将感知压力量表与青少年PROMIS心理压力体验联系起来。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Maxwell Mansolf, Courtney K Blackwell, Jin-Shei Lai, David Cella
{"title":"将感知压力量表与青少年PROMIS心理压力体验联系起来。","authors":"Maxwell Mansolf, Courtney K Blackwell, Jin-Shei Lai, David Cella","doi":"10.1037/pas0001256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences-Pediatric (PPSE) are two self-report instruments that have been used with adolescents to measure subjective feelings of stress. Stress is a critical construct to evaluate, as chronic stress can result in negative long-term consequences for an individual's physical and mental health. While the PSS is more commonly used in research and clinical practice, use of the PPSE is becoming more widespread. This increased usage necessitates a way to compare the measures, for example, when changing which instrument is used in practice or when combining data from the two measures in pooled analysis. After assessing linking assumptions, we used equipercentile linking to score-link the two measures on the raw score and T-score metrics for both longer forms (10 PSS items; 8 PPSE items) and shorter forms (4 PSS or PPSE items), yielding crosswalk tables (Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/9pzyk/) to convert scores on each measure to the metric of the other. Raw scores between measures (.670 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ .794) were not sufficiently correlated for score linking. Therefore, linked scores were treated as predictions, rather than counterfactual values on the alternative measure. Further, confirmatory factor analyses revealed that this low correlation was primarily due to the low reliability and multidimensionality of the PSS, and the derived linking functions were found to have minimal bias. Recommendations for the use of these conversion tables by researchers and practitioners are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 10","pages":"888-894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking the Perceived Stress Scale to the PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences-Pediatric in adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Mansolf, Courtney K Blackwell, Jin-Shei Lai, David Cella\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pas0001256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences-Pediatric (PPSE) are two self-report instruments that have been used with adolescents to measure subjective feelings of stress. Stress is a critical construct to evaluate, as chronic stress can result in negative long-term consequences for an individual's physical and mental health. While the PSS is more commonly used in research and clinical practice, use of the PPSE is becoming more widespread. This increased usage necessitates a way to compare the measures, for example, when changing which instrument is used in practice or when combining data from the two measures in pooled analysis. After assessing linking assumptions, we used equipercentile linking to score-link the two measures on the raw score and T-score metrics for both longer forms (10 PSS items; 8 PPSE items) and shorter forms (4 PSS or PPSE items), yielding crosswalk tables (Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/9pzyk/) to convert scores on each measure to the metric of the other. Raw scores between measures (.670 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ .794) were not sufficiently correlated for score linking. Therefore, linked scores were treated as predictions, rather than counterfactual values on the alternative measure. Further, confirmatory factor analyses revealed that this low correlation was primarily due to the low reliability and multidimensionality of the PSS, and the derived linking functions were found to have minimal bias. Recommendations for the use of these conversion tables by researchers and practitioners are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":\"35 10\",\"pages\":\"888-894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001256\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感知压力量表(PSS)和PROMIS儿童心理压力体验量表(PPSE)是两种自我报告工具,已用于青少年测量主观压力感受。压力是一个需要评估的关键结构,因为慢性压力会对个人的身心健康造成负面的长期后果。虽然PSS在研究和临床实践中更为常用,但PPSE的使用也越来越广泛。这种使用量的增加需要一种方法来比较度量,例如,当改变实践中使用的工具时,或者当在汇总分析中组合两种度量的数据时。在评估了链接假设后,我们使用等百分比链接对较长形式(10个PSS项目;8个PPSE项目)和较短形式(4个PSS或PPSE项目https://osf.io/9pzyk/)将每个度量的分数转换为另一个度量的度量。测量之间的原始分数(.670≤r≤.794)没有足够的相关性来进行分数链接。因此,关联分数被视为预测,而不是替代测量的反事实值。此外,验证性因素分析显示,这种低相关性主要是由于PSS的低可靠性和多维性,并且发现推导的连接函数具有最小的偏差。提供了研究人员和从业人员使用这些转换表的建议。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linking the Perceived Stress Scale to the PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences-Pediatric in adolescents.

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences-Pediatric (PPSE) are two self-report instruments that have been used with adolescents to measure subjective feelings of stress. Stress is a critical construct to evaluate, as chronic stress can result in negative long-term consequences for an individual's physical and mental health. While the PSS is more commonly used in research and clinical practice, use of the PPSE is becoming more widespread. This increased usage necessitates a way to compare the measures, for example, when changing which instrument is used in practice or when combining data from the two measures in pooled analysis. After assessing linking assumptions, we used equipercentile linking to score-link the two measures on the raw score and T-score metrics for both longer forms (10 PSS items; 8 PPSE items) and shorter forms (4 PSS or PPSE items), yielding crosswalk tables (Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/9pzyk/) to convert scores on each measure to the metric of the other. Raw scores between measures (.670 ≤ r ≤ .794) were not sufficiently correlated for score linking. Therefore, linked scores were treated as predictions, rather than counterfactual values on the alternative measure. Further, confirmatory factor analyses revealed that this low correlation was primarily due to the low reliability and multidimensionality of the PSS, and the derived linking functions were found to have minimal bias. Recommendations for the use of these conversion tables by researchers and practitioners are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信