依那普利与曲安奈德病灶内注射治疗瘢痕疙瘩的安全性和有效性。

IF 0.6 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Basma Hamada Mohamed, Samar Eltahlawy, Walaa Ahmed Marzouk, Noha E Mohamad
{"title":"依那普利与曲安奈德病灶内注射治疗瘢痕疙瘩的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Basma Hamada Mohamed,&nbsp;Samar Eltahlawy,&nbsp;Walaa Ahmed Marzouk,&nbsp;Noha E Mohamad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Keloids are pathologic conditions characterized by fibroblast hyper-proliferation and excess collagen deposition. Enalapril, one of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, has recently been highlighted as a new therapeutic modality in treating keloids. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) in keloids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with multiple keloids were enrolled in our study. Enalapril and TAA were injected intralesionally in one session per month for three sessions. The clinical outcomes were assessed via the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, according to VSS and POSAS, there was a high statistically significant difference (p-value ≤ 0.01) before treatment, at the end of each session, and 3 months after treatment. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding degree of improvement. Patients treated with TAA developed more significant complications than those in the enalapril group (p-value < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both enalapril and TAA had the same clinical effect. Enalapril could be a safe alternative to steroids in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Further studies on enalapril are needed on a large sample of patients with further focus on the mechanism of this innovative drug.</p>","PeriodicalId":45914,"journal":{"name":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","volume":"32 3","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids.\",\"authors\":\"Basma Hamada Mohamed,&nbsp;Samar Eltahlawy,&nbsp;Walaa Ahmed Marzouk,&nbsp;Noha E Mohamad\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Keloids are pathologic conditions characterized by fibroblast hyper-proliferation and excess collagen deposition. Enalapril, one of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, has recently been highlighted as a new therapeutic modality in treating keloids. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) in keloids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with multiple keloids were enrolled in our study. Enalapril and TAA were injected intralesionally in one session per month for three sessions. The clinical outcomes were assessed via the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, according to VSS and POSAS, there was a high statistically significant difference (p-value ≤ 0.01) before treatment, at the end of each session, and 3 months after treatment. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding degree of improvement. Patients treated with TAA developed more significant complications than those in the enalapril group (p-value < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both enalapril and TAA had the same clinical effect. Enalapril could be a safe alternative to steroids in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Further studies on enalapril are needed on a large sample of patients with further focus on the mechanism of this innovative drug.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"77-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:瘢痕疙瘩是以成纤维细胞过度增殖和胶原过度沉积为特征的病理性疾病。依那普利是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂之一,最近被强调为治疗瘢痕疙瘩的一种新的治疗方式。本研究评估了病灶内注射依那普利与曲安奈德(TAA)治疗瘢痕疙瘩的有效性。方法:对40例多发性瘢痕疙瘩患者进行研究。依那普利和TAA每月一次病灶内注射,共三次。通过温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)和患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)评估临床结果。结果:在两组中,根据VSS和POSAS,在治疗前、每次疗程结束时和治疗后3个月,差异具有统计学意义(p值≤0.01)。在改善程度方面,两组之间没有显著差异。与依那普利组相比,接受TAA治疗的患者出现了更显著的并发症(p值<0.05)。结论:依那普利和TAA具有相同的临床疗效。依那普利可能是治疗瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕的一种安全的类固醇替代品。需要对大量患者进行依那普利的进一步研究,并进一步关注这种创新药物的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids.

Introduction: Keloids are pathologic conditions characterized by fibroblast hyper-proliferation and excess collagen deposition. Enalapril, one of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, has recently been highlighted as a new therapeutic modality in treating keloids. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) in keloids.

Methods: Forty patients with multiple keloids were enrolled in our study. Enalapril and TAA were injected intralesionally in one session per month for three sessions. The clinical outcomes were assessed via the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

Results: In both groups, according to VSS and POSAS, there was a high statistically significant difference (p-value ≤ 0.01) before treatment, at the end of each session, and 3 months after treatment. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding degree of improvement. Patients treated with TAA developed more significant complications than those in the enalapril group (p-value < 0.05).

Conclusions: Both enalapril and TAA had the same clinical effect. Enalapril could be a safe alternative to steroids in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Further studies on enalapril are needed on a large sample of patients with further focus on the mechanism of this innovative drug.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信