如何评估男性饮食失调的严重程度?DSM-5严重性指数与基于驱动器的严重性对比,以实现纤薄。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-02 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1080/10640266.2023.2259682
Isabel Krug, An Binh Dang, Isabel Sánchez, Roser Granero, Zaida Agüera, Anahi Gaspar-Perez, Susana Jimenez-Murcia, Fernando Fernandez-Aranda
{"title":"如何评估男性饮食失调的严重程度?DSM-5严重性指数与基于驱动器的严重性对比,以实现纤薄。","authors":"Isabel Krug, An Binh Dang, Isabel Sánchez, Roser Granero, Zaida Agüera, Anahi Gaspar-Perez, Susana Jimenez-Murcia, Fernando Fernandez-Aranda","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2023.2259682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a male eating disorder (ED) sample, this study assessed the clinical utility of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) severity indices for males with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) and compared it to an alternative transdiagnostic severity categorisation based on drive for thinness (DT). The participants included 143 males with an ED (60 [42.0%] AN and 83 [58.0%] BN) diagnosis, who were classified using these two severity classifications. The different severity categories were then compared based on ED symptoms, general psychopathology, and personality traits. Our results revealed that the DSM-5 \"<i>mild</i>\" and DT \"low\" severity categories were most prevalent in the AN and BN male patients. Clinically significant findings were strongest for the DT categorisation for both AN and BN. The current findings provide initial support for an alternative transdiagnostic DT severity classification for males that may be more clinically meaningful than the DSM-5 severity indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"81-97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to assess eating disorder severity in males?The DSM-5 severity index versus severity based on drive for thinness.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Krug, An Binh Dang, Isabel Sánchez, Roser Granero, Zaida Agüera, Anahi Gaspar-Perez, Susana Jimenez-Murcia, Fernando Fernandez-Aranda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10640266.2023.2259682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using a male eating disorder (ED) sample, this study assessed the clinical utility of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) severity indices for males with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) and compared it to an alternative transdiagnostic severity categorisation based on drive for thinness (DT). The participants included 143 males with an ED (60 [42.0%] AN and 83 [58.0%] BN) diagnosis, who were classified using these two severity classifications. The different severity categories were then compared based on ED symptoms, general psychopathology, and personality traits. Our results revealed that the DSM-5 \\\"<i>mild</i>\\\" and DT \\\"low\\\" severity categories were most prevalent in the AN and BN male patients. Clinically significant findings were strongest for the DT categorisation for both AN and BN. The current findings provide initial support for an alternative transdiagnostic DT severity classification for males that may be more clinically meaningful than the DSM-5 severity indices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2023.2259682\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2023.2259682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用男性进食障碍(ED)样本,评估了精神障碍诊断和统计手册-5(DSM-5)严重程度指数对神经性厌食症(AN)和神经性贪食症(BN)男性的临床实用性,并将其与基于追求瘦(DT)的替代性跨诊断严重程度分类进行了比较。参与者包括143名被诊断为ED的男性(60[42.0%]an和83[58.0%]BN),他们使用这两种严重程度分类。然后根据ED症状、一般精神病理学和人格特征对不同的严重程度类别进行比较。我们的研究结果显示,DSM-5“轻度”和DT“低”严重程度类别在AN和BN男性患者中最为普遍。AN和BN的DT分类具有最显著的临床意义。目前的研究结果为男性的替代性经诊断DT严重程度分类提供了初步支持,该分类可能比DSM-5严重程度指数更有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to assess eating disorder severity in males?The DSM-5 severity index versus severity based on drive for thinness.

Using a male eating disorder (ED) sample, this study assessed the clinical utility of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) severity indices for males with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) and compared it to an alternative transdiagnostic severity categorisation based on drive for thinness (DT). The participants included 143 males with an ED (60 [42.0%] AN and 83 [58.0%] BN) diagnosis, who were classified using these two severity classifications. The different severity categories were then compared based on ED symptoms, general psychopathology, and personality traits. Our results revealed that the DSM-5 "mild" and DT "low" severity categories were most prevalent in the AN and BN male patients. Clinically significant findings were strongest for the DT categorisation for both AN and BN. The current findings provide initial support for an alternative transdiagnostic DT severity classification for males that may be more clinically meaningful than the DSM-5 severity indices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信