医院效率低下的随机前沿分析:对经验问题的回顾和稳健性评估。

Medical care research and review : MCRR Pub Date : 2008-04-01 Epub Date: 2007-11-28 DOI:10.1177/1077558707307580
Michael D Rosko, Ryan L Mutter
{"title":"医院效率低下的随机前沿分析:对经验问题的回顾和稳健性评估。","authors":"Michael D Rosko,&nbsp;Ryan L Mutter","doi":"10.1177/1077558707307580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) studies of hospital inefficiency in the United States were analyzed. Results from best-practice methods were compared against previously used methods in hospital studies to ascertain the robustness of SFA in estimating cost inefficiency. To compare past studies and analyze new data, SFA methods were varied by (a) the assumptions of the structure of costs and distribution of the error term, (b) inclusion of quality and product descriptor measures, and (c) use of simultaneous and two-stage estimation techniques. SFA results were relatively insensitive to several model variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":" ","pages":"131-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1077558707307580","citationCount":"113","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic frontier analysis of hospital inefficiency: a review of empirical issues and an assessment of robustness.\",\"authors\":\"Michael D Rosko,&nbsp;Ryan L Mutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1077558707307580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Twenty stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) studies of hospital inefficiency in the United States were analyzed. Results from best-practice methods were compared against previously used methods in hospital studies to ascertain the robustness of SFA in estimating cost inefficiency. To compare past studies and analyze new data, SFA methods were varied by (a) the assumptions of the structure of costs and distribution of the error term, (b) inclusion of quality and product descriptor measures, and (c) use of simultaneous and two-stage estimation techniques. SFA results were relatively insensitive to several model variations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical care research and review : MCRR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"131-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1077558707307580\",\"citationCount\":\"113\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical care research and review : MCRR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707307580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2007/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707307580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2007/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

摘要

本文分析了美国20项关于医院效率低下的随机前沿分析(SFA)研究。将最佳实践方法的结果与先前在医院研究中使用的方法进行比较,以确定SFA在估计成本低效率方面的稳健性。为了比较过去的研究和分析新数据,SFA方法在以下方面有所不同:(a)成本结构和误差项分布的假设,(b)包含质量和产品描述符度量,以及(c)使用同步和两阶段估计技术。SFA结果对几种模型变化相对不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stochastic frontier analysis of hospital inefficiency: a review of empirical issues and an assessment of robustness.

Twenty stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) studies of hospital inefficiency in the United States were analyzed. Results from best-practice methods were compared against previously used methods in hospital studies to ascertain the robustness of SFA in estimating cost inefficiency. To compare past studies and analyze new data, SFA methods were varied by (a) the assumptions of the structure of costs and distribution of the error term, (b) inclusion of quality and product descriptor measures, and (c) use of simultaneous and two-stage estimation techniques. SFA results were relatively insensitive to several model variations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信