光子计数探测器CT用于体外灌注人体尸体模型中的股骨支架成像。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-07 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001019
Viktor Hartung, Philipp Gruschwitz, Henner Huflage, Anne Marie Augustin, Florian Kleefeldt, Dominik Peter, Sven Lichthardt, Süleyman Ergün, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Jan-Peter Grunz, Bernhard Petritsch
{"title":"光子计数探测器CT用于体外灌注人体尸体模型中的股骨支架成像。","authors":"Viktor Hartung, Philipp Gruschwitz, Henner Huflage, Anne Marie Augustin, Florian Kleefeldt, Dominik Peter, Sven Lichthardt, Süleyman Ergün, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Jan-Peter Grunz, Bernhard Petritsch","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aims to compare the performance of first-generation dual-source photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to third-generation dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID-CT) regarding stent imaging in the femoral arterial runoff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Continuous extracorporeal perfusion was established in 1 human cadaver using an inguinal and infragenicular access and peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were implanted into both superior femoral arteries by means of percutaneous angioplasty. Radiation dose-equivalent CT angiographies (high-/medium-/low-dose: 10/5/3 mGy) with constant tube voltage of 120 kVp, matching iterative reconstruction algorithm levels, and convolution kernels were used both with PCD-CT and EID-CT. In-stent lumen visibility, luminal and in-stent attenuation as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed via region of interest and diameter measurements. Results were compared using analyses of variance and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum in-stent lumen visibility achieved with PCD-CT was 94.48% ± 2.62%. The PCD-CT protocol with the lowest lumen visibility (BV40: 78.93% ± 4.67%) performed equal to the EID-CT protocol with the best lumen visibility (BV59: 79.49% ± 2.64%, P > 0.999). Photon-counting detector CT yielded superior CNR compared with EID-CT regardless of kernel and dose level ( P < 0.001). Maximum CNR was 48.8 ± 17.4 in PCD-CT versus 31.28 ± 5.7 in EID-CT (both BV40, high-dose). The theoretical dose reduction potential of PCD-CT over EID-CT was established at 88% (BV40), 83% (BV48/49), and 73% (BV59/60), respectively. In-stent attenuation was not significantly different from luminal attenuation outside stents in any protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With superior lumen visibility and CNR, PCD-CT allowed for noticeable dose reduction over EID-CT while maintaining image quality in a continuously perfused human cadaveric model.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photon-Counting Detector CT for Femoral Stent Imaging in an Extracorporeally Perfused Human Cadaveric Model.\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Hartung, Philipp Gruschwitz, Henner Huflage, Anne Marie Augustin, Florian Kleefeldt, Dominik Peter, Sven Lichthardt, Süleyman Ergün, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Jan-Peter Grunz, Bernhard Petritsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aims to compare the performance of first-generation dual-source photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to third-generation dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID-CT) regarding stent imaging in the femoral arterial runoff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Continuous extracorporeal perfusion was established in 1 human cadaver using an inguinal and infragenicular access and peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were implanted into both superior femoral arteries by means of percutaneous angioplasty. Radiation dose-equivalent CT angiographies (high-/medium-/low-dose: 10/5/3 mGy) with constant tube voltage of 120 kVp, matching iterative reconstruction algorithm levels, and convolution kernels were used both with PCD-CT and EID-CT. In-stent lumen visibility, luminal and in-stent attenuation as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed via region of interest and diameter measurements. Results were compared using analyses of variance and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum in-stent lumen visibility achieved with PCD-CT was 94.48% ± 2.62%. The PCD-CT protocol with the lowest lumen visibility (BV40: 78.93% ± 4.67%) performed equal to the EID-CT protocol with the best lumen visibility (BV59: 79.49% ± 2.64%, P > 0.999). Photon-counting detector CT yielded superior CNR compared with EID-CT regardless of kernel and dose level ( P < 0.001). Maximum CNR was 48.8 ± 17.4 in PCD-CT versus 31.28 ± 5.7 in EID-CT (both BV40, high-dose). The theoretical dose reduction potential of PCD-CT over EID-CT was established at 88% (BV40), 83% (BV48/49), and 73% (BV59/60), respectively. In-stent attenuation was not significantly different from luminal attenuation outside stents in any protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With superior lumen visibility and CNR, PCD-CT allowed for noticeable dose reduction over EID-CT while maintaining image quality in a continuously perfused human cadaveric model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究旨在比较第一代双源光子计数探测器计算机断层扫描(PCD-CT)和第三代双源能量积分探测器(EID-CT)在股动脉径流量支架成像方面的性能。方法:在1具尸体中使用腹股沟和膝下通道和蠕动泵建立连续体外灌注。采用经皮血管成形术将7个外周支架植入股上动脉。PCD-CT和EID-CT均使用辐射剂量等效CT血管造影(高/中/低剂量:10/5/3 mGy),恒定管电压为120 kVp,匹配迭代重建算法水平和卷积核。通过感兴趣区域和直径测量来评估支架内管腔的可见性、管腔和支架内衰减以及对比噪声比(CNR)。使用方差分析和回归分析对结果进行比较。结果:PCD-CT实现的最大支架内管腔能见度为94.48%±2.62%。管腔能见度最低的PCD-CT方案(BV40:78.93%±4.67%)与管腔能见度最高的EID-CT方案(BV59:79.49%±2.64%,P>0.05)相当。与EID-CT相比,无论内核和剂量水平如何,光子计数探测器CT的CNR均较高(P<0.001)。最大CNRPCD-CT为48.8±17.4,而EID-CT为31.28±5.7(均为高剂量BV40)。与EID-CT相比,PCD-CT的理论剂量减少潜力分别为88%(BV40)、83%(BV48/49)和73%(BV59/60)。在任何方案中,支架内衰减与支架外管腔衰减没有显著差异。结论:在连续灌注的人体尸体模型中,PCD-CT具有良好的管腔可见度和CNR,与EID-CT相比,PCD-CT可以显著降低剂量,同时保持图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photon-Counting Detector CT for Femoral Stent Imaging in an Extracorporeally Perfused Human Cadaveric Model.

