早期糖尿病眼损伤:使用诊断能力的检测方法比较。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Bhim B. Rai PhD , Joshua P. van Kleef PhD , Faran Sabeti PhD , Robin Vlieger PhD , Hanna Suominen PhD , Ted Maddess PhD
{"title":"早期糖尿病眼损伤:使用诊断能力的检测方法比较。","authors":"Bhim B. Rai PhD ,&nbsp;Joshua P. van Kleef PhD ,&nbsp;Faran Sabeti PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Vlieger PhD ,&nbsp;Hanna Suominen PhD ,&nbsp;Ted Maddess PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is now clear that retinal neuropathy precedes classical microvascular retinopathy in diabetes. Therefore, tests that underpin useful new endpoints must provide high diagnostic power well before the onset of moderate diabetic retinopathy. Hence, we compare detection methods of early diabetic eye damage. We reviewed data from a range of functional and structural studies of early diabetic eye disease and computed standardized effect size as a measure of diagnostic power, allowing the studies to be compared quantitatively. We then derived minimum performance criteria for tests to provide useful clinical endpoints. This included the criteria that tests should be rapid and easy so that children with type 1 diabetes can be followed into adulthood with the same tests. We also defined attributes that lend test data to further improve performance using Machine/Deep Learning. Data from a new form of objective perimetry suggested that the criteria are achievable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625723001145/pdfft?md5=3419c8eaf727102585ca7ee0c9a51f1f&pid=1-s2.0-S0039625723001145-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early diabetic eye damage: Comparing detection methods using diagnostic power\",\"authors\":\"Bhim B. Rai PhD ,&nbsp;Joshua P. van Kleef PhD ,&nbsp;Faran Sabeti PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Vlieger PhD ,&nbsp;Hanna Suominen PhD ,&nbsp;Ted Maddess PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is now clear that retinal neuropathy precedes classical microvascular retinopathy in diabetes. Therefore, tests that underpin useful new endpoints must provide high diagnostic power well before the onset of moderate diabetic retinopathy. Hence, we compare detection methods of early diabetic eye damage. We reviewed data from a range of functional and structural studies of early diabetic eye disease and computed standardized effect size as a measure of diagnostic power, allowing the studies to be compared quantitatively. We then derived minimum performance criteria for tests to provide useful clinical endpoints. This included the criteria that tests should be rapid and easy so that children with type 1 diabetes can be followed into adulthood with the same tests. We also defined attributes that lend test data to further improve performance using Machine/Deep Learning. Data from a new form of objective perimetry suggested that the criteria are achievable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625723001145/pdfft?md5=3419c8eaf727102585ca7ee0c9a51f1f&pid=1-s2.0-S0039625723001145-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625723001145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625723001145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现在很清楚,糖尿病患者的视网膜神经病变先于典型的微血管视网膜病变。因此,支持有用的新终点的测试必须在中度糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)发作之前提供高诊断能力。因此,我们比较了早期糖尿病眼损伤的检测方法。我们回顾了早期糖尿病眼病的一系列功能和结构研究的数据,并计算了标准化效应大小作为诊断能力的衡量标准,使这些研究能够进行定量比较。然后,我们得出了测试的最低性能标准,以提供有用的临床终点。这包括测试应该快速简单的标准,这样患有1型糖尿病的儿童就可以通过同样的测试进入成年。我们还定义了提供测试数据的属性,以使用机器/深度学习进一步提高性能。来自一种新形式的客观视野测量的数据表明,这些标准是可以实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early diabetic eye damage: Comparing detection methods using diagnostic power

It is now clear that retinal neuropathy precedes classical microvascular retinopathy in diabetes. Therefore, tests that underpin useful new endpoints must provide high diagnostic power well before the onset of moderate diabetic retinopathy. Hence, we compare detection methods of early diabetic eye damage. We reviewed data from a range of functional and structural studies of early diabetic eye disease and computed standardized effect size as a measure of diagnostic power, allowing the studies to be compared quantitatively. We then derived minimum performance criteria for tests to provide useful clinical endpoints. This included the criteria that tests should be rapid and easy so that children with type 1 diabetes can be followed into adulthood with the same tests. We also defined attributes that lend test data to further improve performance using Machine/Deep Learning. Data from a new form of objective perimetry suggested that the criteria are achievable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信