由研究者发起的导管指导治疗急性肺栓塞国际数据库的初步结果。

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-29 DOI:10.5603/cj.95949
Mateusz T Jermakow, Slobodan Obradovic, Pablo Salinas, Marek Roik, Boris Dzudovic, Igor Sekulic, Fernando Macaya, Jose Paredes-Vazquez, Maite Velázquez Martín, Nicolás Manuel Maneiro Melón, Djordje Nedeljkov, Jovan Matijasevic, Andrzej Łabyk, Marcin Krakowian, Jakub Stępniewski, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Piotr Pruszczyk
{"title":"由研究者发起的导管指导治疗急性肺栓塞国际数据库的初步结果。","authors":"Mateusz T Jermakow, Slobodan Obradovic, Pablo Salinas, Marek Roik, Boris Dzudovic, Igor Sekulic, Fernando Macaya, Jose Paredes-Vazquez, Maite Velázquez Martín, Nicolás Manuel Maneiro Melón, Djordje Nedeljkov, Jovan Matijasevic, Andrzej Łabyk, Marcin Krakowian, Jakub Stępniewski, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Piotr Pruszczyk","doi":"10.5603/cj.95949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial results of investigator initiated international database on catheter directed therapy of acute pulmonary embolism.\",\"authors\":\"Mateusz T Jermakow, Slobodan Obradovic, Pablo Salinas, Marek Roik, Boris Dzudovic, Igor Sekulic, Fernando Macaya, Jose Paredes-Vazquez, Maite Velázquez Martín, Nicolás Manuel Maneiro Melón, Djordje Nedeljkov, Jovan Matijasevic, Andrzej Łabyk, Marcin Krakowian, Jakub Stępniewski, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Piotr Pruszczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/cj.95949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.95949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.95949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:导管导向治疗(CDT)广泛应用于急性肺栓塞(PE)的治疗。组织了一项多中心注册,以评估其在现实生活中的应用,并确定这些程序的有效性和安全性。评估了参与中心在PE治疗经皮技术方面的当地经验。方法:设计一个基于互联网的注册中心,收集2017年至2022年间参与中心连续接受CDT治疗的PE患者的临床、超声心动图和实验室数据,95例(65.5%)为中高危PE(IHRPE)。100名(69%)患者使用专用装置进行治疗,45名(31%)受试者使用了猪尾导管。HRPE患者的PE或CDT相关住院总死亡率达到14%(7名患者),而IHRPE患者的死亡率为3.2%(3名患者)(p=0.032)。50%的PE或CD相关死亡发生在使用猪尾导管治疗的患者中。145名患者的全因死亡率为9.7%,HRPE的死亡率高于IHRPE(18%对5.3%,p=0.019)。与专用系统相比,使用猪尾导管的死亡率更高(20%对5%,p=0.01)。结论:导管导向治疗是治疗PE的真正选择。它也被用作没有溶栓禁忌症的患者的主要治疗,这表明临床实践并不总是遵循当前的PE指南。使用专用CDT系统治疗的患者的存活率高于使用猪尾导管治疗的受试者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial results of investigator initiated international database on catheter directed therapy of acute pulmonary embolism.

Background: Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed.

Methods: An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022.

Results: Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信