rohleder, 2016) was used to assess a German (n = 405) and an Indian (n = 2075) sample of children between ten and thirty-two months. Measurement invariance indicates psychometric equivalence of a construct across groups and is a prerequisite for test applications in a cross-cultural setting. Confirmatory factor analyses for single cohorts per age group and multi-group measurement invariance analyses were used to examine the data equivalence of the test across groups. Weak measurement invariance could be established across both groups in all four age groups (10–14; 15–21; 22–26; 27–32 months) suggesting that the development factor was measured in the same way in both groups and accounted similarly for performance differences in the developmental subdomains for the German and the Indian sample. However, scalar and strict measurement invariance were violated in almost all group comparisons suggesting differences in scale difficulty and reliability across the German and the Indian sample. This suggests that a culture-sensitive adaptation process like it was carried out within this project is necessary but not sufficient in order to create a culturally comparable development test. It is essential to always carry out measurement invariance testing to determine the psychometric equivalence of the test and additionally reduce linguistic and cultural bias through an adaption process based on empirical proven methodological principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信