加强纳米技术风险治理标准化工作的路线图。

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kirsten Rasmussen , Eric A.J. Bleeker , James Baker , Jacques Bouillard , Wouter Fransman , Thomas A.J. Kuhlbusch , Susanne Resch , Jacques-Aurélien Sergent , Lya G. Soeteman-Hernandez , Blanca Suarez-Merino , Andrea Porcari
{"title":"加强纳米技术风险治理标准化工作的路线图。","authors":"Kirsten Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Eric A.J. Bleeker ,&nbsp;James Baker ,&nbsp;Jacques Bouillard ,&nbsp;Wouter Fransman ,&nbsp;Thomas A.J. Kuhlbusch ,&nbsp;Susanne Resch ,&nbsp;Jacques-Aurélien Sergent ,&nbsp;Lya G. Soeteman-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Blanca Suarez-Merino ,&nbsp;Andrea Porcari","doi":"10.1016/j.impact.2023.100483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A roadmap was developed to strengthen standardisation activities for risk governance of nanotechnology. Its baseline is the available standardised and harmonised methods for nanotechnology developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In order to identify improvements and needs for new themes in standardisation work, an analysis of the state-of-the-art concepts and interpretations of risk governance of nanotechnology was performed. Eleven overall areas of action were identified, each including a subset of specific topics. Themes addressed include physical chemical characterisation, assessment of hazard, exposure, risk and socio-economic factors, as well as education &amp; training and social dialogue. This has been visualised in a standardisation roadmap spanning a timeframe of ten years and including key outcomes and highlights of the analysis. Furthermore, the roadmap indicates potential areas of action for harmonisation and standardisation (H&amp;S) for nanomaterials and nanotechnology. It also includes an evaluation of the current level (limited, moderate, intense) of ongoing H&amp;S activities and indicates the time horizon for the different areas of action. As the identified areas differ in their state of development, the number and type of actions varied widely amongst the different actions towards achieving standardisation. Thus, priority areas were also identified. The overall objective of these actions is to strengthen risk governance towards a safe use of nanomaterials and nano-related products. Though not explicitly addressed, risk-based legislation and policies are supported via the proposed H&amp;S actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18786,"journal":{"name":"NanoImpact","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100483"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A roadmap to strengthen standardisation efforts in risk governance of nanotechnology\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Eric A.J. Bleeker ,&nbsp;James Baker ,&nbsp;Jacques Bouillard ,&nbsp;Wouter Fransman ,&nbsp;Thomas A.J. Kuhlbusch ,&nbsp;Susanne Resch ,&nbsp;Jacques-Aurélien Sergent ,&nbsp;Lya G. Soeteman-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Blanca Suarez-Merino ,&nbsp;Andrea Porcari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.impact.2023.100483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A roadmap was developed to strengthen standardisation activities for risk governance of nanotechnology. Its baseline is the available standardised and harmonised methods for nanotechnology developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In order to identify improvements and needs for new themes in standardisation work, an analysis of the state-of-the-art concepts and interpretations of risk governance of nanotechnology was performed. Eleven overall areas of action were identified, each including a subset of specific topics. Themes addressed include physical chemical characterisation, assessment of hazard, exposure, risk and socio-economic factors, as well as education &amp; training and social dialogue. This has been visualised in a standardisation roadmap spanning a timeframe of ten years and including key outcomes and highlights of the analysis. Furthermore, the roadmap indicates potential areas of action for harmonisation and standardisation (H&amp;S) for nanomaterials and nanotechnology. It also includes an evaluation of the current level (limited, moderate, intense) of ongoing H&amp;S activities and indicates the time horizon for the different areas of action. As the identified areas differ in their state of development, the number and type of actions varied widely amongst the different actions towards achieving standardisation. Thus, priority areas were also identified. The overall objective of these actions is to strengthen risk governance towards a safe use of nanomaterials and nano-related products. Though not explicitly addressed, risk-based legislation and policies are supported via the proposed H&amp;S actions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NanoImpact\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NanoImpact\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452074823000344\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NanoImpact","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452074823000344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制定了一个路线图,以加强纳米技术风险治理的标准化活动。其基线是由国际标准化组织(ISO)、欧洲标准化委员会(CEN)和经济合作与发展组织(OECD)开发的可用的纳米技术标准化和协调方法。为了确定标准化工作中新主题的改进和需求,对纳米技术风险治理的最新概念和解释进行了分析。确定了11个总体行动领域,每个领域都包括一个子集的具体专题。所讨论的主题包括物理化学特征、危害、暴露、风险和社会经济因素的评估,以及教育和培训以及社会对话。这已经在一个跨越十年时间框架的标准化路线图中可视化,包括分析的关键结果和亮点。此外,该路线图指出了纳米材料和纳米技术协调和标准化(H&S)的潜在行动领域。它还包括对正在进行的健康与安全活动的当前水平(有限、中等、强烈)的评估,并指出了不同行动领域的时间范围。由于确定的领域在发展状态上有所不同,实现标准化的不同行动的数量和类型差异很大。因此,还确定了优先领域。这些行动的总体目标是加强风险治理,以安全使用纳米材料和纳米相关产品。虽然没有明确解决,但基于风险的立法和政策通过拟议的健康和安全行动得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A roadmap to strengthen standardisation efforts in risk governance of nanotechnology

A roadmap to strengthen standardisation efforts in risk governance of nanotechnology

A roadmap was developed to strengthen standardisation activities for risk governance of nanotechnology. Its baseline is the available standardised and harmonised methods for nanotechnology developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In order to identify improvements and needs for new themes in standardisation work, an analysis of the state-of-the-art concepts and interpretations of risk governance of nanotechnology was performed. Eleven overall areas of action were identified, each including a subset of specific topics. Themes addressed include physical chemical characterisation, assessment of hazard, exposure, risk and socio-economic factors, as well as education & training and social dialogue. This has been visualised in a standardisation roadmap spanning a timeframe of ten years and including key outcomes and highlights of the analysis. Furthermore, the roadmap indicates potential areas of action for harmonisation and standardisation (H&S) for nanomaterials and nanotechnology. It also includes an evaluation of the current level (limited, moderate, intense) of ongoing H&S activities and indicates the time horizon for the different areas of action. As the identified areas differ in their state of development, the number and type of actions varied widely amongst the different actions towards achieving standardisation. Thus, priority areas were also identified. The overall objective of these actions is to strengthen risk governance towards a safe use of nanomaterials and nano-related products. Though not explicitly addressed, risk-based legislation and policies are supported via the proposed H&S actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NanoImpact
NanoImpact Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: NanoImpact is a multidisciplinary journal that focuses on nanosafety research and areas related to the impacts of manufactured nanomaterials on human and environmental systems and the behavior of nanomaterials in these systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信