急性视网膜中央动脉和分支动脉闭塞的验光实践模式。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1097/WNO.0000000000001915
Kelsey M Mileski, Valérie Biousse, Nancy J Newman, Alexis M Flowers, Wesley Chan, Michael Dattilo
{"title":"急性视网膜中央动脉和分支动脉闭塞的验光实践模式。","authors":"Kelsey M Mileski, Valérie Biousse, Nancy J Newman, Alexis M Flowers, Wesley Chan, Michael Dattilo","doi":"10.1097/WNO.0000000000001915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optometrists are often the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss and are often the first to diagnose a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). How quickly these patients present to the optometrist, are diagnosed, and referred for evaluation are major factors influencing the possibility of acute therapeutic intervention. Our aim was to survey the U.S. optometric community to determine current optometric practice patterns for management of CRAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous seven-question survey was emailed in 2020 to the 5,101 members of the American Academy of Optometry and the 26,502 members of the American Optometric Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31,603 optometrists who were sent the survey, 1,926 responded (6.1%). Most respondents (1,392/1,919, 72.5%) worked in an optometry-predominant outpatient clinic and were less than 30 minutes from a certified stroke center (1,481/1,923, 77.0%). Ninety-eight percent (1,884/1,922) of respondents had diagnosed less than 5 CRAOs in the previous year, and 1,000/1,922 (52.0%) had not diagnosed a CRAO in the prior year. Of the optometrists who diagnosed at least one CRAO in the previous year, 661/922 (71.7%) evaluated these patients more than 4 hours after the onset of vision loss. Optometrists who diagnosed a CRAO or branch retinal artery occlusion referred patients to an emergency department (ED) affiliated with a certified stroke center (844/1,917, 44.0%), an outpatient ophthalmology clinic (764/1,917, 39.9%), an ED without a stroke center (250/1,917, 13.0%), an outpatient neurology clinic (20/1,917, 1.0%), or other (39/1,917, 2.0%); most (22/39, 56.4%) who responded \"other\" would refer to a primary care physician.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optometrists are likely the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss, including from a retinal artery occlusion. However, only 6.1% of optometrists responded to our survey despite 2 reminder emails, likely reflecting the lack of exposure to acute retinal artery occlusions, and a potential lack of interest of optometrists in participating in research. Of the optometrists who reported evaluating a CRAO in the previous year, less than 29% saw the patient within 4 hours of vision loss. In addition, a large portion of optometrists are referring acute CRAO patients to outpatient ophthalmology clinics, delaying appropriate acute management. Therefore, it is imperative that optometrists and ophthalmologists are educated to view acute retinal arterial ischemia as an acute stroke and urgently refer these patients to an ED affiliated with a stroke center. The delay in patient presentation and these referral patterns make future clinical trials for acute CRAO challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":16485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"350-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optometric Practice Patterns for Acute Central and Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey M Mileski, Valérie Biousse, Nancy J Newman, Alexis M Flowers, Wesley Chan, Michael Dattilo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNO.0000000000001915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optometrists are often the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss and are often the first to diagnose a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). How quickly these patients present to the optometrist, are diagnosed, and referred for evaluation are major factors influencing the possibility of acute therapeutic intervention. Our aim was to survey the U.S. optometric community to determine current optometric practice patterns for management of CRAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous seven-question survey was emailed in 2020 to the 5,101 members of the American Academy of Optometry and the 26,502 members of the American Optometric Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31,603 optometrists who were sent the survey, 1,926 responded (6.1%). Most respondents (1,392/1,919, 72.5%) worked in an optometry-predominant outpatient clinic and were less than 30 minutes from a certified stroke center (1,481/1,923, 77.0%). Ninety-eight percent (1,884/1,922) of respondents had diagnosed less than 5 CRAOs in the previous year, and 1,000/1,922 (52.0%) had not diagnosed a CRAO in the prior year. Of the optometrists who diagnosed at least one CRAO in the previous year, 661/922 (71.7%) evaluated these patients more than 4 hours after the onset of vision loss. Optometrists who diagnosed a CRAO or branch retinal artery occlusion referred patients to an emergency department (ED) affiliated with a certified stroke center (844/1,917, 44.0%), an outpatient ophthalmology clinic (764/1,917, 39.9%), an ED without a stroke center (250/1,917, 13.0%), an outpatient neurology clinic (20/1,917, 1.0%), or other (39/1,917, 2.0%); most (22/39, 56.4%) who responded \\\"other\\\" would refer to a primary care physician.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optometrists are likely the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss, including from a retinal artery occlusion. However, only 6.1% of optometrists responded to our survey despite 2 reminder emails, likely reflecting the lack of exposure to acute retinal artery occlusions, and a potential lack of interest of optometrists in participating in research. Of the optometrists who reported evaluating a CRAO in the previous year, less than 29% saw the patient within 4 hours of vision loss. In addition, a large portion of optometrists are referring acute CRAO patients to outpatient ophthalmology clinics, delaying appropriate acute management. Therefore, it is imperative that optometrists and ophthalmologists are educated to view acute retinal arterial ischemia as an acute stroke and urgently refer these patients to an ED affiliated with a stroke center. The delay in patient presentation and these referral patterns make future clinical trials for acute CRAO challenging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"350-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:验光师通常是第一个评估急性视力丧失患者的提供者,也是第一个诊断视网膜中央动脉阻塞(CRAO)的提供者。这些患者向验光师就诊、诊断和转诊评估的速度是影响急性治疗干预可能性的主要因素。我们的目的是调查美国验光界,以确定CRAO管理的当前验光实践模式。方法:2020年,通过电子邮件向美国验光学会的5101名成员和美国验光协会的26502名成员发送了一份匿名的七个问题的调查。结果:在收到调查的31603名验光师中,1926人回答(6.1%)。大多数受访者(1392/1919,72.5%)在以验光为主的门诊诊所工作,距离认证的中风中心不到30分钟(1481/1923,77.0%)。98%(1884/1922)的受访者在前一年诊断出的CRAO少于5例,1000/1922(52.0%)在前一年度没有诊断出CRAO。在前一年诊断出至少一例CRAO的验光师中,661/922(71.7%)在视力下降发作后4小时以上对这些患者进行了评估。诊断为CRAO或视网膜分支动脉闭塞的验光师将患者转诊至有认证中风中心的急诊科(ED)(844/1917,44.0%)、门诊眼科诊所(764/1917,39.9%)、没有中风中心的ED(250/1917,13.0%)、门诊神经科诊所(20/1917,1.0%)或其他(39/1917,2.0%);大多数(22/39,56.4%)回答“其他”的人会去看初级保健医生。结论:验光师可能是第一批评估急性视力丧失患者的提供者,包括视网膜动脉阻塞患者。然而,尽管有2封提醒电子邮件,但只有6.1%的验光师对我们的调查做出了回应,这可能反映出他们没有接触到急性视网膜动脉闭塞,而且验光师可能对参与研究缺乏兴趣。在前一年报告评估CRAO的验光师中,只有不到29%的人在视力下降的4小时内看到了患者。此外,大部分验光师将急性CRAO患者转诊至眼科门诊,延误了适当的急性治疗。因此,验光师和眼科医生必须接受教育,将急性视网膜动脉缺血视为急性中风,并紧急将这些患者转诊至中风中心附属的急诊室。患者就诊的延迟和这些转诊模式使未来的急性CRAO临床试验具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optometric Practice Patterns for Acute Central and Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion.

