巴布亚新几内亚新爱尔兰省新冠肺炎免疫计划成功的障碍。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-21 DOI:10.22605/RRH7883
Belinda Flanagan, Kay Nevill, Camilla Sabok, Mimi Zilliacus, Jonathon Sward
{"title":"巴布亚新几内亚新爱尔兰省新冠肺炎免疫计划成功的障碍。","authors":"Belinda Flanagan,&nbsp;Kay Nevill,&nbsp;Camilla Sabok,&nbsp;Mimi Zilliacus,&nbsp;Jonathon Sward","doi":"10.22605/RRH7883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although guidance exists for the public health activities recommended for the management of COVID-19 in Papua New Guinea (PNG), community vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major challenge. Vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children, people living in rural and remote communities, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions are disproportionally affected by COVID-19. This project aimed to address the reasons for community vaccine hesitancy in New Ireland Province, PNG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate within the community, a mixed-methods approach was used in conjunction with two methods of data collection. First, a survey was provided to community members. The survey was adapted from two pre-existing validated survey instruments, the Oxford COVID-19 Hesitancy Scale and the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale. Community leaders and healthcare workers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to provide a more detailed response of their experience of vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 participants from New Ireland Province were surveyed. Although vaccine awareness among the cohort was high (86.7%), overall uptake of vaccination was low (7.2%). Despite this, only 27.6% of participants indicated they would receive the vaccine should it be made available to them. Participants had concerns regarding vaccine safety, vaccine advice, and the authenticity and origins of the COVID-19 virus itself. Religious and political influence compounded the mistrust community members had for vaccine recommendations. Some community members stated their community had suffered for many years with serious illness, expressing a fatalistic acceptance of the virus, as they do other illnesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a significant problem that has the potential to negatively affect population-level health. An urgent focused effort to strengthen immunisation programs in PNG is evident. Preventative primary health care is a national priority; however, for the successful delivery of vaccination initiatives, well-formed immunisation programs that include education that will dispel myths and misinformation are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to the success of COVID-19 immunisation programs in New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea.\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Flanagan,&nbsp;Kay Nevill,&nbsp;Camilla Sabok,&nbsp;Mimi Zilliacus,&nbsp;Jonathon Sward\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH7883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although guidance exists for the public health activities recommended for the management of COVID-19 in Papua New Guinea (PNG), community vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major challenge. Vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children, people living in rural and remote communities, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions are disproportionally affected by COVID-19. This project aimed to address the reasons for community vaccine hesitancy in New Ireland Province, PNG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate within the community, a mixed-methods approach was used in conjunction with two methods of data collection. First, a survey was provided to community members. The survey was adapted from two pre-existing validated survey instruments, the Oxford COVID-19 Hesitancy Scale and the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale. Community leaders and healthcare workers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to provide a more detailed response of their experience of vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 participants from New Ireland Province were surveyed. Although vaccine awareness among the cohort was high (86.7%), overall uptake of vaccination was low (7.2%). Despite this, only 27.6% of participants indicated they would receive the vaccine should it be made available to them. Participants had concerns regarding vaccine safety, vaccine advice, and the authenticity and origins of the COVID-19 virus itself. Religious and political influence compounded the mistrust community members had for vaccine recommendations. Some community members stated their community had suffered for many years with serious illness, expressing a fatalistic acceptance of the virus, as they do other illnesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a significant problem that has the potential to negatively affect population-level health. An urgent focused effort to strengthen immunisation programs in PNG is evident. Preventative primary health care is a national priority; however, for the successful delivery of vaccination initiatives, well-formed immunisation programs that include education that will dispel myths and misinformation are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7883\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:尽管巴布亚新几内亚(PNG)对新冠肺炎管理建议的公共卫生活动有指导意见,但社区疫苗犹豫已被确定为一个重大挑战。弱势群体,如老年人、儿童、生活在农村和偏远社区的人、社会经济弱势群体和已有某些疾病的人,受到新冠肺炎的影响不成比例。该项目旨在解决巴布亚新几内亚新爱尔兰省社区疫苗犹豫的原因。方法:为了了解疫苗犹豫的理由和社区内接种疫苗的意图,将混合方法与两种数据收集方法结合使用。首先,向社区成员提供了一项调查。该调查改编自两种预先存在的经验证的调查工具,即牛津新冠肺炎犹豫量表和牛津新冠肺炎疫苗信心和自满量表。社区领导人和医护人员被邀请参加半结构化访谈,以更详细地回答他们接受疫苗的经历。结果:共有181名来自新爱尔兰省的参与者接受了调查。尽管队列中的疫苗意识很高(86.7%),但总体疫苗接种率很低(7.2%)。尽管如此,只有27.6%的参与者表示,如果疫苗向他们提供,他们会接种疫苗。与会者对疫苗安全性、疫苗建议以及新冠肺炎病毒本身的真实性和起源表示担忧。宗教和政治影响加剧了社区成员对疫苗建议的不信任。一些社区成员表示,他们的社区多年来一直患有严重疾病,与其他疾病一样,表达了对病毒的宿命论接受。结论:疫苗犹豫是一个重大问题,有可能对人群健康产生负面影响。巴布亚新几内亚加强免疫接种计划的紧迫努力显而易见。预防性初级保健是国家的优先事项;然而,为了成功实施疫苗接种计划,需要完善的免疫接种计划,包括消除神话和错误信息的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to the success of COVID-19 immunisation programs in New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea.

Introduction: Although guidance exists for the public health activities recommended for the management of COVID-19 in Papua New Guinea (PNG), community vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major challenge. Vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children, people living in rural and remote communities, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions are disproportionally affected by COVID-19. This project aimed to address the reasons for community vaccine hesitancy in New Ireland Province, PNG.

Methods: To understand the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate within the community, a mixed-methods approach was used in conjunction with two methods of data collection. First, a survey was provided to community members. The survey was adapted from two pre-existing validated survey instruments, the Oxford COVID-19 Hesitancy Scale and the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale. Community leaders and healthcare workers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to provide a more detailed response of their experience of vaccine acceptance.

Results: A total of 181 participants from New Ireland Province were surveyed. Although vaccine awareness among the cohort was high (86.7%), overall uptake of vaccination was low (7.2%). Despite this, only 27.6% of participants indicated they would receive the vaccine should it be made available to them. Participants had concerns regarding vaccine safety, vaccine advice, and the authenticity and origins of the COVID-19 virus itself. Religious and political influence compounded the mistrust community members had for vaccine recommendations. Some community members stated their community had suffered for many years with serious illness, expressing a fatalistic acceptance of the virus, as they do other illnesses.

Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy is a significant problem that has the potential to negatively affect population-level health. An urgent focused effort to strengthen immunisation programs in PNG is evident. Preventative primary health care is a national priority; however, for the successful delivery of vaccination initiatives, well-formed immunisation programs that include education that will dispel myths and misinformation are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信