{"title":"标记集配置和刚体姿态确定。","authors":"John H Challis","doi":"10.1115/1.4063625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Image-based motion-analysis systems typically place markers on the bodies of interest. The error in determining segment attitude from these markers is a function the marker position errors, the number of markers, and the spatial distribution of the markers. The spatial distribution includes two factors: the mean square distance of these markers to their geometric center, and the degree of anisotropy in the marker distribution. The purposes of this study were to: (1) present a metric which quantifies the marker spatial distribution (anisotropic to isotropic) and (2) examine the influence of marker distribution on the accuracy of rigid body attitude determination. To test the influence of the marker distribution on body attitude determination 1000 criterion attitudes were determined. These attitudes then had to be estimated for two marker sets for which the marker distribution metric, noise levels, and root-mean-square distance of the markers were systematically varied. Anisotropic marker distributions were shown to negatively affect the accuracy of attitude determination. The influence of anisotropic marker distributions on attitude accuracy could be blunted by increasing the number of markers, increasing the root-mean-square distance of markers from their geometric center, and reducing noise levels. These results have implications for the measurement of the attitudes of body segments. For example, the ability to have a large spatial distribution of markers and a large number of markers to maximize the measurement accuracy of segment attitude is different for a small segment such as the fifth metacarpal compared with the thigh.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marker Set Configuration and Rigid Body Attitude Determination.\",\"authors\":\"John H Challis\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Image-based motion-analysis systems typically place markers on the bodies of interest. The error in determining segment attitude from these markers is a function the marker position errors, the number of markers, and the spatial distribution of the markers. The spatial distribution includes two factors: the mean square distance of these markers to their geometric center, and the degree of anisotropy in the marker distribution. The purposes of this study were to: (1) present a metric which quantifies the marker spatial distribution (anisotropic to isotropic) and (2) examine the influence of marker distribution on the accuracy of rigid body attitude determination. To test the influence of the marker distribution on body attitude determination 1000 criterion attitudes were determined. These attitudes then had to be estimated for two marker sets for which the marker distribution metric, noise levels, and root-mean-square distance of the markers were systematically varied. Anisotropic marker distributions were shown to negatively affect the accuracy of attitude determination. The influence of anisotropic marker distributions on attitude accuracy could be blunted by increasing the number of markers, increasing the root-mean-square distance of markers from their geometric center, and reducing noise levels. These results have implications for the measurement of the attitudes of body segments. For example, the ability to have a large spatial distribution of markers and a large number of markers to maximize the measurement accuracy of segment attitude is different for a small segment such as the fifth metacarpal compared with the thigh.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063625\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Marker Set Configuration and Rigid Body Attitude Determination.
Image-based motion-analysis systems typically place markers on the bodies of interest. The error in determining segment attitude from these markers is a function the marker position errors, the number of markers, and the spatial distribution of the markers. The spatial distribution includes two factors: the mean square distance of these markers to their geometric center, and the degree of anisotropy in the marker distribution. The purposes of this study were to: (1) present a metric which quantifies the marker spatial distribution (anisotropic to isotropic) and (2) examine the influence of marker distribution on the accuracy of rigid body attitude determination. To test the influence of the marker distribution on body attitude determination 1000 criterion attitudes were determined. These attitudes then had to be estimated for two marker sets for which the marker distribution metric, noise levels, and root-mean-square distance of the markers were systematically varied. Anisotropic marker distributions were shown to negatively affect the accuracy of attitude determination. The influence of anisotropic marker distributions on attitude accuracy could be blunted by increasing the number of markers, increasing the root-mean-square distance of markers from their geometric center, and reducing noise levels. These results have implications for the measurement of the attitudes of body segments. For example, the ability to have a large spatial distribution of markers and a large number of markers to maximize the measurement accuracy of segment attitude is different for a small segment such as the fifth metacarpal compared with the thigh.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.