Background: Optometrists are often the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss and are often the first to diagnose a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). How quickly these patients present to the optometrist, are diagnosed, and referred for evaluation are major factors influencing the possibility of acute therapeutic intervention. Our aim was to survey the U.S. optometric community to determine current optometric practice patterns for management of CRAO.

Methods: An anonymous seven-question survey was emailed in 2020 to the 5,101 members of the American Academy of Optometry and the 26,502 members of the American Optometric Association.

Results: Of 31,603 optometrists who were sent the survey, 1,926 responded (6.1%). Most respondents (1,392/1,919, 72.5%) worked in an optometry-predominant outpatient clinic and were less than 30 minutes from a certified stroke center (1,481/1,923, 77.0%). Ninety-eight percent (1,884/1,922) of respondents had diagnosed less than 5 CRAOs in the previous year, and 1,000/1,922 (52.0%) had not diagnosed a CRAO in the prior year. Of the optometrists who diagnosed at least one CRAO in the previous year, 661/922 (71.7%) evaluated these patients more than 4 hours after the onset of vision loss. Optometrists who diagnosed a CRAO or branch retinal artery occlusion referred patients to an emergency department (ED) affiliated with a certified stroke center (844/1,917, 44.0%), an outpatient ophthalmology clinic (764/1,917, 39.9%), an ED without a stroke center (250/1,917, 13.0%), an outpatient neurology clinic (20/1,917, 1.0%), or other (39/1,917, 2.0%); most (22/39, 56.4%) who responded "other" would refer to a primary care physician.

Conclusions: Optometrists are likely the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss, including from a retinal artery occlusion. However, only 6.1% of optometrists responded to our survey despite 2 reminder emails, likely reflecting the lack of exposure to acute retinal artery occlusions, and a potential lack of interest of optometrists in participating in research. Of the optometrists who reported evaluating a CRAO in the previous year, less than 29% saw the patient within 4 hours of vision loss. In addition, a large portion of optometrists are referring acute CRAO patients to outpatient ophthalmology clinics, delaying appropriate acute management. Therefore, it is imperative that optometrists and ophthalmologists are educated to view acute retinal arterial ischemia as an acute stroke and urgently refer these patients to an ED affiliated with a stroke center. The delay in patient presentation and these referral patterns make future clinical trials for acute CRAO challenging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (JNO) is the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS). It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and commissioned articles related to neuro-ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信