多说话,多支持?社交网络互动和社交网络评价对社交媒体社会支持的影响。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2023-09-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S424443
Ruixia Han
{"title":"多说话,多支持?社交网络互动和社交网络评价对社交媒体社会支持的影响。","authors":"Ruixia Han","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S424443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Do more friends and more frequent interactions on social media result in more social support? The impact of variables such as interaction size and frequency on the social support individuals receive via social platforms has been studied from the perspective of social networks, and some studies have focused on the role of interaction topics from the perspective of private engagement. Little research has been done on the impact of affect control embedded in social networks. The emotion-first nature of social media and the rise of affect control theory mean that this perspective deserves attention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined 634 WeChat users by means of an online survey on variables related to social media use, such as social network size, interaction frequency, users' evaluation of network members, and personal topic involvement, and then tested the influencing mode of these variables on people's perceived social support through chain mediation analysis using Model 80 of the process in spss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Interaction size influences perceived social support by affecting personal topic involvement; (2) Interaction frequency does not directly mediate the relationship between interaction size and perceived social support, but mediates the relationship in a chain by affecting personal topic involvement; and (3) Social network evaluation not only directly mediates the relationship between interaction size and perceived social support, but also further mediates the relationship by influencing personal topic involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirmed the role of affective control in people's perceived social support through social network interactions. Those people talk about personal matters with individuals who have greater evaluation, potency, and activity in social networks are more likely to get perceived social support. The study draws our attention to the role of affection control in interpersonal relationships in the era of social media mediating people's daily interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"16 ","pages":"3857-3866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/ce/prbm-16-3857.PMC10506596.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Talk, More Support? The Effects of Social Network Interaction and Social Network Evaluation on Social Support via Social Media.\",\"authors\":\"Ruixia Han\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PRBM.S424443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Do more friends and more frequent interactions on social media result in more social support? The impact of variables such as interaction size and frequency on the social support individuals receive via social platforms has been studied from the perspective of social networks, and some studies have focused on the role of interaction topics from the perspective of private engagement. Little research has been done on the impact of affect control embedded in social networks. The emotion-first nature of social media and the rise of affect control theory mean that this perspective deserves attention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined 634 WeChat users by means of an online survey on variables related to social media use, such as social network size, interaction frequency, users' evaluation of network members, and personal topic involvement, and then tested the influencing mode of these variables on people's perceived social support through chain mediation analysis using Model 80 of the process in spss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Interaction size influences perceived social support by affecting personal topic involvement; (2) Interaction frequency does not directly mediate the relationship between interaction size and perceived social support, but mediates the relationship in a chain by affecting personal topic involvement; and (3) Social network evaluation not only directly mediates the relationship between interaction size and perceived social support, but also further mediates the relationship by influencing personal topic involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirmed the role of affective control in people's perceived social support through social network interactions. Those people talk about personal matters with individuals who have greater evaluation, potency, and activity in social networks are more likely to get perceived social support. The study draws our attention to the role of affection control in interpersonal relationships in the era of social media mediating people's daily interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"3857-3866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/ce/prbm-16-3857.PMC10506596.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S424443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S424443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:更多的朋友和更频繁的社交媒体互动会带来更多的社会支持吗?从社交网络的角度研究了互动规模和频率等变量对个人通过社交平台获得的社会支持的影响,一些研究从私人参与的角度关注互动话题的作用。很少有人研究嵌入社交网络的情感控制的影响。社交媒体的情感至上本质和情感控制理论的兴起意味着这一观点值得关注。方法:本研究采用在线调查的方法,对634名微信用户进行了社交媒体使用相关变量的调查,如社交网络规模、互动频率、用户对网络成员的评价和个人话题参与度,然后运用spss中的过程模型80,通过链式中介分析,检验了这些变量对人们感知社会支持的影响模式。结果:(1)互动大小通过影响个人话题参与度来影响感知的社会支持;(2) 互动频率并不直接调节互动大小和感知社会支持之间的关系,而是通过影响个人话题参与来调节连锁关系;(3)社交网络评价不仅直接中介了互动规模与感知社会支持之间的关系,而且通过影响个人话题参与进一步中介了这种关系。结论:研究证实了情感控制在人们通过社交网络互动感知社会支持中的作用。那些与在社交网络中具有更高评价、影响力和活跃度的人谈论个人事务的人更有可能获得感知到的社会支持。这项研究提请我们注意在社交媒体调解人们日常互动的时代,情感控制在人际关系中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

More Talk, More Support? The Effects of Social Network Interaction and Social Network Evaluation on Social Support via Social Media.

More Talk, More Support? The Effects of Social Network Interaction and Social Network Evaluation on Social Support via Social Media.

Introduction: Do more friends and more frequent interactions on social media result in more social support? The impact of variables such as interaction size and frequency on the social support individuals receive via social platforms has been studied from the perspective of social networks, and some studies have focused on the role of interaction topics from the perspective of private engagement. Little research has been done on the impact of affect control embedded in social networks. The emotion-first nature of social media and the rise of affect control theory mean that this perspective deserves attention.

Methods: This study examined 634 WeChat users by means of an online survey on variables related to social media use, such as social network size, interaction frequency, users' evaluation of network members, and personal topic involvement, and then tested the influencing mode of these variables on people's perceived social support through chain mediation analysis using Model 80 of the process in spss.

Results: (1) Interaction size influences perceived social support by affecting personal topic involvement; (2) Interaction frequency does not directly mediate the relationship between interaction size and perceived social support, but mediates the relationship in a chain by affecting personal topic involvement; and (3) Social network evaluation not only directly mediates the relationship between interaction size and perceived social support, but also further mediates the relationship by influencing personal topic involvement.

Conclusion: The study confirmed the role of affective control in people's perceived social support through social network interactions. Those people talk about personal matters with individuals who have greater evaluation, potency, and activity in social networks are more likely to get perceived social support. The study draws our attention to the role of affection control in interpersonal relationships in the era of social media mediating people's daily interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信