在中西部阿米什人中,创始人群体特异性权重可提高阿尔茨海默病多基因风险评分的表现。

IF 3.3 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
HGG Advances Pub Date : 2023-10-12 Epub Date: 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100241
Michael D Osterman, Yeunjoo E Song, Audrey Lynn, Kristy Miskimen, Larry D Adams, Renee A Laux, Laura J Caywood, Michael B Prough, Jason E Clouse, Sharlene D Herington, Susan H Slifer, Sarada L Fuzzell, Sherri D Hochstetler, Leighanne R Main, Daniel A Dorfsman, Andrew F Zaman, Paula Ogrocki, Alan J Lerner, Jeffery M Vance, Michael L Cuccaro, William K Scott, Margaret A Pericak-Vance, Jonathan L Haines
{"title":"在中西部阿米什人中,创始人群体特异性权重可提高阿尔茨海默病多基因风险评分的表现。","authors":"Michael D Osterman, Yeunjoo E Song, Audrey Lynn, Kristy Miskimen, Larry D Adams, Renee A Laux, Laura J Caywood, Michael B Prough, Jason E Clouse, Sharlene D Herington, Susan H Slifer, Sarada L Fuzzell, Sherri D Hochstetler, Leighanne R Main, Daniel A Dorfsman, Andrew F Zaman, Paula Ogrocki, Alan J Lerner, Jeffery M Vance, Michael L Cuccaro, William K Scott, Margaret A Pericak-Vance, Jonathan L Haines","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia and is estimated to affect 6 million Americans. Risk for AD is multifactorial, including both genetic and environmental risk factors. AD genomic research has generally focused on identification of risk variants. Using this information, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can be calculated to quantify an individual's relative disease risk due to genetic factors. The Amish are a founder population descended from German and Swiss Anabaptist immigrants. They experienced a genetic bottleneck after arrival in the United States, making their genetic architecture different from the broader European ancestry population. Prior work has demonstrated the lack of transferability of PRSs across populations. Here, we compared the performance of PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of Amish individuals to those derived from a large European ancestry GWAS. Participants were screened for cognitive impairment with further evaluation for AD. Genotype data were imputed after collection via Illumina genotyping arrays. The Amish individuals were split into two groups based on the primary site of recruitment. For each group, GWAS was conducted with account for relatedness and adjustment for covariates. PRSs were then calculated using weights from the other Amish group. PRS models were evaluated with and without covariates. The Amish-derived PRSs distinguished between dementia status better than the European-derived PRS in our Amish populations and demonstrated performance improvements despite a smaller training sample size. This work highlighted considerations for AD PRS usage in populations that cannot be adequately described by basic race/ethnicity or ancestry classifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/24/main.PMC10565871.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Founder population-specific weights yield improvements in performance of polygenic risk scores for Alzheimer disease in the Midwestern Amish.\",\"authors\":\"Michael D Osterman, Yeunjoo E Song, Audrey Lynn, Kristy Miskimen, Larry D Adams, Renee A Laux, Laura J Caywood, Michael B Prough, Jason E Clouse, Sharlene D Herington, Susan H Slifer, Sarada L Fuzzell, Sherri D Hochstetler, Leighanne R Main, Daniel A Dorfsman, Andrew F Zaman, Paula Ogrocki, Alan J Lerner, Jeffery M Vance, Michael L Cuccaro, William K Scott, Margaret A Pericak-Vance, Jonathan L Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia and is estimated to affect 6 million Americans. Risk for AD is multifactorial, including both genetic and environmental risk factors. AD genomic research has generally focused on identification of risk variants. Using this information, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can be calculated to quantify an individual's relative disease risk due to genetic factors. The Amish are a founder population descended from German and Swiss Anabaptist immigrants. They experienced a genetic bottleneck after arrival in the United States, making their genetic architecture different from the broader European ancestry population. Prior work has demonstrated the lack of transferability of PRSs across populations. Here, we compared the performance of PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of Amish individuals to those derived from a large European ancestry GWAS. Participants were screened for cognitive impairment with further evaluation for AD. Genotype data were imputed after collection via Illumina genotyping arrays. The Amish individuals were split into two groups based on the primary site of recruitment. For each group, GWAS was conducted with account for relatedness and adjustment for covariates. PRSs were then calculated using weights from the other Amish group. PRS models were evaluated with and without covariates. The Amish-derived PRSs distinguished between dementia status better than the European-derived PRS in our Amish populations and demonstrated performance improvements despite a smaller training sample size. This work highlighted considerations for AD PRS usage in populations that cannot be adequately described by basic race/ethnicity or ancestry classifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HGG Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/24/main.PMC10565871.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HGG Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的痴呆症类型,估计影响600万美国人。AD的风险是多因素的,包括遗传和环境风险因素。AD基因组研究通常侧重于风险变异的识别。利用这些信息,可以计算多基因风险评分(PRS),以量化个体因遗传因素而导致的相对疾病风险。阿米什人是德国和瑞士再洗礼派移民的后裔。他们抵达美国后经历了基因瓶颈,使他们的基因结构与更广泛的欧洲血统人群不同。先前的工作已经证明PRS缺乏跨人群的可转移性。在这里,我们比较了来自阿米什人全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的PRS与来自欧洲大祖先GWAS的PRS的表现。对参与者进行认知障碍筛查,并对AD进行进一步评估。通过Illumina基因分型阵列收集后,对基因型数据进行估算。根据招募的主要地点,阿米什人被分为两组。对于每组,进行GWAS,并考虑相关度和协变量的调整。然后使用来自另一个阿米什人组的权重计算PRS。PRS模型在有协变量和无协变量的情况下进行评估。在我们的阿米什人群体中,阿米什语衍生的PRS比欧洲衍生的PRSs更好地区分痴呆状态,并且尽管训练样本量较小,但表现出了改善。这项工作强调了在基本种族/民族或祖先分类无法充分描述的人群中使用AD PRS的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Founder population-specific weights yield improvements in performance of polygenic risk scores for Alzheimer disease in the Midwestern Amish.

Founder population-specific weights yield improvements in performance of polygenic risk scores for Alzheimer disease in the Midwestern Amish.

Founder population-specific weights yield improvements in performance of polygenic risk scores for Alzheimer disease in the Midwestern Amish.

Founder population-specific weights yield improvements in performance of polygenic risk scores for Alzheimer disease in the Midwestern Amish.

Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia and is estimated to affect 6 million Americans. Risk for AD is multifactorial, including both genetic and environmental risk factors. AD genomic research has generally focused on identification of risk variants. Using this information, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can be calculated to quantify an individual's relative disease risk due to genetic factors. The Amish are a founder population descended from German and Swiss Anabaptist immigrants. They experienced a genetic bottleneck after arrival in the United States, making their genetic architecture different from the broader European ancestry population. Prior work has demonstrated the lack of transferability of PRSs across populations. Here, we compared the performance of PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of Amish individuals to those derived from a large European ancestry GWAS. Participants were screened for cognitive impairment with further evaluation for AD. Genotype data were imputed after collection via Illumina genotyping arrays. The Amish individuals were split into two groups based on the primary site of recruitment. For each group, GWAS was conducted with account for relatedness and adjustment for covariates. PRSs were then calculated using weights from the other Amish group. PRS models were evaluated with and without covariates. The Amish-derived PRSs distinguished between dementia status better than the European-derived PRS in our Amish populations and demonstrated performance improvements despite a smaller training sample size. This work highlighted considerations for AD PRS usage in populations that cannot be adequately described by basic race/ethnicity or ancestry classifications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HGG Advances
HGG Advances Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信