本体填充复合材料的修复粘结强度:不同底漆和脱粘应力方向的影响。

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2023-09-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26415275.2023.2258924
Pekka Ahlholm, Frode Staxrud, Kirsi Sipilä, Pekka Vallittu
{"title":"本体填充复合材料的修复粘结强度:不同底漆和脱粘应力方向的影响。","authors":"Pekka Ahlholm,&nbsp;Frode Staxrud,&nbsp;Kirsi Sipilä,&nbsp;Pekka Vallittu","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2023.2258924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to evaluate the effect of different adhesion primers on the repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite and short-term hydrolytic stability of the repair interface before and after accelerated aging. In addition, direction of debonding stress was examined.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bulk-fill substrates were aged in water for 14 days at 37 °C. Smooth resin composite surfaces were prepared for the substrates with a superfine grinding paper (FEPA #500, #1200, #2000). Test specimens were produced by attaching bulk-fill composite to the substrate surfaces, using three different primer/bonding systems. Specimens were aged 24 h at 37 °C in water, or thermal cycled (5-55 °C/5,000 cycles). Subsequently, shear bond strength and micro-tensile bond strength were evaluated. In total there were 60 specimens for the shear bond strength and 60 specimens for the micro-tensile bond strength measurements (30 stored in water 24 h, 30 thermal cycled, <i>n</i> = 10 in each primer/bonding mode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean shear bond strength was 9.1-13.1 MPa after 24 h water storage and 6.9-10.7 MPa after thermal cycling. The mean micro-tensile bond strength was 28.7-45.8 MPa after 24 h water storage and 22.7-37.9 MPa after thermal cycling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ceramic primer (silane containing) seems to perform better than the three-step etch and rinse adhesive or the Composite primer. Shear-type stress had an adverse effect on the repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"2258924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/63/IABO_10_2258924.PMC10519262.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repair bond strength of bulk-fill composites: influence of different primers and direction of debonding stress.\",\"authors\":\"Pekka Ahlholm,&nbsp;Frode Staxrud,&nbsp;Kirsi Sipilä,&nbsp;Pekka Vallittu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26415275.2023.2258924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to evaluate the effect of different adhesion primers on the repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite and short-term hydrolytic stability of the repair interface before and after accelerated aging. In addition, direction of debonding stress was examined.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bulk-fill substrates were aged in water for 14 days at 37 °C. Smooth resin composite surfaces were prepared for the substrates with a superfine grinding paper (FEPA #500, #1200, #2000). Test specimens were produced by attaching bulk-fill composite to the substrate surfaces, using three different primer/bonding systems. Specimens were aged 24 h at 37 °C in water, or thermal cycled (5-55 °C/5,000 cycles). Subsequently, shear bond strength and micro-tensile bond strength were evaluated. In total there were 60 specimens for the shear bond strength and 60 specimens for the micro-tensile bond strength measurements (30 stored in water 24 h, 30 thermal cycled, <i>n</i> = 10 in each primer/bonding mode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean shear bond strength was 9.1-13.1 MPa after 24 h water storage and 6.9-10.7 MPa after thermal cycling. The mean micro-tensile bond strength was 28.7-45.8 MPa after 24 h water storage and 22.7-37.9 MPa after thermal cycling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ceramic primer (silane containing) seems to perform better than the three-step etch and rinse adhesive or the Composite primer. Shear-type stress had an adverse effect on the repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2258924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/63/IABO_10_2258924.PMC10519262.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2258924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2258924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本体外研究的目的是评估不同粘附引物对本体填充树脂复合材料修复结合强度和加速老化前后修复界面短期水解稳定性的影响。此外,还研究了脱粘应力的方向。材料和方法:散装填充基底在水中老化14 第37天 °C。用超细砂纸(FEPA#500、#1200、#2000)为基材制备光滑的树脂复合材料表面。通过使用三种不同的底漆/粘合系统将大块填充复合材料附着到基底表面来制备试样。样本年龄为24岁 h在37 水中°C,或热循环(5-55 °C/5000次循环)。随后,对剪切结合强度和微观拉伸结合强度进行了评估。总共有60个剪切结合强度试样和60个微观拉伸结合强度测量试样(30个储存在水中24 h、 30热循环,n = 结果:平均剪切结合强度为9.1-13.1 24后MPa h蓄水量和6.9-10.7 热循环后的MPa。平均微观拉伸结合强度为28.7-45.8 24后MPa h蓄水量和22.7-37.9 热循环后的MPa。结论:陶瓷底漆(含硅烷)的性能优于三步蚀刻漂洗胶或复合底漆。剪切型应力对本体填充树脂复合材料的修复粘结强度有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Repair bond strength of bulk-fill composites: influence of different primers and direction of debonding stress.

Repair bond strength of bulk-fill composites: influence of different primers and direction of debonding stress.

Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different adhesion primers on the repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite and short-term hydrolytic stability of the repair interface before and after accelerated aging. In addition, direction of debonding stress was examined.

Materials and methods: Bulk-fill substrates were aged in water for 14 days at 37 °C. Smooth resin composite surfaces were prepared for the substrates with a superfine grinding paper (FEPA #500, #1200, #2000). Test specimens were produced by attaching bulk-fill composite to the substrate surfaces, using three different primer/bonding systems. Specimens were aged 24 h at 37 °C in water, or thermal cycled (5-55 °C/5,000 cycles). Subsequently, shear bond strength and micro-tensile bond strength were evaluated. In total there were 60 specimens for the shear bond strength and 60 specimens for the micro-tensile bond strength measurements (30 stored in water 24 h, 30 thermal cycled, n = 10 in each primer/bonding mode).

Results: The mean shear bond strength was 9.1-13.1 MPa after 24 h water storage and 6.9-10.7 MPa after thermal cycling. The mean micro-tensile bond strength was 28.7-45.8 MPa after 24 h water storage and 22.7-37.9 MPa after thermal cycling.

Conclusion: The Ceramic primer (silane containing) seems to perform better than the three-step etch and rinse adhesive or the Composite primer. Shear-type stress had an adverse effect on the repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信