Benjamin N Wadström, Anders B Wulff, Kasper M Pedersen, Børge G Nordestgaard
{"title":"富含甘油三酯的脂蛋白与ASCVD风险中的低密度脂蛋白相等吗?","authors":"Benjamin N Wadström, Anders B Wulff, Kasper M Pedersen, Børge G Nordestgaard","doi":"10.1007/s11883-023-01153-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recent large clinical trials have failed to show that triglyceride-rich lipoprotein-lowering therapies decrease the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this review, we reconcile these findings with evidence showing that elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and the cholesterol they contain, remnant cholesterol, cause ASCVD alongside low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Results from observational epidemiology, genetic epidemiology, and randomized controlled trials indicate that lowering of remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterol decrease ASCVD risk by a similar magnitude per 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) lower non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (remnant cholesterol+LDL cholesterol). Indeed, recent guidelines for ASCVD prevention recommend the use of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol instead of LDL cholesterol. Current consensus is moving towards recognizing remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterols as equals per 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) higher levels in the risk assessment of ASCVD; hence, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein-lowering therapies should also lower levels of non-HDL cholesterol to reduce ASCVD risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":" ","pages":"795-803"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins Equal Low-Density Lipoproteins in Risk of ASCVD?\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin N Wadström, Anders B Wulff, Kasper M Pedersen, Børge G Nordestgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11883-023-01153-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recent large clinical trials have failed to show that triglyceride-rich lipoprotein-lowering therapies decrease the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this review, we reconcile these findings with evidence showing that elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and the cholesterol they contain, remnant cholesterol, cause ASCVD alongside low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Results from observational epidemiology, genetic epidemiology, and randomized controlled trials indicate that lowering of remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterol decrease ASCVD risk by a similar magnitude per 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) lower non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (remnant cholesterol+LDL cholesterol). Indeed, recent guidelines for ASCVD prevention recommend the use of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol instead of LDL cholesterol. Current consensus is moving towards recognizing remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterols as equals per 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) higher levels in the risk assessment of ASCVD; hence, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein-lowering therapies should also lower levels of non-HDL cholesterol to reduce ASCVD risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Atherosclerosis Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"795-803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Atherosclerosis Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01153-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01153-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins Equal Low-Density Lipoproteins in Risk of ASCVD?
Purpose of review: Recent large clinical trials have failed to show that triglyceride-rich lipoprotein-lowering therapies decrease the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this review, we reconcile these findings with evidence showing that elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and the cholesterol they contain, remnant cholesterol, cause ASCVD alongside low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.
Recent findings: Results from observational epidemiology, genetic epidemiology, and randomized controlled trials indicate that lowering of remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterol decrease ASCVD risk by a similar magnitude per 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) lower non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (remnant cholesterol+LDL cholesterol). Indeed, recent guidelines for ASCVD prevention recommend the use of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol instead of LDL cholesterol. Current consensus is moving towards recognizing remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterols as equals per 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) higher levels in the risk assessment of ASCVD; hence, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein-lowering therapies should also lower levels of non-HDL cholesterol to reduce ASCVD risk.
期刊介绍:
The aim of this journal is to systematically provide expert views on current basic science and clinical advances in the field of atherosclerosis and highlight the most important developments likely to transform the field of cardiovascular prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
We accomplish this aim by appointing major authorities to serve as Section Editors who select leading experts from around the world to provide definitive reviews on key topics and papers published in the past year. We also provide supplementary reviews and commentaries from well-known figures in the field. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.