Chao Fang, Niel Verbrigghe, Bjarni D. Sigurdsson, Ivika Ostonen, Niki I. W. Leblans, Sara Mara?ón-Jiménez, Lucia Fuchslueger, Páll Siguresson, Kathiravan Meeran, Miguel Portillo-Estrada, Erik Verbruggen, Andreas Richter, Jordi Sardans, Josep Pe?uelas, Michael Bahn, Sara Vicca, Ivan A. Janssens
{"title":"几十年的土壤变暖通过诱导氮限制降低了亚北极草原地下和地上维管植物的产量","authors":"Chao Fang, Niel Verbrigghe, Bjarni D. Sigurdsson, Ivika Ostonen, Niki I. W. Leblans, Sara Mara?ón-Jiménez, Lucia Fuchslueger, Páll Siguresson, Kathiravan Meeran, Miguel Portillo-Estrada, Erik Verbruggen, Andreas Richter, Jordi Sardans, Josep Pe?uelas, Michael Bahn, Sara Vicca, Ivan A. Janssens","doi":"10.1111/nph.19177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Below and aboveground vegetation dynamics are crucial in understanding how climate warming may affect terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling. In contrast to aboveground biomass, the response of belowground biomass to long-term warming has been poorly studied.</li>\n \n <li>Here, we characterized the impacts of decadal geothermal warming at two levels (on average +3.3°C and +7.9°C) on below and aboveground plant biomass stocks and production in a subarctic grassland.</li>\n \n <li>Soil warming did not change standing root biomass and even decreased fine root production and reduced aboveground biomass and production. Decadal soil warming also did not significantly alter the root–shoot ratio. The linear stepwise regression model suggested that following 10 yr of soil warming, temperature was no longer the direct driver of these responses, but losses of soil N were. Soil N losses, due to warming-induced decreases in organic matter and water retention capacity, were identified as key driver of the decreased above and belowground production. The reduction in fine root production was accompanied by thinner roots with increased specific root area.</li>\n \n <li>These results indicate that after a decade of soil warming, plant productivity in the studied subarctic grassland was affected by soil warming mainly by the reduction in soil N.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"240 2","pages":"565-576"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decadal soil warming decreased vascular plant above and belowground production in a subarctic grassland by inducing nitrogen limitation\",\"authors\":\"Chao Fang, Niel Verbrigghe, Bjarni D. Sigurdsson, Ivika Ostonen, Niki I. W. Leblans, Sara Mara?ón-Jiménez, Lucia Fuchslueger, Páll Siguresson, Kathiravan Meeran, Miguel Portillo-Estrada, Erik Verbruggen, Andreas Richter, Jordi Sardans, Josep Pe?uelas, Michael Bahn, Sara Vicca, Ivan A. Janssens\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.19177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Below and aboveground vegetation dynamics are crucial in understanding how climate warming may affect terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling. In contrast to aboveground biomass, the response of belowground biomass to long-term warming has been poorly studied.</li>\\n \\n <li>Here, we characterized the impacts of decadal geothermal warming at two levels (on average +3.3°C and +7.9°C) on below and aboveground plant biomass stocks and production in a subarctic grassland.</li>\\n \\n <li>Soil warming did not change standing root biomass and even decreased fine root production and reduced aboveground biomass and production. Decadal soil warming also did not significantly alter the root–shoot ratio. The linear stepwise regression model suggested that following 10 yr of soil warming, temperature was no longer the direct driver of these responses, but losses of soil N were. Soil N losses, due to warming-induced decreases in organic matter and water retention capacity, were identified as key driver of the decreased above and belowground production. The reduction in fine root production was accompanied by thinner roots with increased specific root area.</li>\\n \\n <li>These results indicate that after a decade of soil warming, plant productivity in the studied subarctic grassland was affected by soil warming mainly by the reduction in soil N.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":\"240 2\",\"pages\":\"565-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19177\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decadal soil warming decreased vascular plant above and belowground production in a subarctic grassland by inducing nitrogen limitation
Below and aboveground vegetation dynamics are crucial in understanding how climate warming may affect terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling. In contrast to aboveground biomass, the response of belowground biomass to long-term warming has been poorly studied.
Here, we characterized the impacts of decadal geothermal warming at two levels (on average +3.3°C and +7.9°C) on below and aboveground plant biomass stocks and production in a subarctic grassland.
Soil warming did not change standing root biomass and even decreased fine root production and reduced aboveground biomass and production. Decadal soil warming also did not significantly alter the root–shoot ratio. The linear stepwise regression model suggested that following 10 yr of soil warming, temperature was no longer the direct driver of these responses, but losses of soil N were. Soil N losses, due to warming-induced decreases in organic matter and water retention capacity, were identified as key driver of the decreased above and belowground production. The reduction in fine root production was accompanied by thinner roots with increased specific root area.
These results indicate that after a decade of soil warming, plant productivity in the studied subarctic grassland was affected by soil warming mainly by the reduction in soil N.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.