Background and aims: This study aims to compare the performance of first-generation dual-source photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to third-generation dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID-CT) regarding stent imaging in the femoral arterial runoff.

Methods: Continuous extracorporeal perfusion was established in 1 human cadaver using an inguinal and infragenicular access and peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were implanted into both superior femoral arteries by means of percutaneous angioplasty. Radiation dose-equivalent CT angiographies (high-/medium-/low-dose: 10/5/3 mGy) with constant tube voltage of 120 kVp, matching iterative reconstruction algorithm levels, and convolution kernels were used both with PCD-CT and EID-CT. In-stent lumen visibility, luminal and in-stent attenuation as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed via region of interest and diameter measurements. Results were compared using analyses of variance and regression analyses.

Results: Maximum in-stent lumen visibility achieved with PCD-CT was 94.48% ± 2.62%. The PCD-CT protocol with the lowest lumen visibility (BV40: 78.93% ± 4.67%) performed equal to the EID-CT protocol with the best lumen visibility (BV59: 79.49% ± 2.64%, P > 0.999). Photon-counting detector CT yielded superior CNR compared with EID-CT regardless of kernel and dose level ( P < 0.001). Maximum CNR was 48.8 ± 17.4 in PCD-CT versus 31.28 ± 5.7 in EID-CT (both BV40, high-dose). The theoretical dose reduction potential of PCD-CT over EID-CT was established at 88% (BV40), 83% (BV48/49), and 73% (BV59/60), respectively. In-stent attenuation was not significantly different from luminal attenuation outside stents in any protocol.

Conclusions: With superior lumen visibility and CNR, PCD-CT allowed for noticeable dose reduction over EID-CT while maintaining image quality in a continuously perfused human cadaveric model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信