临床医生对截肢后疼痛评估和康复干预的看法。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Tonya L Rich, Kierra J Falbo, Hannah Phelan, Amy Gravely, Erin E Krebs, Jacob A Finn, Mary Matsumoto, Katherine Muschler, Christine M Olney, Jessica Kiecker, Andrew H Hansen
{"title":"临床医生对截肢后疼痛评估和康复干预的看法。","authors":"Tonya L Rich, Kierra J Falbo, Hannah Phelan, Amy Gravely, Erin E Krebs, Jacob A Finn, Mary Matsumoto, Katherine Muschler, Christine M Olney, Jessica Kiecker, Andrew H Hansen","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician perspectives on postamputation pain assessment and rehabilitation interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Tonya L Rich, Kierra J Falbo, Hannah Phelan, Amy Gravely, Erin E Krebs, Jacob A Finn, Mary Matsumoto, Katherine Muschler, Christine M Olney, Jessica Kiecker, Andrew H Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是探讨退伍军人事务部(VA)截肢临床医生对截肢相关疼痛的测量和治疗的自我报告观点和临床实践。研究设计:对弗吉尼亚州医疗保健系统内73名弗吉尼亚州康复临床医生进行横断面调查。结果:受访者最常见的临床背景包括物理治疗师(36%)、假肢医生(32%)以及物理医学和康复专家(21%)。41名临床医生(56%)报告使用疼痛结果测量,偏好平均疼痛强度数字评分量表(通用)(97%)、平均体模肢体疼痛强度数字评级量表(80%)或患者报告结果测量信息系统疼痛干扰(12%)测量。临床医生最常推荐的干预措施是紧身衣、脱敏和物理治疗。临床医生认为心态、认知和动机是促进患者对治疗反应的因素。相反,临床医生认为依从性差、对干预措施缺乏信心以及对传统疼痛干预措施(如药物)的偏好是改善的常见障碍。我们询问了分级运动图像的常用处理方法。尽管分级运动成像最初分为三个阶段(肢体偏侧、外显运动成像、镜像治疗),但临床医生报告主要使用外显运动图像和镜像治疗。结果:大多数使用标准化疼痛测量的临床医生更喜欢强度评级。临床医生根据患者的表现选择疼痛干预措施。这项工作有助于了解影响临床医生选择非药物干预治疗的因素。包括定性组成部分的未来工作可以进一步识别截肢疼痛康复干预措施的实施障碍,以提高实践的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician perspectives on postamputation pain assessment and rehabilitation interventions.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain.

Study design: Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System.

Results: The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy.

Results: Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信