肥胖和慢性肾病患者低能量饮食的可接受性、依从性、安全性和体验:一项混合方法研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Marguerite Conley MNutDiet, BSci(ExSportSci(Hons)) , Hannah L. Mayr BHsc(Nut&Diet), PhD , Mikeeley Hoch BNutDiet(Hons) , David W. Johnson MB BS (Hons, Univ Medal), FRACP, DMed(Res), FASN, FAHMS, PhD , Andrea K. Viecelli MD FRACP PhD , Helen MacLaughlin AD
{"title":"肥胖和慢性肾病患者低能量饮食的可接受性、依从性、安全性和体验:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Marguerite Conley MNutDiet, BSci(ExSportSci(Hons)) ,&nbsp;Hannah L. Mayr BHsc(Nut&Diet), PhD ,&nbsp;Mikeeley Hoch BNutDiet(Hons) ,&nbsp;David W. Johnson MB BS (Hons, Univ Medal), FRACP, DMed(Res), FASN, FAHMS, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea K. Viecelli MD FRACP PhD ,&nbsp;Helen MacLaughlin AD","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Obesity is a modifiable risk factor for chronic kidney disease<span> (CKD) progression. Low energy diets (LEDs) have not been adequately studied in people with CKD. This study aimed to explore acceptability, adherence, safety, and experiences of two LED prescriptions in adults living with obesity and CKD.</span></p></div><div><h3>Design and Methods</h3><p>In a mixed-methods study, obese adults with CKD were prescribed two LEDs (∼800 to 1000 kcal/day each), in a randomised order for 2 weeks each. One diet consisted of four meal replacement products daily (Optifast®, Nestlé Health Science) and the other two pre-prepared frozen meals (Lite n’ Easy®, Mitchell's Quality Foods). Participants received weekly dietitian support, completed daily adherence checklists (converted to % of provided meals/replacements consumed) and participated in post-intervention semi-structured interviews to capture their experience.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Nine participants were included (mean age 46.5 ± 14.3 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 64 ± 26 mL/min/1.73 m</span><sup>2</sup><span>, 4/9 male). Mean self-reported adherence was 88 ± 11% and mean 4-week weight change<span> was −7.3 ± 5.6 kg. Two participants withdrew at week two. Most frequently reported side effects were hunger and headaches. Adverse events of interest included one episode each of hyperkalaemia and hypoglycaemia. No serious adverse events occurred. Four overarching themes of patient experiences were identified: strategies used to adapt, disruption to the norm, individual preferences, and influences on acceptability.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LEDs were found to be acceptable and safe with high self-reported adherence rates. Future LED trials should include specialist diabetes management, close monitoring for hyperkalaemia and adequate support to assist with managing side effects and dietary and social adjustments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability, Adherence, Safety and Experiences of Low Energy Diets in People With Obesity and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Mixed Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Marguerite Conley MNutDiet, BSci(ExSportSci(Hons)) ,&nbsp;Hannah L. Mayr BHsc(Nut&Diet), PhD ,&nbsp;Mikeeley Hoch BNutDiet(Hons) ,&nbsp;David W. Johnson MB BS (Hons, Univ Medal), FRACP, DMed(Res), FASN, FAHMS, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea K. Viecelli MD FRACP PhD ,&nbsp;Helen MacLaughlin AD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jrn.2023.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Obesity is a modifiable risk factor for chronic kidney disease<span> (CKD) progression. Low energy diets (LEDs) have not been adequately studied in people with CKD. This study aimed to explore acceptability, adherence, safety, and experiences of two LED prescriptions in adults living with obesity and CKD.</span></p></div><div><h3>Design and Methods</h3><p>In a mixed-methods study, obese adults with CKD were prescribed two LEDs (∼800 to 1000 kcal/day each), in a randomised order for 2 weeks each. One diet consisted of four meal replacement products daily (Optifast®, Nestlé Health Science) and the other two pre-prepared frozen meals (Lite n’ Easy®, Mitchell's Quality Foods). Participants received weekly dietitian support, completed daily adherence checklists (converted to % of provided meals/replacements consumed) and participated in post-intervention semi-structured interviews to capture their experience.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Nine participants were included (mean age 46.5 ± 14.3 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 64 ± 26 mL/min/1.73 m</span><sup>2</sup><span>, 4/9 male). Mean self-reported adherence was 88 ± 11% and mean 4-week weight change<span> was −7.3 ± 5.6 kg. Two participants withdrew at week two. Most frequently reported side effects were hunger and headaches. Adverse events of interest included one episode each of hyperkalaemia and hypoglycaemia. No serious adverse events occurred. Four overarching themes of patient experiences were identified: strategies used to adapt, disruption to the norm, individual preferences, and influences on acceptability.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LEDs were found to be acceptable and safe with high self-reported adherence rates. Future LED trials should include specialist diabetes management, close monitoring for hyperkalaemia and adequate support to assist with managing side effects and dietary and social adjustments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Renal Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Renal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051227623001541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051227623001541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肥胖是慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)进展的一个可改变的危险因素。低能量饮食(LED)尚未在CKD患者中得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨两种LED处方在肥胖和CKD成年人中的可接受性、依从性、安全性和经验。设计和方法:在一项混合方法研究中,肥胖CKD成年人被随机开了两种LED(每种约800至1000 kcal/天),每次两周。一种饮食包括每天四种代餐产品(Optifast®,雀巢健康科学公司)和另外两种预制冷冻餐(Lite n'Easy®,Mitchell’s Quality Foods公司)。参与者每周接受营养师的支持,完成每日依从性检查表(转换为所提供膳食/所消耗替代品的%),并参加干预后的半结构化访谈,以获取他们的经验。结果:包括9名参与者(平均年龄46.5±14.3岁,估计肾小球滤过率64±26 mL/min/1.73m2,4/9男性)。平均自我报告的依从性为88±11%,平均四周体重变化为-7.3±5.6kg。两名参与者在第二周退出。最常见的副作用是饥饿和头痛。感兴趣的不良事件包括高钾血症和低血糖症各一次。未发生严重不良事件。确定了患者体验的四个总体主题:用于适应的策略、对规范的破坏、个人偏好和对可接受性的影响。结论:LED是可接受和安全的,自我报告的依从性高。未来的LED试验应包括专业的糖尿病管理、高钾血症的密切监测以及足够的支持,以帮助管理副作用以及饮食和社会调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability, Adherence, Safety and Experiences of Low Energy Diets in People With Obesity and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Mixed Methods Study

