日本老年人生活满意度轨迹的队列差异。

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1037/pag0000778
Takeshi Nakagawa, Erika Kobayashi
{"title":"日本老年人生活满意度轨迹的队列差异。","authors":"Takeshi Nakagawa, Erika Kobayashi","doi":"10.1037/pag0000778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individual development and aging are shaped by historical changes in sociocultural contexts. Studies indicate that later-born cohorts experience improvements in well-being in the young-old. However, whether this historical trend holds in the old-old remains unknown. Using longitudinal data of Japanese older adults, we examined birth cohort differences in trajectories of well-being as measured by life satisfaction. Data were derived from a nationally representative study conducted from 1987 to 2012. We compared earlier- and later-born cohorts over 10 years in two age groups: the young-old (<i>n</i> = 1,195 per cohort; age 63-74; years of birth: 1913-1924 and 1925-1936) and the old-old (<i>n</i> = 436 per cohort; age 75-86; years of birth: 1901-1912 and 1913-1924). To control for covariates, we used case-matched cohorts based on age and sex. Growth curve models were employed to estimate age-related changes in life satisfaction by age group. At age 75 years, life satisfaction was higher in the later-born cohort than in the earlier-born cohort across age groups. Cohort differences in the rate of change in life satisfaction were absent among the young-old. Among the old-old, the later-born cohort showed steeper declines than the earlier-born cohort. Socioeconomic, social, and health resources did not fully explain the cohort differences in both age groups. Our results suggest that historical improvements in well-being in the young-old do not persist into the old-old. Societal advancements may enable later-born cohorts to survive with limited resources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"601-614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohort differences in trajectories of life satisfaction among Japanese older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Nakagawa, Erika Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pag0000778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individual development and aging are shaped by historical changes in sociocultural contexts. Studies indicate that later-born cohorts experience improvements in well-being in the young-old. However, whether this historical trend holds in the old-old remains unknown. Using longitudinal data of Japanese older adults, we examined birth cohort differences in trajectories of well-being as measured by life satisfaction. Data were derived from a nationally representative study conducted from 1987 to 2012. We compared earlier- and later-born cohorts over 10 years in two age groups: the young-old (<i>n</i> = 1,195 per cohort; age 63-74; years of birth: 1913-1924 and 1925-1936) and the old-old (<i>n</i> = 436 per cohort; age 75-86; years of birth: 1901-1912 and 1913-1924). To control for covariates, we used case-matched cohorts based on age and sex. Growth curve models were employed to estimate age-related changes in life satisfaction by age group. At age 75 years, life satisfaction was higher in the later-born cohort than in the earlier-born cohort across age groups. Cohort differences in the rate of change in life satisfaction were absent among the young-old. Among the old-old, the later-born cohort showed steeper declines than the earlier-born cohort. Socioeconomic, social, and health resources did not fully explain the cohort differences in both age groups. Our results suggest that historical improvements in well-being in the young-old do not persist into the old-old. Societal advancements may enable later-born cohorts to survive with limited resources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"601-614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000778\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000778","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个体发展和老龄化是由社会文化背景下的历史变化所决定的。研究表明,晚生群体在年轻人和老年人的幸福感方面有所改善。然而,这一历史趋势是否能在老年人中持续下去仍然是个未知数。利用日本老年人的纵向数据,我们研究了以生活满意度衡量的幸福轨迹的出生队列差异。数据来源于1987年至2012年进行的一项具有全国代表性的研究。我们比较了两个年龄组中10岁以上出生较早和较晚的队列:年轻人-老年人(每个队列n=1195;年龄63-74;出生年份:1913-1924和1925-1936)和老年人(每队列n=436;年龄75-86;出生年龄:1901-1912和1913-1924)。为了控制协变量,我们使用了基于年龄和性别的病例匹配队列。使用生长曲线模型来估计各年龄组的生活满意度随年龄的变化。75岁时,各年龄组晚生队列的生活满意度高于早生队列。在年轻人和老年人之间,生活满意度变化率的队列差异不存在。在老年人中,晚生群体的下降幅度比早生群体更大。社会经济、社会和卫生资源并不能完全解释两个年龄组的队列差异。我们的研究结果表明,年轻人和老年人幸福感的历史改善不会持续到老年人。社会进步可能使晚生群体能够在有限的资源下生存。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cohort differences in trajectories of life satisfaction among Japanese older adults.

Individual development and aging are shaped by historical changes in sociocultural contexts. Studies indicate that later-born cohorts experience improvements in well-being in the young-old. However, whether this historical trend holds in the old-old remains unknown. Using longitudinal data of Japanese older adults, we examined birth cohort differences in trajectories of well-being as measured by life satisfaction. Data were derived from a nationally representative study conducted from 1987 to 2012. We compared earlier- and later-born cohorts over 10 years in two age groups: the young-old (n = 1,195 per cohort; age 63-74; years of birth: 1913-1924 and 1925-1936) and the old-old (n = 436 per cohort; age 75-86; years of birth: 1901-1912 and 1913-1924). To control for covariates, we used case-matched cohorts based on age and sex. Growth curve models were employed to estimate age-related changes in life satisfaction by age group. At age 75 years, life satisfaction was higher in the later-born cohort than in the earlier-born cohort across age groups. Cohort differences in the rate of change in life satisfaction were absent among the young-old. Among the old-old, the later-born cohort showed steeper declines than the earlier-born cohort. Socioeconomic, social, and health resources did not fully explain the cohort differences in both age groups. Our results suggest that historical improvements in well-being in the young-old do not persist into the old-old. Societal advancements may enable later-born cohorts to survive with limited resources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信