Joeran S Bosma, Anindo Saha, Matin Hosseinzadeh, Ivan Slootweg, Maarten de Rooij, Henkjan Huisman
{"title":"使用双参数MRI进行基于深度学习的前列腺癌症检测的报告引导伪标签半监督学习。","authors":"Joeran S Bosma, Anindo Saha, Matin Hosseinzadeh, Ivan Slootweg, Maarten de Rooij, Henkjan Huisman","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate a novel method of semisupervised learning (SSL) guided by automated sparse information from diagnostic reports to leverage additional data for deep learning-based malignancy detection in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 7756 prostate MRI examinations (6380 patients) performed between January 2014 and December 2020 for model development. An SSL method, report-guided SSL (RG-SSL), was developed for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric MRI. RG-SSL, supervised learning (SL), and state-of-the-art SSL methods were trained using 100, 300, 1000, or 3050 manually annotated examinations. Performance on detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by RG-SSL, SL, and SSL was compared on 300 unseen examinations from an external center with a histopathologically confirmed reference standard. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC analysis. <i>P</i> values for performance differences were generated with a permutation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 100 manually annotated examinations, mean examination-based diagnostic area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for RG-SSL, SL, and the best SSL were 0.86 ± 0.01 (SD), 0.78 ± 0.03, and 0.81 ± 0.02, respectively. Lesion-based detection partial AUCs were 0.62 ± 0.02, 0.44 ± 0.04, and 0.48 ± 0.09, respectively. Examination-based performance of SL with 3050 examinations was matched by RG-SSL with 169 manually annotated examinations, thus requiring 14 times fewer annotations. Lesion-based performance was matched with 431 manually annotated examinations, requiring six times fewer annotations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RG-SSL outperformed SSL in clinically significant prostate cancer detection and achieved performance similar to SL even at very low annotation budgets.<b>Keywords:</b> Annotation Efficiency, Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis, MRI, Prostate Cancer, Semisupervised Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semisupervised Learning with Report-guided Pseudo Labels for Deep Learning-based Prostate Cancer Detection Using Biparametric MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Joeran S Bosma, Anindo Saha, Matin Hosseinzadeh, Ivan Slootweg, Maarten de Rooij, Henkjan Huisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryai.230031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate a novel method of semisupervised learning (SSL) guided by automated sparse information from diagnostic reports to leverage additional data for deep learning-based malignancy detection in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 7756 prostate MRI examinations (6380 patients) performed between January 2014 and December 2020 for model development. An SSL method, report-guided SSL (RG-SSL), was developed for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric MRI. RG-SSL, supervised learning (SL), and state-of-the-art SSL methods were trained using 100, 300, 1000, or 3050 manually annotated examinations. Performance on detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by RG-SSL, SL, and SSL was compared on 300 unseen examinations from an external center with a histopathologically confirmed reference standard. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC analysis. <i>P</i> values for performance differences were generated with a permutation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 100 manually annotated examinations, mean examination-based diagnostic area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for RG-SSL, SL, and the best SSL were 0.86 ± 0.01 (SD), 0.78 ± 0.03, and 0.81 ± 0.02, respectively. Lesion-based detection partial AUCs were 0.62 ± 0.02, 0.44 ± 0.04, and 0.48 ± 0.09, respectively. Examination-based performance of SL with 3050 examinations was matched by RG-SSL with 169 manually annotated examinations, thus requiring 14 times fewer annotations. Lesion-based performance was matched with 431 manually annotated examinations, requiring six times fewer annotations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RG-SSL outperformed SSL in clinically significant prostate cancer detection and achieved performance similar to SL even at very low annotation budgets.<b>Keywords:</b> Annotation Efficiency, Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis, MRI, Prostate Cancer, Semisupervised Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估一种新的半监督学习(SSL)方法,该方法以诊断报告中的自动稀疏信息为指导,利用额外数据对具有临床意义的前列腺癌症患者进行基于深度学习的恶性肿瘤检测。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究包括2014年1月至2020年12月期间为模型开发进行的7756次前列腺MRI检查(6380名患者)。报道了一种SSL方法,即引导SSL(RG-SSL),用于使用双参数MRI检测具有临床意义的前列腺癌症。RG-SSL、监督学习(SL)和最先进的SSL方法使用100、300、1000或3050项手动注释考试进行培训。将RG-SSL、SL和SSL检测具有临床意义的癌症的性能与组织病理学证实的参考标准在来自外部中心的300次未见检查中进行比较。使用受试者工作特性(ROC)和自由反应ROC分析来评估性能。通过排列测试生成性能差异的P值。结果:在100次手动注释检查中,RG-SSL、SL和最佳SSL的基于检查的ROC曲线下诊断面积(AUC)平均值分别为0.86±0.01(SD)、0.78±0.03和0.81±0.02。基于病变的检测部分AUC分别为0.62±0.02、0.44±0.04和0.48±0.09。在3050次检查中,SL的基于检查的表现与RG-SSL的169次手动注释检查相匹配,因此需要的注释减少了14倍。基于损伤的表现与431项手动注释检查相匹配,所需注释减少了6倍。结论:RG-SSL在具有临床意义的前列腺癌症检测中优于SSL,即使在非常低的注释预算下也实现了与SL类似的性能。关键词:注释效率,计算机辅助检测和诊断,MRI,前列腺癌症,半监督深度学习补充材料可用于本文。根据CC BY 4.0许可证发布。
Semisupervised Learning with Report-guided Pseudo Labels for Deep Learning-based Prostate Cancer Detection Using Biparametric MRI.
Purpose: To evaluate a novel method of semisupervised learning (SSL) guided by automated sparse information from diagnostic reports to leverage additional data for deep learning-based malignancy detection in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 7756 prostate MRI examinations (6380 patients) performed between January 2014 and December 2020 for model development. An SSL method, report-guided SSL (RG-SSL), was developed for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric MRI. RG-SSL, supervised learning (SL), and state-of-the-art SSL methods were trained using 100, 300, 1000, or 3050 manually annotated examinations. Performance on detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by RG-SSL, SL, and SSL was compared on 300 unseen examinations from an external center with a histopathologically confirmed reference standard. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC analysis. P values for performance differences were generated with a permutation test.
Results: At 100 manually annotated examinations, mean examination-based diagnostic area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for RG-SSL, SL, and the best SSL were 0.86 ± 0.01 (SD), 0.78 ± 0.03, and 0.81 ± 0.02, respectively. Lesion-based detection partial AUCs were 0.62 ± 0.02, 0.44 ± 0.04, and 0.48 ± 0.09, respectively. Examination-based performance of SL with 3050 examinations was matched by RG-SSL with 169 manually annotated examinations, thus requiring 14 times fewer annotations. Lesion-based performance was matched with 431 manually annotated examinations, requiring six times fewer annotations.
Conclusion: RG-SSL outperformed SSL in clinically significant prostate cancer detection and achieved performance similar to SL even at very low annotation budgets.Keywords: Annotation Efficiency, Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis, MRI, Prostate Cancer, Semisupervised Deep Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
期刊介绍:
Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.