乳房重建中浅静脉系统对DIEP皮瓣引流的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2181-7034
Esther Mihwa Oh Choi, Renan Diego Américo Ribeiro, Eduardo Montag, Thiago Ueda, Alberto Yoshikazu Okada, Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz, Fabio de Freitas Busnardo, Rolf Gemperli
{"title":"乳房重建中浅静脉系统对DIEP皮瓣引流的影响。","authors":"Esther Mihwa Oh Choi, Renan Diego Américo Ribeiro, Eduardo Montag, Thiago Ueda, Alberto Yoshikazu Okada, Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz, Fabio de Freitas Busnardo, Rolf Gemperli","doi":"10.1055/a-2181-7034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Autologous tissue has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The use of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has the advantages of giving a natural appearance to the reconstructed breast and being associated with lower morbidity at the donor site when compared with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Venous complications such as venous thrombosis and insufficiency remain the main causes of flap loss and surgical revisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of superficial venous drainage of the DIEP flap and the addition of a second venous anastomosis have on flap survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a retrospective cohort study collected from a prospective database maintained by our institution. Data was obtained from the medical records of female patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap between March 2010 and March 2017. We evaluated 137 DIEP patients with unilateral breast reconstructions. In 64 (46.7%) the deep venous system was chosen and 73 (53.3%) had an additional superficial vein anastomosed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Out of the 137 patients evaluated, there were 16 (11.67%) cases of revision, 14 (10.21%) were due to venous thrombosis. Twelve cases (8.75%) of flap loss were reported. Reoperation rate was lower in the dual venous drainage group when compared with the single venous drainage group (<i>p</i> = 0.005), as was the rate of flap loss (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and reoperation due to venous thrombosis (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Out of the 125 DIEP flaps, fat necrosis was clinically identified in 7 (5.1%) cases, and the rate was lower in the dual venous drainage system group (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Dual venous drainage of a DIEP flap appears to reduce the rates of venous thrombosis, reoperation, total flap loss, and fat necrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of the Superficial Venous System on DIEP Flap Drainage in Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Esther Mihwa Oh Choi, Renan Diego Américo Ribeiro, Eduardo Montag, Thiago Ueda, Alberto Yoshikazu Okada, Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz, Fabio de Freitas Busnardo, Rolf Gemperli\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2181-7034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Autologous tissue has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The use of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has the advantages of giving a natural appearance to the reconstructed breast and being associated with lower morbidity at the donor site when compared with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Venous complications such as venous thrombosis and insufficiency remain the main causes of flap loss and surgical revisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of superficial venous drainage of the DIEP flap and the addition of a second venous anastomosis have on flap survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a retrospective cohort study collected from a prospective database maintained by our institution. Data was obtained from the medical records of female patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap between March 2010 and March 2017. We evaluated 137 DIEP patients with unilateral breast reconstructions. In 64 (46.7%) the deep venous system was chosen and 73 (53.3%) had an additional superficial vein anastomosed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Out of the 137 patients evaluated, there were 16 (11.67%) cases of revision, 14 (10.21%) were due to venous thrombosis. Twelve cases (8.75%) of flap loss were reported. Reoperation rate was lower in the dual venous drainage group when compared with the single venous drainage group (<i>p</i> = 0.005), as was the rate of flap loss (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and reoperation due to venous thrombosis (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Out of the 125 DIEP flaps, fat necrosis was clinically identified in 7 (5.1%) cases, and the rate was lower in the dual venous drainage system group (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Dual venous drainage of a DIEP flap appears to reduce the rates of venous thrombosis, reoperation, total flap loss, and fat necrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-7034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-7034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自体组织已成为乳房重建的金标准。DIEP皮瓣的使用具有使重建的乳房呈现自然外观的优点,并且与腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)相比,在供体部位的发病率较低。静脉并发症,如静脉血栓形成和功能不全,仍然是皮瓣丢失和手术翻修的主要原因。本研究的目的是评估DIEP皮瓣的浅静脉引流和增加第二静脉吻合对皮瓣存活的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,收集自我们机构维护的前瞻性数据库。数据来自2010年3月至2017年3月期间接受乳房切除术和DIEP皮瓣乳房重建的女性患者的医疗记录。我们评估了137例DIEP患者的单侧乳房重建。64例(46.7%)选择了深静脉系统,73例(53.3%)选择了额外的浅静脉吻合。结果:在评估的137名患者中,有16例(11.67%)翻修,14例(10.21%)是由于静脉血栓形成。皮瓣丢失12例(8.75%)。与单静脉引流组相比,双静脉引流组的再手术率较低(p=0.005),皮瓣丢失率(p=0.006)和因静脉血栓再次手术率(p=0.002)也较低,结论:DIEP皮瓣双静脉引流可降低静脉血栓形成率、再次手术率、皮瓣总面积减少率和脂肪坏死率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of the Superficial Venous System on DIEP Flap Drainage in Breast Reconstruction.

Background:  Autologous tissue has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The use of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has the advantages of giving a natural appearance to the reconstructed breast and being associated with lower morbidity at the donor site when compared with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Venous complications such as venous thrombosis and insufficiency remain the main causes of flap loss and surgical revisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of superficial venous drainage of the DIEP flap and the addition of a second venous anastomosis have on flap survival.

Methods:  This was a retrospective cohort study collected from a prospective database maintained by our institution. Data was obtained from the medical records of female patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap between March 2010 and March 2017. We evaluated 137 DIEP patients with unilateral breast reconstructions. In 64 (46.7%) the deep venous system was chosen and 73 (53.3%) had an additional superficial vein anastomosed.

Results:  Out of the 137 patients evaluated, there were 16 (11.67%) cases of revision, 14 (10.21%) were due to venous thrombosis. Twelve cases (8.75%) of flap loss were reported. Reoperation rate was lower in the dual venous drainage group when compared with the single venous drainage group (p = 0.005), as was the rate of flap loss (p = 0.006) and reoperation due to venous thrombosis (p = 0.002). Out of the 125 DIEP flaps, fat necrosis was clinically identified in 7 (5.1%) cases, and the rate was lower in the dual venous drainage system group (p = 0.01).

Conclusion:  Dual venous drainage of a DIEP flap appears to reduce the rates of venous thrombosis, reoperation, total flap loss, and fat necrosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信