用于立即淋巴重建的淋巴耦合器辅助旁路(CAB)。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2181-7559
Daisy L Spoer, Lauren E Berger, Parhom N Towfighi, Romina Deldar, Nisha Gupta, Samuel S Huffman, Banafsheh Sharif-Askary, Kenneth L Fan, Rajiv P Parikh, Laura K Tom
{"title":"用于立即淋巴重建的淋巴耦合器辅助旁路(CAB)。","authors":"Daisy L Spoer, Lauren E Berger, Parhom N Towfighi, Romina Deldar, Nisha Gupta, Samuel S Huffman, Banafsheh Sharif-Askary, Kenneth L Fan, Rajiv P Parikh, Laura K Tom","doi":"10.1055/a-2181-7559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the \"standard\" end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via \"CAB\" and 39 lymphatics via \"standard\" end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, <i>p</i> = 0.0170).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphovenous Coupler-Assisted Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Daisy L Spoer, Lauren E Berger, Parhom N Towfighi, Romina Deldar, Nisha Gupta, Samuel S Huffman, Banafsheh Sharif-Askary, Kenneth L Fan, Rajiv P Parikh, Laura K Tom\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2181-7559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the \\\"standard\\\" end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via \\\"CAB\\\" and 39 lymphatics via \\\"standard\\\" end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, <i>p</i> = 0.0170).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-7559\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-7559","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿是美国淋巴水肿最常见的原因,在接受腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的患者中,高达50%的患者会出现这种情况。ALND时的淋巴管搭桥术(LVB)可以预防淋巴水肿,但长期结果和吻合口通畅性尚不清楚。本研究评估了通过耦合器辅助搭桥术(CAB)进行即时淋巴重建的可行性和结果。方法:这是对2018-2022年间在两个三级护理中心接受ALND预防性LVB的所有患者的回顾性审查。根据患者是否接受“标准”端到端(E-E)缝合或CAB技术,将患者分为多组。感兴趣的主要结果是淋巴水肿的发展。术前和术后3、6、12和24个月对淋巴水肿进行定量和定性评估。结果:总共进行了63次淋巴静脉旁路,其中24次淋巴管通过“CAB”立即重建,39次淋巴管经过“标准”端到端缝合。患者特征(包括BMI)和治疗特征(包括放射治疗)在各组之间没有显著差异。CAB与每条静脉旁路淋巴管的平均数量更大(标准1.7 vs.CAB 2.6 p=0.0001)和旁路至较大静脉的平均数量(标准1.2 vs。CAB 2.2 mm,P结论:CAB技术是标准LVB技术的一种可行、有效的技术替代方案。这项预防性LVB技术的比较研究表明,耦合器辅助旁路保持了长期的通畅性,这可能是由于易于将几个淋巴管与单个大口径静脉吻合,同时降低了手术的技术要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lymphovenous Coupler-Assisted Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction.

Background:  Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB).

Methods:  This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the "standard" end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results:  Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via "CAB" and 39 lymphatics via "standard" end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, p = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, p < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, p = 0.0170).

Conclusion:  The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信