Áine M Lennon, Nina Sophie Reich, Gerlinde Ferstl, Helga Ebensberger, Karl-Anton Hiller, Wolfgang Buchalla
{"title":"在体外选择性去除红色荧光龋性牙本质后放置的粘合剂的剪切结合强度。","authors":"Áine M Lennon, Nina Sophie Reich, Gerlinde Ferstl, Helga Ebensberger, Karl-Anton Hiller, Wolfgang Buchalla","doi":"10.1159/000534349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Red-fluorescing dentine indicates bacterial contamination [Caries Res 2002; 36: 315-319]. We investigated effect of removal of red fluorescent dentine caries on shear bond strength and fracture mode of 4 adhesive approaches. Sixty-five carious teeth and 50 noncarious controls were distributed into 4 groups: Clearfil™ self-etch (CSE), OptiBond™ FL total etch (OTE), Scotchbond™ Universal total etch (STE) and self-etch (SSE). Samples were excited at 405 nm and viewed through 530 nm filter. Carious samples were ground flat exposing strongly red-fluorescing (StrongRF) dentine, on which a composite cylinder was placed, using one of 4 adhesives. After 22 h in water, shear bond strength and fracture mode were analysed. StrongRF was removed; composite cylinders were placed on weakly red-fluorescing (WeakRF) dentine and tested as described above. Finally, red-fluorescing dentine was removed, and composite cylinders were placed on non-fluorescing (NonRF) dentine and tested. Composites were placed at 3 corresponding heights in controls. After 22 h in water, shear bond strength testing and fracture mode analysis were performed. Differences were tested using Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon tests (p ≤0.05). Median (Q1, Q3) shear bond strength on StrongRF was SSE 14.4 (9.2, 18.2) MPa >CSE 10.2 (6.4, 17.3) MPa >STE 9.1 (6.9, 11.2) MPa >OTE 6.8 (4.0, 10.8) MPa. Shear bond strength increased statistically significantly for all adhesives on WeakRF: SSE 19.8 (13.6, 24.3) MPa >STE 19.5 (12.7, 23.1) MPa >CSE 17.5 (12.0, 22.5) MPa >OTE 15.8 (11.9, 20.9) MPa. Only STE 25.6 (22.4, 29.1) MPa and CSE 22.1 (17.6, 24.6) MPa were significantly different on NonRF compared to WeakRF. For controls tested at corresponding depths, superficial shear bond strength was OTE 18.7 (16.0, 22.1) MPa >STE 18.4 (12.0, 25.9) MPa >CSE 18.1 (12.7, 20.7) MPa >SSE 13.0 (9.6, 17.8) MPa. This was significantly higher compared to StrongRF except for SSE. Central shear bond strength was not significantly different to WeakRF, deep shear bond strength was significantly lower for SSE and CSE but higher for OTE compared to carious. Conclusion: StrongRF dentine should be removed for higher shear bond strength, but WeakRF dentine can often be preserved without compromising adhesive bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"17-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10885838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear Bond Strength of Adhesives Placed following Selective Removal of Red-Fluorescing Carious Dentine in vitro.\",\"authors\":\"Áine M Lennon, Nina Sophie Reich, Gerlinde Ferstl, Helga Ebensberger, Karl-Anton Hiller, Wolfgang Buchalla\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Red-fluorescing dentine indicates bacterial contamination [Caries Res 2002; 36: 315-319]. We investigated effect of removal of red fluorescent dentine caries on shear bond strength and fracture mode of 4 adhesive approaches. Sixty-five carious teeth and 50 noncarious controls were distributed into 4 groups: Clearfil™ self-etch (CSE), OptiBond™ FL total etch (OTE), Scotchbond™ Universal total etch (STE) and self-etch (SSE). Samples were excited at 405 nm and viewed through 530 nm filter. Carious samples were ground flat exposing strongly red-fluorescing (StrongRF) dentine, on which a composite cylinder was placed, using one of 4 adhesives. After 22 h in water, shear bond strength and fracture mode were analysed. StrongRF was removed; composite cylinders were placed on weakly red-fluorescing (WeakRF) dentine and tested as described above. Finally, red-fluorescing dentine was removed, and composite cylinders were