真实世界的医生在菲律宾环境中进行过敏性鼻炎的诊断和治疗。

IF 1.6 Q3 ALLERGY
Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000112
Maria Cristina V Balotro-Torres, Frances M Tan, Cecilia Gretchen Navarro-Locsin, Marysia T Recto, Joel A Romualdez, Josephine B Ramos, Emily G Resurreccion, Rommel Crisenio M Lobo, Eloisa S de Guia, Ma Fredelita Carreon-Asuncion, Jean Bousquet
{"title":"真实世界的医生在菲律宾环境中进行过敏性鼻炎的诊断和治疗。","authors":"Maria Cristina V Balotro-Torres,&nbsp;Frances M Tan,&nbsp;Cecilia Gretchen Navarro-Locsin,&nbsp;Marysia T Recto,&nbsp;Joel A Romualdez,&nbsp;Josephine B Ramos,&nbsp;Emily G Resurreccion,&nbsp;Rommel Crisenio M Lobo,&nbsp;Eloisa S de Guia,&nbsp;Ma Fredelita Carreon-Asuncion,&nbsp;Jean Bousquet","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician awareness and adherence to guidelines varies among countries and between types of physician practice. Identifying the needs of the physician and patient is essential to improve patient outcome. Data on physician diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis (AR) in the Philippines is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Study objectives are to assess awareness and use of guidelines, practices on diagnosis and management of intermittent and persistent AR, reasons for choice of therapy, and familiarity with immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-section of 590 specialist and 223 subspecialist physicians from 17 regions of the Philippines were surveyed from October 2021 to July 2022. Survey consisted of a 12-point validated online questionnaire on knowledge and use of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, use of diagnostic tests, preferred pharmacologic treatment, preferred adjuvant therapy, reasons for treatment choice, and familiarity with immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven percent of respondents used Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guidelines for diagnosis and management of AR. Three-fifths of respondents \"always\" routinely evaluated AR patients' history and performed a physical examination for asthma; 57% of respondents \"always\" routinely evaluated asthma patients' history and performed a physical examination for AR. Allergy testing was \"sometimes\" recommended by 62.2%. Oral second-generation antihistamines were the preferred choice for the treatment of intermittent AR. Intranasal steroids were the preferred treatment for persistent AR. Top reasons for choice of treatment were guideline recommendations, efficacy, onset of action, cost, and availability of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Filipino specialists and subspecialists are aware and use guidelines in diagnosis and management of AR. Clinical history and physical examination are the cornerstone of diagnosis. Management practices for intermittent and persistent AR are similar for both groups. Recognizing the role of patient treatment preferences and allergen-specific immunotherapy remains to be a gap in the management of AR by Filipino physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"13 3","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/09/pa9-13-105.PMC10516311.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world physician practices on the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis in the Philippine setting.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cristina V Balotro-Torres,&nbsp;Frances M Tan,&nbsp;Cecilia Gretchen Navarro-Locsin,&nbsp;Marysia T Recto,&nbsp;Joel A Romualdez,&nbsp;Josephine B Ramos,&nbsp;Emily G Resurreccion,&nbsp;Rommel Crisenio M Lobo,&nbsp;Eloisa S de Guia,&nbsp;Ma Fredelita Carreon-Asuncion,&nbsp;Jean Bousquet\",\"doi\":\"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician awareness and adherence to guidelines varies among countries and between types of physician practice. Identifying the needs of the physician and patient is essential to improve patient outcome. Data on physician diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis (AR) in the Philippines is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Study objectives are to assess awareness and use of guidelines, practices on diagnosis and management of intermittent and persistent AR, reasons for choice of therapy, and familiarity with immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-section of 590 specialist and 223 subspecialist physicians from 17 regions of the Philippines were surveyed from October 2021 to July 2022. Survey consisted of a 12-point validated online questionnaire on knowledge and use of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, use of diagnostic tests, preferred pharmacologic treatment, preferred adjuvant therapy, reasons for treatment choice, and familiarity with immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven percent of respondents used Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guidelines for diagnosis and management of AR. Three-fifths of respondents \\\"always\\\" routinely evaluated AR patients' history and performed a physical examination for asthma; 57% of respondents \\\"always\\\" routinely evaluated asthma patients' history and performed a physical examination for AR. Allergy testing was \\\"sometimes\\\" recommended by 62.2%. Oral second-generation antihistamines were the preferred choice for the treatment of intermittent AR. Intranasal steroids were the preferred treatment for persistent AR. Top reasons for choice of treatment were guideline recommendations, efficacy, onset of action, cost, and availability of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Filipino specialists and subspecialists are aware and use guidelines in diagnosis and management of AR. Clinical history and physical examination are the cornerstone of diagnosis. Management practices for intermittent and persistent AR are similar for both groups. Recognizing the role of patient treatment preferences and allergen-specific immunotherapy remains to be a gap in the management of AR by Filipino physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"105-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/09/pa9-13-105.PMC10516311.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同国家和不同执业类型的医生对指南的认识和遵守情况各不相同。识别医生和患者的需求对于改善患者的治疗效果至关重要。菲律宾医生诊断和治疗过敏性鼻炎(AR)的数据目前有限。目的:研究目的是评估对间歇性和持续性AR的诊断和管理指南、实践、选择治疗的原因以及对免疫疗法的熟悉程度的认识和使用情况。方法:2021年10月至2022年7月,对来自菲律宾17个地区的590名专科医生和223名亚专科医生进行了横断面调查。调查包括一份12点验证的在线问卷,内容涉及诊断和治疗指南的知识和使用、诊断测试的使用、首选药物治疗、首选辅助治疗、选择治疗的原因以及对免疫疗法的熟悉程度。结果:77%的受访者使用过敏性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响指南来诊断和管理AR。五分之三的受访者“总是”定期评估AR患者的病史并进行哮喘体检;57%的受访者“总是”定期评估哮喘患者的病史并进行AR体检。62.2%的人“有时”建议进行过敏测试。口服第二代抗组胺药是治疗间歇性AR的首选。鼻内类固醇是治疗持续性AR的首选药物。选择治疗的主要原因是指南建议、疗效、起效时间、费用和治疗的可用性。结论:菲律宾专家和专科医生了解并使用AR的诊断和管理指南。临床病史和体检是诊断的基石。间歇性AR和持续性AR的管理实践在两组中都是相似的。菲律宾医生在AR管理方面,认识到患者治疗偏好和过敏原特异性免疫疗法的作用仍然是一个空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-world physician practices on the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis in the Philippine setting.

