环境健康与安全为基因治疗过程从研发转移到大规模生产的理论模型提供了生物安全风险评估。

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Applied Biosafety Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1089/apb.2023.0007
Simon Godwin, Shana Elkind, Timmy Carey, Kimberly DiGiandomenico, Alexa Balbo, Jemma Blocksidge, Jessica Olson, Jess Miklosko, Leo Njongmeta, Francine Preston, Rachel Hodges
{"title":"环境健康与安全为基因治疗过程从研发转移到大规模生产的理论模型提供了生物安全风险评估。","authors":"Simon Godwin, Shana Elkind, Timmy Carey, Kimberly DiGiandomenico, Alexa Balbo, Jemma Blocksidge, Jessica Olson, Jess Miklosko, Leo Njongmeta, Francine Preston, Rachel Hodges","doi":"10.1089/apb.2023.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article provides a strategy by which a manufacturing process with a Biosafety Level 2 (BL2) designation can be downgraded to Biosafety Level 1 (BL1). The principles of the downgrading process are based on the robust contamination controls in clinical and commercial manufacturing, which typically are not part of Research and Development processes. These strict requirements along with the application of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) principles provide a framework by which processes can be suitably managed and controlled to mitigate biohazard risk, specifically for cell lines that may be contaminated with human pathogenic viral agents.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We demonstrate how a risk assessment guide was used to define the risk profile of a theoretical process with a human cell line intended for clinical/commercial application. Based on the risk assessment, key BL2 elements were identified as suitable for downgrading, including facility containment controls, emergency spill response plans, and storage and shipping requirements. For various reasons, some aspects of the systems were deemed unsuitable for downgrading due to the severity of the control risk and, therefore, remained at BL2.</p><p><strong>Summary and conclusions: </strong>We have used an established risk assessment guide to show how cGMP compliments and augments biosafety containment. We provide justification for downgrading from BL2 to BL1 for clinical and commercial cell and gene therapy manufacturing with human cell lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"28 3","pages":"164-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Health and Safety Offers a Biosafety Risk Assessment for a Theoretical Model of a Gene Therapy Process Transfer from Research and Development to Large-Scale Manufacturing.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Godwin, Shana Elkind, Timmy Carey, Kimberly DiGiandomenico, Alexa Balbo, Jemma Blocksidge, Jessica Olson, Jess Miklosko, Leo Njongmeta, Francine Preston, Rachel Hodges\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apb.2023.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article provides a strategy by which a manufacturing process with a Biosafety Level 2 (BL2) designation can be downgraded to Biosafety Level 1 (BL1). The principles of the downgrading process are based on the robust contamination controls in clinical and commercial manufacturing, which typically are not part of Research and Development processes. These strict requirements along with the application of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) principles provide a framework by which processes can be suitably managed and controlled to mitigate biohazard risk, specifically for cell lines that may be contaminated with human pathogenic viral agents.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We demonstrate how a risk assessment guide was used to define the risk profile of a theoretical process with a human cell line intended for clinical/commercial application. Based on the risk assessment, key BL2 elements were identified as suitable for downgrading, including facility containment controls, emergency spill response plans, and storage and shipping requirements. For various reasons, some aspects of the systems were deemed unsuitable for downgrading due to the severity of the control risk and, therefore, remained at BL2.</p><p><strong>Summary and conclusions: </strong>We have used an established risk assessment guide to show how cGMP compliments and augments biosafety containment. We provide justification for downgrading from BL2 to BL1 for clinical and commercial cell and gene therapy manufacturing with human cell lines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"164-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2023.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2023.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这篇文章提供了一种策略,通过该策略,具有生物安全2级(BL2)标志的制造工艺可以降级为生物安全1级(BL1)。降级过程的原则是基于临床和商业制造中强有力的污染控制,这通常不是研发过程的一部分。这些严格的要求以及当前良好生产规范(cGMP)原则的应用提供了一个框架,通过该框架可以适当地管理和控制工艺,以降低生物危害风险,特别是对于可能被人类致病病毒制剂污染的细胞系。目的:我们展示了如何使用风险评估指南来定义用于临床/商业应用的人类细胞系的理论过程的风险概况。根据风险评估,确定了适合降级的关键BL2要素,包括设施控制、应急泄漏响应计划以及储存和运输要求。由于各种原因,由于控制风险的严重性,系统的某些方面被认为不适合降级,因此仍处于BL2。总结和结论:我们使用了既定的风险评估指南来展示cGMP如何补充和加强生物安全控制。我们为用人类细胞系生产临床和商业细胞和基因治疗提供了从BL2降级为BL1的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Health and Safety Offers a Biosafety Risk Assessment for a Theoretical Model of a Gene Therapy Process Transfer from Research and Development to Large-Scale Manufacturing.

Introduction: This article provides a strategy by which a manufacturing process with a Biosafety Level 2 (BL2) designation can be downgraded to Biosafety Level 1 (BL1). The principles of the downgrading process are based on the robust contamination controls in clinical and commercial manufacturing, which typically are not part of Research and Development processes. These strict requirements along with the application of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) principles provide a framework by which processes can be suitably managed and controlled to mitigate biohazard risk, specifically for cell lines that may be contaminated with human pathogenic viral agents.

Purpose: We demonstrate how a risk assessment guide was used to define the risk profile of a theoretical process with a human cell line intended for clinical/commercial application. Based on the risk assessment, key BL2 elements were identified as suitable for downgrading, including facility containment controls, emergency spill response plans, and storage and shipping requirements. For various reasons, some aspects of the systems were deemed unsuitable for downgrading due to the severity of the control risk and, therefore, remained at BL2.

Summary and conclusions: We have used an established risk assessment guide to show how cGMP compliments and augments biosafety containment. We provide justification for downgrading from BL2 to BL1 for clinical and commercial cell and gene therapy manufacturing with human cell lines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信