避孕建议中与医生偏见相关的特征。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Natalie DiCenzo MD , Kristyn Brandi MD, MPH , Kylie Getz MPH , Glenmarie Matthews MD, MBA, MS
{"title":"避孕建议中与医生偏见相关的特征。","authors":"Natalie DiCenzo MD ,&nbsp;Kristyn Brandi MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kylie Getz MPH ,&nbsp;Glenmarie Matthews MD, MBA, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to examine associations between obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) contraceptive recommendations and sociodemographic characteristics of patients and recommending physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>OBGYNs affiliated with residency programs across the United States were recruited via email to participate in an online exploratory survey depicting scenarios of reproductive-age women of differing race and socioeconomic status, all other factors identical, and were asked to provide contraceptive recommendations. The χ<sup>2</sup> test, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze recommendation differences based on physician and patient characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 172 physician respondents, large proportions self-identified as white (74%) and attending physicians (56%) from the Mid-Atlantic (42%). In multivariate logistic regression, self-administered methods (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.8) and condoms (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–0.9) were recommended significantly less to Black high SES patients compared with white high SES patients. Non-white physicians recommended tubal ligation (OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.9) significantly less than white physicians, and recommended long-acting reversible contraception (OR, 3.3, CI 2.2–5.2) and condoms (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9) significantly more. Trainee physicians recommended self-administered methods (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2–0.4), condoms (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2–0.3), and tubal ligation (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3–0.6) significantly less than attending physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>OBGYN contraceptive recommendations differed based on patients’ perceived race and SES. Recommendations also differed based on race, training level, and geographic location of the recommending physician. Results suggest that physician bias contributes to contraceptive recommendations. OBGYNs should receive education about contraceptive coercion and patient-centered decision-making so that they provide high-quality counseling to all patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001378/pdfft?md5=9e67826db64d2f39c133e6d66a855f4e&pid=1-s2.0-S1049386723001378-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics Associated With Physician Bias in Contraceptive Recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Natalie DiCenzo MD ,&nbsp;Kristyn Brandi MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kylie Getz MPH ,&nbsp;Glenmarie Matthews MD, MBA, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2023.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to examine associations between obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) contraceptive recommendations and sociodemographic characteristics of patients and recommending physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>OBGYNs affiliated with residency programs across the United States were recruited via email to participate in an online exploratory survey depicting scenarios of reproductive-age women of differing race and socioeconomic status, all other factors identical, and were asked to provide contraceptive recommendations. The χ<sup>2</sup> test, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze recommendation differences based on physician and patient characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 172 physician respondents, large proportions self-identified as white (74%) and attending physicians (56%) from the Mid-Atlantic (42%). In multivariate logistic regression, self-administered methods (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.8) and condoms (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–0.9) were recommended significantly less to Black high SES patients compared with white high SES patients. Non-white physicians recommended tubal ligation (OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.9) significantly less than white physicians, and recommended long-acting reversible contraception (OR, 3.3, CI 2.2–5.2) and condoms (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9) significantly more. Trainee physicians recommended self-administered methods (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2–0.4), condoms (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2–0.3), and tubal ligation (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3–0.6) significantly less than attending physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>OBGYN contraceptive recommendations differed based on patients’ perceived race and SES. Recommendations also differed based on race, training level, and geographic location of the recommending physician. Results suggest that physician bias contributes to contraceptive recommendations. OBGYNs should receive education about contraceptive coercion and patient-centered decision-making so that they provide high-quality counseling to all patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001378/pdfft?md5=9e67826db64d2f39c133e6d66a855f4e&pid=1-s2.0-S1049386723001378-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001378\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在检验妇产科医生(OBGYN)的避孕建议与患者和推荐医生的社会人口学特征之间的关系。方法:通过电子邮件招募美国各地住院项目的妇产科医生参加一项在线探索性调查,该调查描述了不同种族和社会经济地位、所有其他因素相同的育龄妇女的情景,并要求他们提供避孕建议。采用χ2检验、Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归分析基于医生和患者特征的推荐差异。结果:在172名医生受访者中,很大一部分人自称白人(74%),而来自大西洋中部的主治医生(56%)(42%)。在多变量逻辑回归中,自我管理方法(比值比[OR],0.5;95%置信区间[CI],0.2-0.8)和避孕套(比值比,0.5;95%CI,0.3-0.9)被推荐给黑人高SES患者的次数明显少于白人高SES病人。非白人医生推荐的输卵管结扎术(OR,0.7;95%置信区间[CI],0.5-0.9)明显低于白人医生,推荐的长效可逆避孕法(OR,3.3,CI 2.2-5.2)和避孕套(OR,1.4;95%CI,1.1-1.9)明显高于白人医生。实习医生推荐的自我管理方法(OR,0.3;95%置信区间,0.2-0.4)、避孕套(OR,0.2;95%置信度,0.2-0.3)和输卵管结扎术(OR,0.4;95%置信指数,0.3-0.6)明显少于主治医生。结论:妇产科的避孕建议因患者的种族和社会经济地位而不同。推荐医生的种族、培训水平和地理位置也不同。结果表明,医生的偏见有助于避孕建议。妇产科医生应接受避孕强制和以患者为中心的决策教育,以便为所有患者提供高质量的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics Associated With Physician Bias in Contraceptive Recommendations

Objective

We aimed to examine associations between obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) contraceptive recommendations and sociodemographic characteristics of patients and recommending physicians.

Methods

OBGYNs affiliated with residency programs across the United States were recruited via email to participate in an online exploratory survey depicting scenarios of reproductive-age women of differing race and socioeconomic status, all other factors identical, and were asked to provide contraceptive recommendations. The χ2 test, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze recommendation differences based on physician and patient characteristics.

Results

Of 172 physician respondents, large proportions self-identified as white (74%) and attending physicians (56%) from the Mid-Atlantic (42%). In multivariate logistic regression, self-administered methods (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.8) and condoms (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–0.9) were recommended significantly less to Black high SES patients compared with white high SES patients. Non-white physicians recommended tubal ligation (OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–0.9) significantly less than white physicians, and recommended long-acting reversible contraception (OR, 3.3, CI 2.2–5.2) and condoms (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9) significantly more. Trainee physicians recommended self-administered methods (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2–0.4), condoms (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2–0.3), and tubal ligation (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3–0.6) significantly less than attending physicians.

Conclusions

OBGYN contraceptive recommendations differed based on patients’ perceived race and SES. Recommendations also differed based on race, training level, and geographic location of the recommending physician. Results suggest that physician bias contributes to contraceptive recommendations. OBGYNs should receive education about contraceptive coercion and patient-centered decision-making so that they provide high-quality counseling to all patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信