右主动脉弓和第一支夹角在胎儿超声心动图检测双主动脉弓中的应用。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1159/000534039
Masayoshi Mori, Yoichiro Ishii, Kunihiko Takahashi, Yuka Hayashida, Takuya Fujisaki, Kumiyo Matsuo, Dai Asada, Hisaaki Aoki, Futoshi Kayatani
{"title":"右主动脉弓和第一支夹角在胎儿超声心动图检测双主动脉弓中的应用。","authors":"Masayoshi Mori, Yoichiro Ishii, Kunihiko Takahashi, Yuka Hayashida, Takuya Fujisaki, Kumiyo Matsuo, Dai Asada, Hisaaki Aoki, Futoshi Kayatani","doi":"10.1159/000534039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The presence of a double aortic arch (DAA) is manifested by compressive symptoms, requiring surgery. DAA cases are classified as either complete or incomplete type. DAA and a right aortic arch with mirror image branching (mRAA) have a similar configuration to the first branch artery. The first branch of the mRAA is the left brachiocephalic artery, which appears to be the same as that of an incomplete DAA due to blood flow interruption. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the differences between DAA and mRAA by fetal echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA at our facility between 2010 and 2022. The patients were diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA after birth and remaining fetal echocardiograms. The patients were divided into the DAA (complete DAA: n = 4, incomplete DAA: n = 3) and mRAA (n = 4) groups. The following three outcomes were compared: (1) angle between the right aortic arch and first branch (RF angle), (2) ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta, and (3) maximum tracheal diameter on a three-vessel trachea view.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incomplete DAA cases were difficult to diagnose via fetal echocardiography. On fetal echocardiography, the RF angle was significantly steeper in the DAA group than in the mRAA group (median 57° [36°-69°] vs. 75° [62°-94°]; p &lt; 0.05). The DAA and RAA groups showed no significant differences in the ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta (median 0.57 [0.17-0.68] vs. 0.73 [0.56-1.0]) and maximum tracheal diameter (median 2.5 [1.4-3.3] vs. 3.2 [2.8-3.5] mm). The cut-off value for the presence of DAA was an RF angle &lt;71°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DAA group (complete and incomplete DAA) had a significantly steeper RF angle than the mRAA group. Therefore, RF angle measurement could improve the fetal diagnosis and postnatal prognosis of DAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of the Angle between the Right Aortic Arch and First Branch for Detecting Double Aortic Arch via Fetal Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Masayoshi Mori, Yoichiro Ishii, Kunihiko Takahashi, Yuka Hayashida, Takuya Fujisaki, Kumiyo Matsuo, Dai Asada, Hisaaki Aoki, Futoshi Kayatani\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The presence of a double aortic arch (DAA) is manifested by compressive symptoms, requiring surgery. DAA cases are classified as either complete or incomplete type. DAA and a right aortic arch with mirror image branching (mRAA) have a similar configuration to the first branch artery. The first branch of the mRAA is the left brachiocephalic artery, which appears to be the same as that of an incomplete DAA due to blood flow interruption. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the differences between DAA and mRAA by fetal echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA at our facility between 2010 and 2022. The patients were diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA after birth and remaining fetal echocardiograms. The patients were divided into the DAA (complete DAA: n = 4, incomplete DAA: n = 3) and mRAA (n = 4) groups. The following three outcomes were compared: (1) angle between the right aortic arch and first branch (RF angle), (2) ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta, and (3) maximum tracheal diameter on a three-vessel trachea view.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incomplete DAA cases were difficult to diagnose via fetal echocardiography. On fetal echocardiography, the RF angle was significantly steeper in the DAA group than in the mRAA group (median 57° [36°-69°] vs. 75° [62°-94°]; p &lt; 0.05). The DAA and RAA groups showed no significant differences in the ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta (median 0.57 [0.17-0.68] vs. 0.73 [0.56-1.0]) and maximum tracheal diameter (median 2.5 [1.4-3.3] vs. 3.2 [2.8-3.5] mm). The cut-off value for the presence of DAA was an RF angle &lt;71°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DAA group (complete and incomplete DAA) had a significantly steeper RF angle than the mRAA group. Therefore, RF angle measurement could improve the fetal diagnosis and postnatal prognosis of DAA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836748/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:双主动脉弓(DAA)表现为压迫症状,需要手术治疗。DAA病例分为完全型或不完全型。DAA和具有镜像分支的右主动脉弓(mRAA)具有与第一分支动脉相似的构造。mRAA的第一支是左头臂动脉,由于血流中断,它似乎与不完全DAA的动脉相同。本回顾性研究旨在通过胎儿超声心动图评估DAA和mRAA之间的差异。方法:这项单一回顾性队列研究包括2010年至2022年间在我们机构诊断为完全性DAA、不完全性DAA.或mRAA的所有患者。患者出生后被诊断为完全DAA、不完全DAA或mRAA,以及剩余的胎儿超声心动图。患者被分为DAA(完全DAA:n=4,不完全DAA:3)和mRAA(n=4)组。比较了以下三种结果:(1)右主动脉弓和第一支之间的角度(RF角),(2)主动脉弓、主动脉弓第一支和降主动脉界定的区域的高宽比,以及(3)三血管气管视图中的最大气管直径。结果:不完全DAA的胎儿超声心动图诊断困难。在胎儿超声心动图上,DAA组的RF角明显陡于mRAA组(中位数57°[36°-69°]vs.75°[62°-94°];P<0.05)。DAA和RAA组在主动脉弓、主动脉弓第一支、,降主动脉(中位数0.57[0.17-0.68]对0.73[0.56-1.0])和最大气管直径(中位数2.5[1.4-3.3]对3.2[2.8-3.5]mm)。DAA存在的截止值为RF角度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of the Angle between the Right Aortic Arch and First Branch for Detecting Double Aortic Arch via Fetal Echocardiography.

Introduction: The presence of a double aortic arch (DAA) is manifested by compressive symptoms, requiring surgery. DAA cases are classified as either complete or incomplete type. DAA and a right aortic arch with mirror image branching (mRAA) have a similar configuration to the first branch artery. The first branch of the mRAA is the left brachiocephalic artery, which appears to be the same as that of an incomplete DAA due to blood flow interruption. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the differences between DAA and mRAA by fetal echocardiography.

Methods: This single retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA at our facility between 2010 and 2022. The patients were diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA after birth and remaining fetal echocardiograms. The patients were divided into the DAA (complete DAA: n = 4, incomplete DAA: n = 3) and mRAA (n = 4) groups. The following three outcomes were compared: (1) angle between the right aortic arch and first branch (RF angle), (2) ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta, and (3) maximum tracheal diameter on a three-vessel trachea view.

Results: The incomplete DAA cases were difficult to diagnose via fetal echocardiography. On fetal echocardiography, the RF angle was significantly steeper in the DAA group than in the mRAA group (median 57° [36°-69°] vs. 75° [62°-94°]; p < 0.05). The DAA and RAA groups showed no significant differences in the ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta (median 0.57 [0.17-0.68] vs. 0.73 [0.56-1.0]) and maximum tracheal diameter (median 2.5 [1.4-3.3] vs. 3.2 [2.8-3.5] mm). The cut-off value for the presence of DAA was an RF angle <71°.

Conclusion: The DAA group (complete and incomplete DAA) had a significantly steeper RF angle than the mRAA group. Therefore, RF angle measurement could improve the fetal diagnosis and postnatal prognosis of DAA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信