药剂师发起的标准化“测试索赔”工作流程对获得出院抗菌药物的预期障碍的影响。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1177/87551225231196047
Surafel G Mulugeta, Nancy C MacDonald, Caren J El-Khoury, Susan L Davis, Rachel M Kenney
{"title":"药剂师发起的标准化“测试索赔”工作流程对获得出院抗菌药物的预期障碍的影响。","authors":"Surafel G Mulugeta, Nancy C MacDonald, Caren J El-Khoury, Susan L Davis, Rachel M Kenney","doi":"10.1177/87551225231196047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Inability to access and afford discharge oral antimicrobials may delay discharges or result in therapeutic failure. \"Test-claims\" have the potential to identify such barriers. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated discharge antimicrobial access and patient outcomes after implementation of a standardized, inpatient pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial discharge medication cost inquiry (aDMCI) process. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, pilot retrospective cohort study that included adults admitted for ≥72 hours from November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019, and discharged on oral antimicrobials. Patients with a cost inquiry (aDMCI group) were compared with those without (standard-of-care, SOC, group). Primary endpoint was discharge delay. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients discharged on suboptimal antimicrobials and medication errors from aDMCI. <b>Results:</b> 84 patients were included: 43 in SOC and 41 in aDMCI. Seventy-five antimicrobial cost inquiries were evaluated among 41 patients. There were no discharge delays or medication errors associated with the standardized \"test-claim\" (aDMCI) workflow. Patients in the SOC group had a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (4 [2-6] vs 2 [1-4], <i>P =</i>0.004), were more likely to be immunosuppressed (24, 56% vs 12, 29%; <i>P =</i>0.014), and had longer hospitalization (8 [5-15] vs 6 [5-9] days, <i>P =</i>0.026). Primary access barriers were prior-authorization (8, 11%) and associated with linezolid and moxifloxacin cost inquiries. Most aDMCIs results were available in <24 hours (66, 88%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The aDMCI process is safe and offers an actionable transition of care tool that can identify barriers to accessing discharge medications while insulating patients from surprise out-of-pocket cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Standardized, Pharmacist-Initiated \\\"Test-Claim\\\" Workflow for Anticipating Barriers to Accessing Discharge Antimicrobials.\",\"authors\":\"Surafel G Mulugeta, Nancy C MacDonald, Caren J El-Khoury, Susan L Davis, Rachel M Kenney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225231196047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Inability to access and afford discharge oral antimicrobials may delay discharges or result in therapeutic failure. \\\"Test-claims\\\" have the potential to identify such barriers. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated discharge antimicrobial access and patient outcomes after implementation of a standardized, inpatient pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial discharge medication cost inquiry (aDMCI) process. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, pilot retrospective cohort study that included adults admitted for ≥72 hours from November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019, and discharged on oral antimicrobials. Patients with a cost inquiry (aDMCI group) were compared with those without (standard-of-care, SOC, group). Primary endpoint was discharge delay. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients discharged on suboptimal antimicrobials and medication errors from aDMCI. <b>Results:</b> 84 patients were included: 43 in SOC and 41 in aDMCI. Seventy-five antimicrobial cost inquiries were evaluated among 41 patients. There were no discharge delays or medication errors associated with the standardized \\\"test-claim\\\" (aDMCI) workflow. Patients in the SOC group had a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (4 [2-6] vs 2 [1-4], <i>P =</i>0.004), were more likely to be immunosuppressed (24, 56% vs 12, 29%; <i>P =</i>0.014), and had longer hospitalization (8 [5-15] vs 6 [5-9] days, <i>P =</i>0.026). Primary access barriers were prior-authorization (8, 11%) and associated with linezolid and moxifloxacin cost inquiries. Most aDMCIs results were available in <24 hours (66, 88%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The aDMCI process is safe and offers an actionable transition of care tool that can identify barriers to accessing discharge medications while insulating patients from surprise out-of-pocket cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231196047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231196047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无法获得和提供出院口服抗菌药物可能会延迟出院或导致治疗失败。“测试声明”有可能识别此类障碍。目的:本研究评估了实施标准化、住院药剂师发起的抗菌出院药物成本调查(aDMCI)流程后的出院抗菌药物使用情况和患者结果。方法:这是一项机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的试点回顾性队列研究,包括2018年11月1日至2019年2月28日入院≥72小时并服用口服抗菌药物出院的成年人。将进行成本调查的患者(aDMCI组)与未进行成本调查(标准护理、SOC组)进行比较。主要终点是出院延迟。次要终点包括使用次优抗菌药物出院的患者百分比和aDMCI的用药错误。结果:84例患者包括:SOC 43例,aDMCI 41例。在41名患者中评估了75项抗菌药物成本调查。没有与标准化“测试索赔”(aDMCI)工作流程相关的出院延迟或用药错误。SOC组患者的Charlson合并症指数更高(4[2-6]vs 2[1-4],P=0.004),更容易受到免疫抑制(2456%vs 1229%;P=0.014),住院时间更长(8[5-15]vs 6[5-9]天,P=0.026)。主要的进入障碍是事先授权(8.11%),并与利奈唑胺和莫西沙星的费用查询有关。结论中提供了大多数aDMCI结果:aDMCI过程是安全的,并提供了一种可操作的护理过渡工具,可以识别获得出院药物的障碍,同时使患者免受意外的自付费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a Standardized, Pharmacist-Initiated "Test-Claim" Workflow for Anticipating Barriers to Accessing Discharge Antimicrobials.

Background: Inability to access and afford discharge oral antimicrobials may delay discharges or result in therapeutic failure. "Test-claims" have the potential to identify such barriers. Objective: This study evaluated discharge antimicrobial access and patient outcomes after implementation of a standardized, inpatient pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial discharge medication cost inquiry (aDMCI) process. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, pilot retrospective cohort study that included adults admitted for ≥72 hours from November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019, and discharged on oral antimicrobials. Patients with a cost inquiry (aDMCI group) were compared with those without (standard-of-care, SOC, group). Primary endpoint was discharge delay. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients discharged on suboptimal antimicrobials and medication errors from aDMCI. Results: 84 patients were included: 43 in SOC and 41 in aDMCI. Seventy-five antimicrobial cost inquiries were evaluated among 41 patients. There were no discharge delays or medication errors associated with the standardized "test-claim" (aDMCI) workflow. Patients in the SOC group had a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (4 [2-6] vs 2 [1-4], P =0.004), were more likely to be immunosuppressed (24, 56% vs 12, 29%; P =0.014), and had longer hospitalization (8 [5-15] vs 6 [5-9] days, P =0.026). Primary access barriers were prior-authorization (8, 11%) and associated with linezolid and moxifloxacin cost inquiries. Most aDMCIs results were available in <24 hours (66, 88%). Conclusions: The aDMCI process is safe and offers an actionable transition of care tool that can identify barriers to accessing discharge medications while insulating patients from surprise out-of-pocket cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信