placed on non-fluorescing (NonRF) dentine and tested. Composites were placed at 3 corresponding heights in controls. After 22 h in water, shear bond strength testing and fracture mode analysis were performed. Differences were tested using Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon tests (p ≤0.05). Median (Q1, Q3) shear bond strength on StrongRF was SSE 14.4 (9.2, 18.2) MPa >CSE 10.2 (6.4, 17.3) MPa >STE 9.1 (6.9, 11.2) MPa >OTE 6.8 (4.0, 10.8) MPa. Shear bond strength increased statistically significantly for all adhesives on WeakRF: SSE 19.8 (13.6, 24.3) MPa >STE 19.5 (12.7, 23.1) MPa >CSE 17.5 (12.0, 22.5) MPa >OTE 15.8 (11.9, 20.9) MPa. Only STE 25.6 (22.4, 29.1) MPa and CSE 22.1 (17.6, 24.6) MPa were significantly different on NonRF compared to WeakRF. For controls tested at corresponding depths, superficial shear bond strength was OTE 18.7 (16.0, 22.1) MPa >STE 18.4 (12.0, 25.9) MPa >CSE 18.1 (12.7, 20.7) MPa >SSE 13.0 (9.6, 17.8) MPa. This was significantly higher compared to StrongRF except for SSE. Central shear bond strength was not significantly different to WeakRF, deep shear bond strength was significantly lower for SSE and CSE but higher for OTE compared to carious. Conclusion: StrongRF dentine should be removed for higher shear bond strength, but WeakRF dentine can often be preserved without compromising adhesive bond strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10885838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534349\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shear Bond Strength of Adhesives Placed following Selective Removal of Red-Fluorescing Carious Dentine in vitro.
Red-fluorescing dentine indicates bacterial contamination [Caries Res 2002; 36: 315-319]. We investigated effect of removal of red fluorescent dentine caries on shear bond strength and fracture mode of 4 adhesive approaches. Sixty-five carious teeth and 50 noncarious controls were distributed into 4 groups: Clearfil™ self-etch (CSE), OptiBond™ FL total etch (OTE), Scotchbond™ Universal total etch (STE) and self-etch (SSE). Samples were excited at 405 nm and viewed through 530 nm filter. Carious samples were ground flat exposing strongly red-fluorescing (StrongRF) dentine, on which a composite cylinder was placed, using one of 4 adhesives. After 22 h in water, shear bond strength and fracture mode were analysed. StrongRF was removed; composite cylinders were placed on weakly red-fluorescing (WeakRF) dentine and tested as described above. Finally, red-fluorescing dentine was removed, and composite cylinders were placed on non-fluorescing (NonRF) dentine and tested. Composites were placed at 3 corresponding heights in controls. After 22 h in water, shear bond strength testing and fracture mode analysis were performed. Differences were tested using Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon tests (p ≤0.05). Median (Q1, Q3) shear bond strength on StrongRF was SSE 14.4 (9.2, 18.2) MPa >CSE 10.2 (6.4, 17.3) MPa >STE 9.1 (6.9, 11.2) MPa >OTE 6.8 (4.0, 10.8) MPa. Shear bond strength increased statistically significantly for all adhesives on WeakRF: SSE 19.8 (13.6, 24.3) MPa >STE 19.5 (12.7, 23.1) MPa >CSE 17.5 (12.0, 22.5) MPa >OTE 15.8 (11.9, 20.9) MPa. Only STE 25.6 (22.4, 29.1) MPa and CSE 22.1 (17.6, 24.6) MPa were significantly different on NonRF compared to WeakRF. For controls tested at corresponding depths, superficial shear bond strength was OTE 18.7 (16.0, 22.1) MPa >STE 18.4 (12.0, 25.9) MPa >CSE 18.1 (12.7, 20.7) MPa >SSE 13.0 (9.6, 17.8) MPa. This was significantly higher compared to StrongRF except for SSE. Central shear bond strength was not significantly different to WeakRF, deep shear bond strength was significantly lower for SSE and CSE but higher for OTE compared to carious. Conclusion: StrongRF dentine should be removed for higher shear bond strength, but WeakRF dentine can often be preserved without compromising adhesive bond strength.
期刊介绍：
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
