有护理需求的老年非正规护理人员的脆弱性:多维脆弱性的意义。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859
Eveline Raemdonck, Ellen Gorus, Nico De Witte
{"title":"有护理需求的老年非正规护理人员的脆弱性:多维脆弱性的意义。","authors":"Eveline Raemdonck, Ellen Gorus, Nico De Witte","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve our understanding of older informal caregivers' (ICs) health, this paper aimed to compare multidimensional frailty and sociodemographic and economic characteristics between (subgroups of) older ICs and non-caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data originating from the Belgian Ageing studies (<i>n</i> = 6054), intergroup differences between older ICs and non-caregivers and between care-dependent and -independent older ICs/non-caregivers were conducted. In addition binary logistic regressions were carried out to determine which variables were related to caregiver status and need of assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all respondents, 14.3% were ICs reporting care needs themselves. Informal and non-caregivers with care needs, relative to those without, more often only (partially) completed primary education, were significantly older, more likely to be female and widowed, found it more difficult to make ends meet, and reported higher levels of frailty in each domain. Moreover, environmental and psychological frailty were associated with an increase in the likelihood of reporting need of assistance among older non-caregivers and ICs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a particular vulnerable subpopulation of older ICs with care needs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>It is essential for clinicians to be observant for unrecognized frailty and care needs in older ICs and to develop targeted intervention and prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"976-987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Vulnerability of Older Informal Caregivers with Care Needs: Significance of Multidimensional Frailty.\",\"authors\":\"Eveline Raemdonck, Ellen Gorus, Nico De Witte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve our understanding of older informal caregivers' (ICs) health, this paper aimed to compare multidimensional frailty and sociodemographic and economic characteristics between (subgroups of) older ICs and non-caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data originating from the Belgian Ageing studies (<i>n</i> = 6054), intergroup differences between older ICs and non-caregivers and between care-dependent and -independent older ICs/non-caregivers were conducted. In addition binary logistic regressions were carried out to determine which variables were related to caregiver status and need of assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all respondents, 14.3% were ICs reporting care needs themselves. Informal and non-caregivers with care needs, relative to those without, more often only (partially) completed primary education, were significantly older, more likely to be female and widowed, found it more difficult to make ends meet, and reported higher levels of frailty in each domain. Moreover, environmental and psychological frailty were associated with an increase in the likelihood of reporting need of assistance among older non-caregivers and ICs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a particular vulnerable subpopulation of older ICs with care needs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>It is essential for clinicians to be observant for unrecognized frailty and care needs in older ICs and to develop targeted intervention and prevention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"976-987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了提高我们对老年非正规照顾者健康状况的理解,本文旨在比较老年非正规护理者(亚组)和非照顾者之间的多维脆弱性以及社会人口和经济特征 = 6054),对老年ICs和非护理人员之间以及依赖护理和独立护理的老年ICs/非护理人员的组间差异进行了研究。此外,还进行了二元逻辑回归,以确定哪些变量与照顾者状态和援助需求有关。结果:在所有受访者中,14.3%的ICU报告自己有护理需求。有护理需求的非正规和非护理人员,与那些没有(通常只(部分)完成小学教育的人相比,年龄要大得多,更有可能是女性和寡居,发现入不敷出更困难,并且报告说每个领域的虚弱程度都更高。此外,环境和心理脆弱分别与老年非护理人员和重症监护室报告需要援助的可能性增加有关。结论:本研究揭示了有护理需求的老年重症监护室中一个特殊的弱势亚群。临床意义:临床医生必须注意老年重症监护室未被识别的虚弱和护理需求,并制定有针对性的干预和预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Vulnerability of Older Informal Caregivers with Care Needs: Significance of Multidimensional Frailty.

Objectives: To improve our understanding of older informal caregivers' (ICs) health, this paper aimed to compare multidimensional frailty and sociodemographic and economic characteristics between (subgroups of) older ICs and non-caregivers.

Methods: Using data originating from the Belgian Ageing studies (n = 6054), intergroup differences between older ICs and non-caregivers and between care-dependent and -independent older ICs/non-caregivers were conducted. In addition binary logistic regressions were carried out to determine which variables were related to caregiver status and need of assistance.

Results: Among all respondents, 14.3% were ICs reporting care needs themselves. Informal and non-caregivers with care needs, relative to those without, more often only (partially) completed primary education, were significantly older, more likely to be female and widowed, found it more difficult to make ends meet, and reported higher levels of frailty in each domain. Moreover, environmental and psychological frailty were associated with an increase in the likelihood of reporting need of assistance among older non-caregivers and ICs, respectively.

Conclusions: This study revealed a particular vulnerable subpopulation of older ICs with care needs.

Clinical implications: It is essential for clinicians to be observant for unrecognized frailty and care needs in older ICs and to develop targeted intervention and prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信