Real-world physician practices on the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis in the Philippine setting.

Real-world physician practices on the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis in the Philippine setting.

Real-world physician practices on the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis in the Philippine setting.

Background: Physician awareness and adherence to guidelines varies among countries and between types of physician practice. Identifying the needs of the physician and patient is essential to improve patient outcome. Data on physician diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis (AR) in the Philippines is currently limited.

Objective: Study objectives are to assess awareness and use of guidelines, practices on diagnosis and management of intermittent and persistent AR, reasons for choice of therapy, and familiarity with immunotherapy.

Methods: A cross-section of 590 specialist and 223 subspecialist physicians from 17 regions of the Philippines were surveyed from October 2021 to July 2022. Survey consisted of a 12-point validated online questionnaire on knowledge and use of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, use of diagnostic tests, preferred pharmacologic treatment, preferred adjuvant therapy, reasons for treatment choice, and familiarity with immunotherapy.

Results: Seventy-seven percent of respondents used Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guidelines for diagnosis and management of AR. Three-fifths of respondents "always" routinely evaluated AR patients' history and performed a physical examination for asthma; 57% of respondents "always" routinely evaluated asthma patients' history and performed a physical examination for AR. Allergy testing was "sometimes" recommended by 62.2%. Oral second-generation antihistamines were the preferred choice for the treatment of intermittent AR. Intranasal steroids were the preferred treatment for persistent AR. Top reasons for choice of treatment were guideline recommendations, efficacy, onset of action, cost, and availability of treatment.

Conclusion: Filipino specialists and subspecialists are aware and use guidelines in diagnosis and management of AR. Clinical history and physical examination are the cornerstone of diagnosis. Management practices for intermittent and persistent AR are similar for both groups. Recognizing the role of patient treatment preferences and allergen-specific immunotherapy remains to be a gap in the management of AR by Filipino physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信