M Van Blerk, W Coucke, B Chatelain, W Goossens, K Jochmans, K Meeus, K Mertens, O Pradier, J-L Rummens, J-M Scheiff, J-C Libeer
{"title":"比利时血气分析仪测量血红蛋白的外部质量评价。","authors":"M Van Blerk, W Coucke, B Chatelain, W Goossens, K Jochmans, K Meeus, K Mertens, O Pradier, J-L Rummens, J-M Scheiff, J-C Libeer","doi":"10.1080/00365510701297464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Belgian national External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) for haematology organized a survey to assess the reliability of haemoglobin (Hb) measurements with the blood gas analysers (BGAs) currently available in Belgian hospitals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All hospital laboratories received two specimens of fresh EDTA anticoagulated whole blood and were asked to determine the Hb concentration using both the conventional haematology analyser (HA) and all BGAs in the hospital. Ninety-seven hospital laboratories participated in the study and a total of 166 results were reported. The BGAs used (grouped according to technology) were Rapidlab 845, 855, 865 (Bayer 1, n = 41), Rapidlab 1245, 1265, Rapidpoint 405 (Bayer 2, n = 19), GEM Premier 3000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, IL, n = 13), ABL 500 and 600 series (Radiometer 1, n = 13), ABL 700 and 800 series (Radiometer 2, n = 35), Omni C, S5 (Roche 1, n = 7), Omni 3, 6, 9, S2, S4, S6 (Roche 2, n = 21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the BGAs from Bayer, Radiometer and Roche, interlaboratory variation ranged from 0.6 % to 4.1 %, indicating good precision and close agreement between centres. A significant negative bias observed on the GEM Premier 3000 using the EDTA anticoagulated blood samples did not appear to be present in fresh heparinized whole blood samples. There was no significant difference in imprecision and bias between Hb measurements on BGA situated in and outside the central laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":501634,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"735-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00365510701297464","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External quality assessment in the measurement of haemoglobin by blood gas analysers in Belgium.\",\"authors\":\"M Van Blerk, W Coucke, B Chatelain, W Goossens, K Jochmans, K Meeus, K Mertens, O Pradier, J-L Rummens, J-M Scheiff, J-C Libeer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365510701297464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Belgian national External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) for haematology organized a survey to assess the reliability of haemoglobin (Hb) measurements with the blood gas analysers (BGAs) currently available in Belgian hospitals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All hospital laboratories received two specimens of fresh EDTA anticoagulated whole blood and were asked to determine the Hb concentration using both the conventional haematology analyser (HA) and all BGAs in the hospital. Ninety-seven hospital laboratories participated in the study and a total of 166 results were reported. The BGAs used (grouped according to technology) were Rapidlab 845, 855, 865 (Bayer 1, n = 41), Rapidlab 1245, 1265, Rapidpoint 405 (Bayer 2, n = 19), GEM Premier 3000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, IL, n = 13), ABL 500 and 600 series (Radiometer 1, n = 13), ABL 700 and 800 series (Radiometer 2, n = 35), Omni C, S5 (Roche 1, n = 7), Omni 3, 6, 9, S2, S4, S6 (Roche 2, n = 21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the BGAs from Bayer, Radiometer and Roche, interlaboratory variation ranged from 0.6 % to 4.1 %, indicating good precision and close agreement between centres. A significant negative bias observed on the GEM Premier 3000 using the EDTA anticoagulated blood samples did not appear to be present in fresh heparinized whole blood samples. There was no significant difference in imprecision and bias between Hb measurements on BGA situated in and outside the central laboratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"735-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00365510701297464\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510701297464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510701297464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
目的:比利时国家血液学外部质量评估计划(EQAS)组织了一项调查,以评估比利时医院目前可用的血气分析仪(BGAs)血红蛋白(Hb)测量的可靠性。材料和方法:所有医院实验室收到两份新鲜EDTA抗凝全血标本,并要求使用常规血液学分析仪(HA)和医院所有BGAs测定Hb浓度。97家医院实验室参与了这项研究,共报告了166项结果。所使用的BGAs(按技术分组)有Rapidlab 845、855、865(拜耳1号,n = 41)、Rapidlab 1245、1265、Rapidpoint 405(拜耳2号,n = 19)、GEM Premier 3000(仪器实验室,IL, n = 13)、ABL 500和600系列(Radiometer 1号,n = 13)、ABL 700和800系列(Radiometer 2号,n = 35)、Omni C、S5(罗氏1号,n = 7)、Omni 3、6、9、S2、S4、S6(罗氏2号,n = 21)。结果:对于拜耳、Radiometer和罗氏的BGAs,实验室间的变化范围为0.6%至4.1%,表明了良好的精度和中心之间的密切一致。在GEM Premier 3000中使用EDTA抗凝血样本观察到的显著负偏倚在新鲜肝素化全血样本中似乎不存在。在中心实验室内外的BGA上Hb测量的不精确性和偏差没有显著差异。
External quality assessment in the measurement of haemoglobin by blood gas analysers in Belgium.
Objective: The Belgian national External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) for haematology organized a survey to assess the reliability of haemoglobin (Hb) measurements with the blood gas analysers (BGAs) currently available in Belgian hospitals.
Material and methods: All hospital laboratories received two specimens of fresh EDTA anticoagulated whole blood and were asked to determine the Hb concentration using both the conventional haematology analyser (HA) and all BGAs in the hospital. Ninety-seven hospital laboratories participated in the study and a total of 166 results were reported. The BGAs used (grouped according to technology) were Rapidlab 845, 855, 865 (Bayer 1, n = 41), Rapidlab 1245, 1265, Rapidpoint 405 (Bayer 2, n = 19), GEM Premier 3000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, IL, n = 13), ABL 500 and 600 series (Radiometer 1, n = 13), ABL 700 and 800 series (Radiometer 2, n = 35), Omni C, S5 (Roche 1, n = 7), Omni 3, 6, 9, S2, S4, S6 (Roche 2, n = 21).
Results: For the BGAs from Bayer, Radiometer and Roche, interlaboratory variation ranged from 0.6 % to 4.1 %, indicating good precision and close agreement between centres. A significant negative bias observed on the GEM Premier 3000 using the EDTA anticoagulated blood samples did not appear to be present in fresh heparinized whole blood samples. There was no significant difference in imprecision and bias between Hb measurements on BGA situated in and outside the central laboratory.