1990年至2023年间现有研究的范围审查:衡量跨学科的虚拟实践社区。

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David T. Lardier Jr., Elizabeth L. Dickson, Janna M. Hackett, Carolina S. Verdezoto
{"title":"1990年至2023年间现有研究的范围审查:衡量跨学科的虚拟实践社区。","authors":"David T. Lardier Jr.,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Dickson,&nbsp;Janna M. Hackett,&nbsp;Carolina S. Verdezoto","doi":"10.1002/jcop.23092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) can decrease social, structural, and professional isolation, provide opportunities for knowledge-sharing abilities, and may improve participants' self-reported sense of connectedness to one another and their profession. However, more research is needed to examine measurement of VCoPs effectiveness on participants. In this scoping review our research question was: <i>What is the state of the science for VCoPs and how are these communities measured in current research specific to education and health/health education?</i> Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five stages for conducting a rigorous scoping review, we identified gaps in the evidence regarding the overall state of the science on measurement of VCoPs inclusive of quantitative and mixed-methods literature describing validated VCoP measurement in both English or Spanish from January 1990 to July 2023, and within the health, education, or health education disciplines. Initial searches yielded 2350 articles. Authors independently screened papers and extracted data. The results of this scoping review (<i>N</i> = 13 articles) highlight the measurement of VCoPs specific to education, healthcare, health education research. We found that measures had been tested in VCoPs within health, education, health education, and professional education information technologies disciplines, with the Community of Inquiry framework being the most common theoretical foundation. The findings provide an understanding of measurement tools and impacts and outcomes of VCoP participation and we make recommendations for future VCoP measurement tool development.</p>","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":"52 1","pages":"198-225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of existing research between 1990 and 2023: Measuring virtual communities of practice across disciplines\",\"authors\":\"David T. Lardier Jr.,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Dickson,&nbsp;Janna M. Hackett,&nbsp;Carolina S. Verdezoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcop.23092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) can decrease social, structural, and professional isolation, provide opportunities for knowledge-sharing abilities, and may improve participants' self-reported sense of connectedness to one another and their profession. However, more research is needed to examine measurement of VCoPs effectiveness on participants. In this scoping review our research question was: <i>What is the state of the science for VCoPs and how are these communities measured in current research specific to education and health/health education?</i> Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five stages for conducting a rigorous scoping review, we identified gaps in the evidence regarding the overall state of the science on measurement of VCoPs inclusive of quantitative and mixed-methods literature describing validated VCoP measurement in both English or Spanish from January 1990 to July 2023, and within the health, education, or health education disciplines. Initial searches yielded 2350 articles. Authors independently screened papers and extracted data. The results of this scoping review (<i>N</i> = 13 articles) highlight the measurement of VCoPs specific to education, healthcare, health education research. We found that measures had been tested in VCoPs within health, education, health education, and professional education information technologies disciplines, with the Community of Inquiry framework being the most common theoretical foundation. The findings provide an understanding of measurement tools and impacts and outcomes of VCoP participation and we make recommendations for future VCoP measurement tool development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of community psychology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"198-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of community psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.23092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.23092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚拟实践社区(VCoPs)可以减少社会、结构和职业孤立,提供知识共享能力的机会,并可以提高参与者自我报告的彼此和职业的联系感。然而,还需要更多的研究来检验VCoP对参与者有效性的衡量。在这篇范围界定综述中,我们的研究问题是:VCoP的科学状况如何?在当前针对教育和健康/健康教育的研究中,如何衡量这些社区?在Arksey和O'Malley进行严格范围界定审查的五个阶段的指导下,我们发现了关于VCoP测量科学整体状况的证据中的差距,包括描述1990年1月至2023年7月期间用英语或西班牙语进行的经验证的VCoP测量的定量和混合方法文献,或健康教育学科。初步搜索得到2350篇文章。作者独立筛选论文并提取数据。范围界定审查的结果(N = 13篇文章)强调了针对教育、医疗保健和健康教育研究的VCoP的测量。我们发现,在健康、教育、健康教育和专业教育信息技术学科的VCoP中测试了这些措施,调查社区框架是最常见的理论基础。研究结果提供了对测量工具以及VCoP参与的影响和结果的理解,我们为未来VCoP测量工具的开发提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review of existing research between 1990 and 2023: Measuring virtual communities of practice across disciplines

Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) can decrease social, structural, and professional isolation, provide opportunities for knowledge-sharing abilities, and may improve participants' self-reported sense of connectedness to one another and their profession. However, more research is needed to examine measurement of VCoPs effectiveness on participants. In this scoping review our research question was: What is the state of the science for VCoPs and how are these communities measured in current research specific to education and health/health education? Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five stages for conducting a rigorous scoping review, we identified gaps in the evidence regarding the overall state of the science on measurement of VCoPs inclusive of quantitative and mixed-methods literature describing validated VCoP measurement in both English or Spanish from January 1990 to July 2023, and within the health, education, or health education disciplines. Initial searches yielded 2350 articles. Authors independently screened papers and extracted data. The results of this scoping review (N = 13 articles) highlight the measurement of VCoPs specific to education, healthcare, health education research. We found that measures had been tested in VCoPs within health, education, health education, and professional education information technologies disciplines, with the Community of Inquiry framework being the most common theoretical foundation. The findings provide an understanding of measurement tools and impacts and outcomes of VCoP participation and we make recommendations for future VCoP measurement tool development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信