直接口服抗凝剂:适应症、药代动力学、合并症和围手术期管理综述。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology in Review Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000618
Errol Moras, Kruti Gandhi, Mohammad Khan, Adlyn Moras, James Choi, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow
{"title":"直接口服抗凝剂:适应症、药代动力学、合并症和围手术期管理综述。","authors":"Errol Moras, Kruti Gandhi, Mohammad Khan, Adlyn Moras, James Choi, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have catalyzed a significant paradigm shift in the landscape of anticoagulant therapy, emerging as pivotal agents for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Although the absolute advantages of DOACs over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) may appear modest, clinical guidelines advocate for their preference across various indications, attributing this endorsement to their ease of administration and heightened safety. DOACs find application in preventing and treating diverse cardiovascular conditions. With the progressive expansion of DOAC utility, clinicians encounter intricate decisions concerning the selection of appropriate agents, determination of optimal treatment duration, and utilization within specialized patient subgroups. Extensive evidence has substantiated the noninferiority or superiority of DOACs compared with VKAs in both prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Notably, routine monitoring to evaluate treatment efficacy is not mandated for DOACs; however, they exhibit interactions with co-administered drugs and exert influence on functional coagulation assessments. This review aims to synthesize existing literature, encompassing the delineation of appropriate clinical indications, tailored employment in patients with specific concurrent conditions, needs in monitoring parameters, seamless transitions during shifts between anticoagulant regimens, and a glimpse into forthcoming perspectives in this evolving field.</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":" ","pages":"312-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Oral Anticoagulants: An Overview of Indications, Pharmacokinetics, Comorbidities, and Perioperative Management.\",\"authors\":\"Errol Moras, Kruti Gandhi, Mohammad Khan, Adlyn Moras, James Choi, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have catalyzed a significant paradigm shift in the landscape of anticoagulant therapy, emerging as pivotal agents for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Although the absolute advantages of DOACs over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) may appear modest, clinical guidelines advocate for their preference across various indications, attributing this endorsement to their ease of administration and heightened safety. DOACs find application in preventing and treating diverse cardiovascular conditions. With the progressive expansion of DOAC utility, clinicians encounter intricate decisions concerning the selection of appropriate agents, determination of optimal treatment duration, and utilization within specialized patient subgroups. Extensive evidence has substantiated the noninferiority or superiority of DOACs compared with VKAs in both prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Notably, routine monitoring to evaluate treatment efficacy is not mandated for DOACs; however, they exhibit interactions with co-administered drugs and exert influence on functional coagulation assessments. This review aims to synthesize existing literature, encompassing the delineation of appropriate clinical indications, tailored employment in patients with specific concurrent conditions, needs in monitoring parameters, seamless transitions during shifts between anticoagulant regimens, and a glimpse into forthcoming perspectives in this evolving field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"312-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000618\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)催化了抗凝剂治疗领域的重大范式转变,成为预防心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞症中风的关键药物。尽管DOAC相对于维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)的绝对优势可能看起来并不明显,但临床指南提倡它们在各种适应症中的偏好,并将这种认可归因于它们的易用性和更高的安全性。DOAC可用于预防和治疗各种心血管疾病。随着DOAC效用的逐渐扩大,临床医生在选择合适的药物、确定最佳治疗持续时间以及在专业患者亚组中的利用方面遇到了复杂的决策。大量证据证实,与VKA相比,DOAC在预防和治疗血栓栓塞事件方面没有劣效性或优越性。值得注意的是,DOAC没有强制要求进行常规监测以评估治疗效果;然而,它们表现出与联合给药药物的相互作用,并对功能性凝血评估产生影响。这篇综述旨在综合现有文献,包括适当临床适应症的描述、特定并发疾病患者的量身定制、监测参数的需求、抗凝方案之间的无缝转换,以及对这一不断发展的领域即将出现的前景的一瞥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct Oral Anticoagulants: An Overview of Indications, Pharmacokinetics, Comorbidities, and Perioperative Management.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have catalyzed a significant paradigm shift in the landscape of anticoagulant therapy, emerging as pivotal agents for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Although the absolute advantages of DOACs over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) may appear modest, clinical guidelines advocate for their preference across various indications, attributing this endorsement to their ease of administration and heightened safety. DOACs find application in preventing and treating diverse cardiovascular conditions. With the progressive expansion of DOAC utility, clinicians encounter intricate decisions concerning the selection of appropriate agents, determination of optimal treatment duration, and utilization within specialized patient subgroups. Extensive evidence has substantiated the noninferiority or superiority of DOACs compared with VKAs in both prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Notably, routine monitoring to evaluate treatment efficacy is not mandated for DOACs; however, they exhibit interactions with co-administered drugs and exert influence on functional coagulation assessments. This review aims to synthesize existing literature, encompassing the delineation of appropriate clinical indications, tailored employment in patients with specific concurrent conditions, needs in monitoring parameters, seamless transitions during shifts between anticoagulant regimens, and a glimpse into forthcoming perspectives in this evolving field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in Review
Cardiology in Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信