急诊科人员佩戴N95口罩的鼻外扩张器条的安全性和有效性。

Spartan medical research journal Pub Date : 2022-02-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.51894/001c.30215
Ariel Hawley, Mitchell Rozman, Matthew Hysell
{"title":"急诊科人员佩戴N95口罩的鼻外扩张器条的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Ariel Hawley, Mitchell Rozman, Matthew Hysell","doi":"10.51894/001c.30215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to maintain the health and safety of caregivers. This study was conducted in 2020 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of external nasal dilator strips (ENDS) coupled with N95 respirators in a sample of community hospital emergency department personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining written consent, the authors tested participants' response to exercise (i.e., walking up 10 flights of stairs) while wearing an N95 respirator, both with and without an ENDS. The authors measured participants' heart rate and respiratory effort responses over four minutes following their exercise trial. A convenience sample of these personnel also repeated their respirator fit testing while wearing an ENDS with the N95 style they had previously been fitted for.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of N = 50 participants were enrolled. Peak heart rate while wearing an ENDS was 125 beats per minute (BPM) with the ENDS versus 130 BPM without (p = 0.21). The Borg Exertion Score while wearing an ENDS peaked at 13 with the ENDS versus 14 without (p = 0.08). However, when subjects were surveyed before and after the trial upon whether they would consider using an ENDS beneath their N95 using a scale of 1-5, their interest in this significantly increased (p = 0.004). Four of the 13 (31%) participants who completed repeated fit testing while wearing the ENDS beneath their N95 respirator failed the repeat testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results first suggest that a sizable proportion of ED personnel may fail N95 fit testing while wearing an ENDS beneath the N95 mask for which they had been previously fitted. Although providers' subjective interest in use of ENDS increased, these results also demonstrate that use of an ENDS beneath an N95 respirator may not significantly increase exercise tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"30215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of External Nasal Dilator Strips with N95 Respirator Masks by Emergency Department Personnel.\",\"authors\":\"Ariel Hawley, Mitchell Rozman, Matthew Hysell\",\"doi\":\"10.51894/001c.30215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to maintain the health and safety of caregivers. This study was conducted in 2020 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of external nasal dilator strips (ENDS) coupled with N95 respirators in a sample of community hospital emergency department personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining written consent, the authors tested participants' response to exercise (i.e., walking up 10 flights of stairs) while wearing an N95 respirator, both with and without an ENDS. The authors measured participants' heart rate and respiratory effort responses over four minutes following their exercise trial. A convenience sample of these personnel also repeated their respirator fit testing while wearing an ENDS with the N95 style they had previously been fitted for.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of N = 50 participants were enrolled. Peak heart rate while wearing an ENDS was 125 beats per minute (BPM) with the ENDS versus 130 BPM without (p = 0.21). The Borg Exertion Score while wearing an ENDS peaked at 13 with the ENDS versus 14 without (p = 0.08). However, when subjects were surveyed before and after the trial upon whether they would consider using an ENDS beneath their N95 using a scale of 1-5, their interest in this significantly increased (p = 0.004). Four of the 13 (31%) participants who completed repeated fit testing while wearing the ENDS beneath their N95 respirator failed the repeat testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results first suggest that a sizable proportion of ED personnel may fail N95 fit testing while wearing an ENDS beneath the N95 mask for which they had been previously fitted. Although providers' subjective interest in use of ENDS increased, these results also demonstrate that use of an ENDS beneath an N95 respirator may not significantly increase exercise tolerance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spartan medical research journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"30215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spartan medical research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.30215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.30215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行促使人们更多地使用个人防护设备(PPE)来维护护理人员的健康和安全。这项研究于2020年进行,旨在评估外部鼻扩张器带(ENDS)与N95口罩在社区医院急诊科人员样本中的安全性和有效性。方法:在获得书面同意后,作者测试了参与者在佩戴N95口罩的情况下(无论是否佩戴ENDS)对锻炼的反应(即走10层楼梯)。作者测量了参与者在运动试验后四分钟内的心率和呼吸努力反应。这些人员的一个方便样本还重复了他们的呼吸器佩戴测试,同时佩戴了他们之前佩戴的N95型号的ENDS。结果:共有N=50名参与者被纳入研究。佩戴ENDS时的峰值心率为125次/分,而不佩戴ENDS为130次/分(p=0.21)。戴ENDS时Borg运动得分峰值为13,而不戴ENDS为14(p=0.08)。然而,当受试者在试验前后被调查是否会考虑在N95下使用ENDS时,使用1-5的量表,他们对此的兴趣显著增加(p=0.004)。在13名(31%)参与者中,有4名在N95口罩下佩戴ENDS时完成了重复合身测试,但没有通过重复测试。结论:这些结果首先表明,相当大比例的ED人员在之前佩戴的N95口罩下佩戴ENDS时,可能无法通过N95佩戴测试。尽管提供者对使用ENDS的主观兴趣增加了,但这些结果也表明,在N95口罩下使用ENDS可能不会显著提高运动耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety and Efficacy of External Nasal Dilator Strips with N95 Respirator Masks by Emergency Department Personnel.

Safety and Efficacy of External Nasal Dilator Strips with N95 Respirator Masks by Emergency Department Personnel.

Safety and Efficacy of External Nasal Dilator Strips with N95 Respirator Masks by Emergency Department Personnel.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to maintain the health and safety of caregivers. This study was conducted in 2020 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of external nasal dilator strips (ENDS) coupled with N95 respirators in a sample of community hospital emergency department personnel.

Methods: After obtaining written consent, the authors tested participants' response to exercise (i.e., walking up 10 flights of stairs) while wearing an N95 respirator, both with and without an ENDS. The authors measured participants' heart rate and respiratory effort responses over four minutes following their exercise trial. A convenience sample of these personnel also repeated their respirator fit testing while wearing an ENDS with the N95 style they had previously been fitted for.

Results: A total of N = 50 participants were enrolled. Peak heart rate while wearing an ENDS was 125 beats per minute (BPM) with the ENDS versus 130 BPM without (p = 0.21). The Borg Exertion Score while wearing an ENDS peaked at 13 with the ENDS versus 14 without (p = 0.08). However, when subjects were surveyed before and after the trial upon whether they would consider using an ENDS beneath their N95 using a scale of 1-5, their interest in this significantly increased (p = 0.004). Four of the 13 (31%) participants who completed repeated fit testing while wearing the ENDS beneath their N95 respirator failed the repeat testing.

Conclusions: These results first suggest that a sizable proportion of ED personnel may fail N95 fit testing while wearing an ENDS beneath the N95 mask for which they had been previously fitted. Although providers' subjective interest in use of ENDS increased, these results also demonstrate that use of an ENDS beneath an N95 respirator may not significantly increase exercise tolerance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信