Objectives

Obesity is a modifiable risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Low energy diets (LEDs) have not been adequately studied in people with CKD. This study aimed to explore acceptability, adherence, safety, and experiences of two LED prescriptions in adults living with obesity and CKD.

Design and Methods

In a mixed-methods study, obese adults with CKD were prescribed two LEDs (∼800 to 1000 kcal/day each), in a randomised order for 2 weeks each. One diet consisted of four meal replacement products daily (Optifast®, Nestlé Health Science) and the other two pre-prepared frozen meals (Lite n’ Easy®, Mitchell's Quality Foods). Participants received weekly dietitian support, completed daily adherence checklists (converted to % of provided meals/replacements consumed) and participated in post-intervention semi-structured interviews to capture their experience.

Results

Nine participants were included (mean age 46.5 ± 14.3 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 64 ± 26 mL/min/1.73 m2, 4/9 male). Mean self-reported adherence was 88 ± 11% and mean 4-week weight change was −7.3 ± 5.6 kg. Two participants withdrew at week two. Most frequently reported side effects were hunger and headaches. Adverse events of interest included one episode each of hyperkalaemia and hypoglycaemia. No serious adverse events occurred. Four overarching themes of patient experiences were identified: strategies used to adapt, disruption to the norm, individual preferences, and influences on acceptability.

Conclusions

LEDs were found to be acceptable and safe with high self-reported adherence rates. Future LED trials should include specialist diabetes management, close monitoring for hyperkalaemia and adequate support to assist with managing side effects and dietary and social adjustments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Journal of Renal Nutrition 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Nutrition is devoted exclusively to renal nutrition science and renal dietetics. Its content is appropriate for nutritionists, physicians and researchers working in nephrology. Each issue contains a state-of-the-art review, original research, articles on the clinical management and education of patients, a current literature review, and nutritional analysis of food products that have clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信