{"title":"AKITA®和eFlow rapid®喷雾器在健康对照组和CF患者中阿米卡星肺部给药的比较:一项随机交叉试验。","authors":"Anne-Sophie Aubriot , Guillaume Maerckx , Teresinha Leal , Sophie Gohy , Gregory Reychler","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Nebulization plays a key role in the treatment of </span>cystic fibrosis<span><span><span>. The Favorite function couple to jet nebulizers (AKITA®) emerged recently. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of the lung delivery by the AKITA® by comparing the </span>urinary concentration of </span>amikacin after nebulization with the AKITA® and the eFlow rapid®, in healthy subjects and patients with CF (PwCF).</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The two samples (healthy subjects and PwCF) were randomized (cross-over 1:1) for two nebulizations (500 mg of amikacin diluted in 4 mL of normal saline solution), with the AKITA® and with the eFlow rapid®. The primary endpoint was the amount of urinary excretion of amikacin over 24 h. The constant of elimination (Ke) was calculated based on the maximal cumulative urinary amikacin excretion plotted over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The total amount of urinary amikacin excretion was greater when AKITA® was used in PwCF (11.7 mg (8.2–14.1) vs 6.1 mg (3.7–13.3); </span><em>p</em> = 0.02) but not different in healthy subjects (14.5 mg (11.7–18.5) vs 12.4 mg (8.0–17.1); <em>p</em> = 0.12). The duration of the nebulization was always shorter with eFlow rapid® than with AKITA® (PwCF: 6.5 ± 0.6 min vs 9.2 ± 1.8 min; <em>p</em> = 0.001 – Healthy: 4.7 ± 1.3 min vs 9.7 ± 1.6 min; <em>p</em> = 0.03). The constant of elimination was similar between the two modalities in CF subjects (0.153 (0.071–0.205) vs 0.149 (0.041–0.182); <em>p</em> = 0.26) and in healthy subjects (0.166 (0.130–0.218) vs 0.167 (0.119–0.210), <em>p</em> = 0.25).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>the Favorite inhalation is better to deliver a specific amount of drug than a mesh nebulizer (eFlow rapid®) in PwCF but not in healthy subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of amikacin lung delivery between AKITA® and eFlow rapid® nebulizers in healthy controls and patients with CF: A randomized cross-over trial\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Sophie Aubriot , Guillaume Maerckx , Teresinha Leal , Sophie Gohy , Gregory Reychler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Nebulization plays a key role in the treatment of </span>cystic fibrosis<span><span><span>. The Favorite function couple to jet nebulizers (AKITA®) emerged recently. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of the lung delivery by the AKITA® by comparing the </span>urinary concentration of </span>amikacin after nebulization with the AKITA® and the eFlow rapid®, in healthy subjects and patients with CF (PwCF).</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The two samples (healthy subjects and PwCF) were randomized (cross-over 1:1) for two nebulizations (500 mg of amikacin diluted in 4 mL of normal saline solution), with the AKITA® and with the eFlow rapid®. The primary endpoint was the amount of urinary excretion of amikacin over 24 h. The constant of elimination (Ke) was calculated based on the maximal cumulative urinary amikacin excretion plotted over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The total amount of urinary amikacin excretion was greater when AKITA® was used in PwCF (11.7 mg (8.2–14.1) vs 6.1 mg (3.7–13.3); </span><em>p</em> = 0.02) but not different in healthy subjects (14.5 mg (11.7–18.5) vs 12.4 mg (8.0–17.1); <em>p</em> = 0.12). The duration of the nebulization was always shorter with eFlow rapid® than with AKITA® (PwCF: 6.5 ± 0.6 min vs 9.2 ± 1.8 min; <em>p</em> = 0.001 – Healthy: 4.7 ± 1.3 min vs 9.7 ± 1.6 min; <em>p</em> = 0.03). The constant of elimination was similar between the two modalities in CF subjects (0.153 (0.071–0.205) vs 0.149 (0.041–0.182); <em>p</em> = 0.26) and in healthy subjects (0.166 (0.130–0.218) vs 0.167 (0.119–0.210), <em>p</em> = 0.25).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>the Favorite inhalation is better to deliver a specific amount of drug than a mesh nebulizer (eFlow rapid®) in PwCF but not in healthy subjects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041223000508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041223000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of amikacin lung delivery between AKITA® and eFlow rapid® nebulizers in healthy controls and patients with CF: A randomized cross-over trial
Introduction
Nebulization plays a key role in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. The Favorite function couple to jet nebulizers (AKITA®) emerged recently. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of the lung delivery by the AKITA® by comparing the urinary concentration of amikacin after nebulization with the AKITA® and the eFlow rapid®, in healthy subjects and patients with CF (PwCF).
Method
The two samples (healthy subjects and PwCF) were randomized (cross-over 1:1) for two nebulizations (500 mg of amikacin diluted in 4 mL of normal saline solution), with the AKITA® and with the eFlow rapid®. The primary endpoint was the amount of urinary excretion of amikacin over 24 h. The constant of elimination (Ke) was calculated based on the maximal cumulative urinary amikacin excretion plotted over time.
Results
The total amount of urinary amikacin excretion was greater when AKITA® was used in PwCF (11.7 mg (8.2–14.1) vs 6.1 mg (3.7–13.3); p = 0.02) but not different in healthy subjects (14.5 mg (11.7–18.5) vs 12.4 mg (8.0–17.1); p = 0.12). The duration of the nebulization was always shorter with eFlow rapid® than with AKITA® (PwCF: 6.5 ± 0.6 min vs 9.2 ± 1.8 min; p = 0.001 – Healthy: 4.7 ± 1.3 min vs 9.7 ± 1.6 min; p = 0.03). The constant of elimination was similar between the two modalities in CF subjects (0.153 (0.071–0.205) vs 0.149 (0.041–0.182); p = 0.26) and in healthy subjects (0.166 (0.130–0.218) vs 0.167 (0.119–0.210), p = 0.25).
Conclusion
the Favorite inhalation is better to deliver a specific amount of drug than a mesh nebulizer (eFlow rapid®) in PwCF but not in healthy subjects.