他汀类药物的使用与冠状动脉钙化:观察性研究和随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s11883-023-01151-w
Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Soroush Mohammadi Jouabadi, Daniel Bos, Bruno H Stricker, Fariba Ahmadizar
{"title":"他汀类药物的使用与冠状动脉钙化:观察性研究和随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Soroush Mohammadi Jouabadi, Daniel Bos, Bruno H Stricker, Fariba Ahmadizar","doi":"10.1007/s11883-023-01151-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aimed to determine the association between statin use and coronary artery calcification (CAC), as detected by computed tomography in the general population, in previously published observational studies (OSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search until February 2022 identified 41 relevant studies, comprising 29 OSs and 12 RCTs. We employed six meta-analysis models, stratifying studies based on design and effect metrics. For cohort studies, the pooled β of the association with CAC quantified by the Agatston score was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.05; 0.16), with an average follow-up time per person (AFTP) of 3.68 years. Cross-sectional studies indicated a pooled odds ratio of 2.11 (95% CI = 1.61; 2.78) for the presence of CAC. In RCTs, the pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for CAC, quantified by Agatston score or volume, over and AFTP of 1.25 years were not statistically significant (SMD =  - 0.06, 95% CI =  - 0.19; 0.06 and SMD = 0.26, 95% CI =  - 0.66; 1.19), but significantly different (p-value = 0.04). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses did not show any significant differences in pooled estimates across covariates. The effect of statins on CAC differs across study designs. OSs demonstrate associations between statin use and higher CAC scores and presence while being prone to confounding by indication. Effects from RCTs do not reach statistical significance and vary depending on the quantification method, hampering drawing conclusions. Further investigations are required to address the limitations inherent in each approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":" ","pages":"769-784"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statin Use and Coronary Artery Calcification: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mitra Nekouei Shahraki, Soroush Mohammadi Jouabadi, Daniel Bos, Bruno H Stricker, Fariba Ahmadizar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11883-023-01151-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aimed to determine the association between statin use and coronary artery calcification (CAC), as detected by computed tomography in the general population, in previously published observational studies (OSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search until February 2022 identified 41 relevant studies, comprising 29 OSs and 12 RCTs. We employed six meta-analysis models, stratifying studies based on design and effect metrics. For cohort studies, the pooled β of the association with CAC quantified by the Agatston score was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.05; 0.16), with an average follow-up time per person (AFTP) of 3.68 years. Cross-sectional studies indicated a pooled odds ratio of 2.11 (95% CI = 1.61; 2.78) for the presence of CAC. In RCTs, the pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for CAC, quantified by Agatston score or volume, over and AFTP of 1.25 years were not statistically significant (SMD =  - 0.06, 95% CI =  - 0.19; 0.06 and SMD = 0.26, 95% CI =  - 0.66; 1.19), but significantly different (p-value = 0.04). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses did not show any significant differences in pooled estimates across covariates. The effect of statins on CAC differs across study designs. OSs demonstrate associations between statin use and higher CAC scores and presence while being prone to confounding by indication. Effects from RCTs do not reach statistical significance and vary depending on the quantification method, hampering drawing conclusions. Further investigations are required to address the limitations inherent in each approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Atherosclerosis Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"769-784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Atherosclerosis Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01151-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01151-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本综述旨在确定他汀类药物的使用与冠状动脉钙化(CAC)之间的关系,如在先前发表的观察性研究(OS)和随机对照试验(RCT)中通过计算机断层扫描在普通人群中检测到的。最新发现:截至2022年2月的系统搜索确定了41项相关研究,包括29个OS和12个RCT。我们采用了六个荟萃分析模型,根据设计和效果指标对研究进行分层。对于队列研究,通过Agaston评分量化的与CAC相关性的合并β为0.11(95%置信区间 = 0.05;0.16),平均每人随访时间(AFTP)为3.68年。横断面研究表明,合并优势比为2.11(95%置信区间 = 1.61;2.78)。在随机对照试验中,通过Agaston评分或体积量化的CAC合并标准化平均差(SMD)在1.25年内和AFTP没有统计学意义(SMD =  - 0.06,95%CI =  - 0.19;0.06和SMD = 0.26,95%CI =  - 0.66;1.19),但显著不同(p值 = 0.04)。荟萃回归和亚组分析没有显示出协变量之间的汇总估计值有任何显著差异。他汀类药物对CAC的影响因研究设计而异。OS表明他汀类药物的使用与较高的CAC评分和存在之间存在关联,同时容易因适应症而混淆。随机对照试验的效果没有达到统计学显著性,并且因量化方法而异,阻碍了得出结论。需要进一步调查,以解决每种方法固有的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statin Use and Coronary Artery Calcification: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Purpose of review: This review aimed to determine the association between statin use and coronary artery calcification (CAC), as detected by computed tomography in the general population, in previously published observational studies (OSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Recent findings: A systematic search until February 2022 identified 41 relevant studies, comprising 29 OSs and 12 RCTs. We employed six meta-analysis models, stratifying studies based on design and effect metrics. For cohort studies, the pooled β of the association with CAC quantified by the Agatston score was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.05; 0.16), with an average follow-up time per person (AFTP) of 3.68 years. Cross-sectional studies indicated a pooled odds ratio of 2.11 (95% CI = 1.61; 2.78) for the presence of CAC. In RCTs, the pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for CAC, quantified by Agatston score or volume, over and AFTP of 1.25 years were not statistically significant (SMD =  - 0.06, 95% CI =  - 0.19; 0.06 and SMD = 0.26, 95% CI =  - 0.66; 1.19), but significantly different (p-value = 0.04). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses did not show any significant differences in pooled estimates across covariates. The effect of statins on CAC differs across study designs. OSs demonstrate associations between statin use and higher CAC scores and presence while being prone to confounding by indication. Effects from RCTs do not reach statistical significance and vary depending on the quantification method, hampering drawing conclusions. Further investigations are required to address the limitations inherent in each approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to systematically provide expert views on current basic science and clinical advances in the field of atherosclerosis and highlight the most important developments likely to transform the field of cardiovascular prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. We accomplish this aim by appointing major authorities to serve as Section Editors who select leading experts from around the world to provide definitive reviews on key topics and papers published in the past year. We also provide supplementary reviews and commentaries from well-known figures in the field. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信